Usually once a woman has one kid, the mothering instincts kick in and they begin to understand that they should stay home. Many can't, because of economic pressures (hyper inflation forcing everyone to work), but many would prefer to stay home with the kids.

I have female family members like that, that pursued their careers hard core, and then once they had their first kid, they wanted to quit and stay home. There's also lots of evidence of "career" women who want nothing to do with kids, but once they see or hold a baby, they immediately get the baby fever. I've also seen this first hand, with women that swore they never wanted kids.

The propaganda is a deluge 24/7, because it has to be. We're hard coded to our biological roles, and even in the face of that propaganda, it still expressed immediately when even a hint of the truth touches us.

It's not. Neither did Jesus use it in the narrow geographic sense you do. It's pretty simple really, but you pervert it. Why?

I'm not the one perverting it. Modern jews are perverting it, by trying to tie themselves into the ancient Israelites, who were, in fact, pre-Christians. Modern jews, merely by identifying as such, are all Christ deniers.

At least you ask a reasonable question. The answer is in the entire second and third chapters of the book of Revelation, not in perverting His words "not Jews" into "he really meant jews."

I've read Revelations, and just reread books 2 and 3. Nowhere in books 2 and 3 does it answer this question. The only times jews are directly mentioned in books 2 and 3, is in 2:9 and 3:9, which proves the point I made, not yours. Again, make your point, and be specific. Stop falling back to "but books 2 and 3 prove my point", and then don't specify.

You reveal the source of your error, and this is easy for you to find simply by reading the Bible. They in fact were still Jews.

Perhaps they still thought of themselves as jews genealogically, but as newly converted Christians, they would've understood that lineage no longer held any power or meaning, and would've completely abandoned its use. The New Testament is rife, in almost every single book, talking about how jewish lineage means nothing to God, and that the new covenant is through Jesus.

Yet you skip Paul referring to himself as a Jew. That's pretty jewy behavior of you.

Addressed above, and doesn't prove your point. Paul got so pissed off at his fellow jews he essentially told them "curse you, I'm going to go preach and evangelize the non-jews", which is what the book of Acts points out. Also, LOL at your attempt at trying to invert and claim your opponent is what you're doing (which is classic jewish behavior).

Simple. So are Jews. Just like anybody else.

Way to go, to deflect and miss the point entirely. You're picking and choosing what to reply to, because you know you can't refute what I said. Thus, you try to derail into meaningless conversations and side arguments that have no bearing upon the larger issue.

I never did that. Why do you have to lie?

Yes, you did. The quote is directly above, you two faced forked tongued liar.

Since you've invested so heavily into the talmud, you owe it to yourself to learn that it's about how to be a Jew while there's no Temple. Some 40% of the law of Moses can't be kept without it. jews don't consider it holy like you do, they recognize it's just rabbis arguing and mostly about arcane bits of law that Moses didn't make clear. I'll tell you it's horrible literature that does a terrible job of what it sets out to do, but you don't understand what that is based on what you've said here.

You tried to downplay the complete inversions of scripture in the Talmud, the horrific things it condones and advocates, by painting it as "it's about how to be a jew while there's no temple". You are trying to play off as being smart, while also ignoring the greater horrors contained within the Talmud, suggesting it's innocuous, and not wholly evil. Again, you're a subversive and a liar.

No you didn't. All you can do is lie. Seek professional help.

??? This reply doesn't follow from what you quoted. Did you mean "No I didn't"? If that's the case, all that needs to be said, is that your profile is free to peruse for anyone here, who can see how you reply to ANYONE critical of Israel and jews, here and elsewhere. You lie, attack the commenter, deflect, don't address key issues brought up, and use logical fallacies. Oh, and by your debate """prowess""" displayed, you display several other aspects of jewish behavior, like trying to accuse your enemy of what you're guilty of.

Again, you glow brighter than the sun. It's obvious who you are. Try to gaslight someone else. It won't work on me.

Your point is not Jesus' point.

What was Jesus's point, then?

You assume Jews are a monolithic block, nothing else will fit into your thinking, when "3 Jews 4 opinions" is much closer to reality. Jews are far more splintered in their thinking and beliefs than Protestants, and most don't ascribe to what you've said here at all. Yet you can't fathom even this much.

False. The very term "jew", by itself, that jews use themselves to describe themselves, is a declaration that they are deniers of Christ. There is no other way to cut that term, except that they still embrace a religion that's now defunct by God, and continued through faith in Jesus. All of the "jews" back during Jesus's day that converted to Christianity no longer called themselves "jews", and their descendants no longer call themselves jews. They called (and still call) themselves Christians. Go reread all of Paul's letters to the early Christian churches, and the book of Acts. They explicitly lay out how awful the Christ denying jews back then were, and that the jews must, if they want to align with their own religion, accept Jesus as their messiah, throw away the old ceremonial Hebraic law, and put their faith in Jesus.

This is why the term "jew" is such a misnomer for modern Christians who've been duped by dispensationalism (judeo-Christianity) pushed by John Nelson Darby, Cyrus Ingerson Scofield, and the Rothschilds who funded them to corrupt Christianity. Jews, who call themselves jews, only call themselves that because they still erroniously think they can practice their "religion", when there's no temple, there's no priestly cast descended from Aaron, and there's numerous other specific rules that God laid out that they're explicitly not following, because again, these people follow the Talmud, not the Old Testament. Modern jews think they're "saved" merely by being jews, which is explicitly what Paul was arguing against in Galatians 3 ("there is neither jew nor Greek..."). We're not saved by our blood lines. We're saved through Jesus, and only through Jesus. In fact, if you read the OT, it's obvious that jews have NEVER been saved purely by being jews, or more accurately, by being descendants of Jacob (renamed to Israel by God). This is also why Jesus made a few parables about trees and seeds, saying that fruitful people (i.e. non jews) would be grafted into the promise God made to Jacob, and cut away, curse, and burn up the unproductive branches (i.e. jews who deny Christ). This is also why John the Baptist said "For I tell you that God is able from these stones to raise up children to Abraham" in Matthew 3:9. John and Jesus were both saying, explicitly, that the descent of jews means nothing to God. And, if you read how thoroughly and how often God punished jews in the OT for being awful, you'd understand that God's promises aren't unconditional, and they never have been.

The overwhelming majority of US jews have no use for the talmud, at all:

Really? Then why do the vast majority align with the perversions and anti-jewish rhetoric in the Talmud? Why do jews, when their fellow jews are caught doing some of the abhorrent things espoused in the Talmud, do all the other jews cover for and defend them? Why are jews so disproportionately involved in all of the aspects of evil, degeneracy, lies, and corruption within the world? Do you truly need me to name all of them? Just a list of the surface level topics themselves would be a long paragraph, not involving the histories, and just going off of what I remember.

Since you've invested so heavily into the talmud, you owe it to yourself to learn that it's about how to be a Jew while there's no Temple.

LOL. Just LOL. This is repugnantly false. There's a saying: "what the Torah forbids, the Talmud permits". The Talmud uses jewish legalese to try to word game and twist Gods clear instructions and commandments, often to "interpret" Biblical passages into meaning the complete antithesis of what God meant. Why do you think Jesus was butting heads with the Pharisees and scribes back in the day? They were committing the very same sins that inevitably resulted in the Talmud (to a more severe degree), that they were following the letter of the law, while intentionally ignoring the spirit of the law, which is what Jesus was often trying to teach them about.

I can't believe any God fearing Christian could call themselves such and actually defend the vile filth in the Talmud. It condones sex with kids. It condones and advocates treating non-jews as literal cattle. It condones and advocates wickedness and evil. It condones and advocates practices that try to trick God, like passing their sins onto chickens and then butchering them (a warping of the purpose of the animal sacrifices in the 1st temple), or for putting a wire around their neighborhoods to call it a "home", so they're allowed to do work on the Sabbath, or for ignoring the very purpose of the Sabbath ("Sabbath was made for man, not man for Sabbath").

By the way, when perusing TheDonald about info on the Iran war, I saw your name pop up, and you explicitly defend Israel, and straw man attack anyone who disagrees with the war. Oh, and you post either like a terminally online teenage girl, or someone paid to do it. You're a jewish shill. You think you blend in, but you don't. You glow brighter than the sun.

While what you say is true, I hope everyone understands that we (the U.S., OPEC, NATO, and Israel), have been the much, much bigger belligerent and aggressor in the area, comparative to Iran, or anyone else. To properly analyze a situation and pass correct judgment, we must be honest with ourselves and not be logically inconsistent.

We've bombed almost every nation and people in the area that are opposed to Israel, or in the way of the Greater Israel project, or oppose central banking, or oppose the use of the petro dollar, or have tried to institute a gold backed currency (circumventing the petro dollar and central bankers). Numerous times, we've armed, trained, funded, manned, and often led "rebel" groups, that have started or become terrorist groups later on. For example, the Taliban, which we initially supported to oppose the Soviets, and who later became our enemies because of 9/11, due to the war propaganda to get us involved in Afghanistan, to protect poppy fields, which resulted in the opioid crises in the U.S., even though the government knew Bin Laden wasn't in Afghanistan, and that the Taliban wasn't guilty of 9/11 (Israel and the CIA were). Another example is the Libyan rebels we armed and supported to oust Gaddafi, because he was instituting a gold backed currency, which would be harmful to the petro dollar and the bankers. Another example is the Syrian civil war, which was entirely caused by the West, as we (the CIA and Mossad) created, manned, led, trained, armed, and funded the rebel factions which turned into ISIS, leading to the deaths of millions. The CIA and Israel also used their control of the media to put out fake stories of Assad using chemical weapons against his own people, and, one of the primary reasons we wanted to oust Assad is that he was in the way of the Greater Israel project.

If we're being honest, if we're being logically consistent, we would understand why Middle Easterners hate Americans, we would understand why Iran calls us "big Satan", and why they've used proxy forces to attack us for decades, because we've been neck deep in bullshit over there (out own doing), for decades.

We don't have to take the false position that Islam is good, or that Muslims are friendly, to know that we (the people in power of the West) are the bad guys, and that what we're doing to Iran is just an extension of a long line of evil we've perpetrated. Remember, that false dichotomies are how the people in power manipulate us. We don't have to accept or fall into their traps.

You know the text of Revelation 2:9, but you seem to be missing the point. Modern jews aren't actually "jews" of the Old Testament. The term "jew" comes from Judean, a term for the people who inhabited Judea under Roman occupation. Old Testament "jews" were more accurately pre-Christians, who believed in the coming Messiah, first mentioned in Genesis 3:15. Modern jews are deniers of the Messiah (Christ), and practice Babylonian Saturn/Satan worship via the Talmud (the "whore of Babylon" mentioned elsewhere in Revelation), which inverts and warps all the commandments God laid out in the OT. Modern jews are not Old Testament "jews", which is why they claim to be jews, but aren't (the wording of Rev 2:9), and are the Synagogue of Satan. God cut the veil of the 2nd temple completely in 2, from top to bottom (literally), when Jesus was crucified, signaling that there was no more barrier between man and God, except through Jesus. God also completely destroyed the 2nd temple, via the Romans, in 70 AD, which completely prevents all future jews after that date from properly practicing the old jewish customs, and even furthermore by miscegenating or entirely destroying the 12 tribes of Israel through Assyrian, Babylonian, and Roman conquests. In essence, modern jews are fake jews, who can't properly practice the religion as laid out by God. Don't believe me? Just read the requirements God laid out in the OT. Modern jews, even orthodox religious ones, are breaking numerous rules all the time.

The modern DNA studies that Israel did of modern jews shows this conclusively. Those DNA studies showed that modern jews have almost zero DNA connections to the Middle East. This is why Israel banned DNA testing of Israelis after this came to light. Modern jews have so little ties to the Middle East that the majority of them have allergies to olive tree pollen, which is native to the region they claim is their "ancient homeland".

He's been relegated to one of his own forums that he mods, called c/feminism, where he basically just talks to himself.

Hegseth's argument here is essentially saying "Iran started it by fighting us with proxy forces while we were involved in other conflicts."

He's being a complete hypocrite here, by demonizing what Iran did, while tacitly condoning what we and Israel have been doing for decades, all over the planet. We've toppled governments, assassinated political leaders, regime changed, committed false flags to get us involved in wars, killed millions of innocent people, and funded, armed, trained, created, and led numerous guerrilla and terrorist groups to achieve the same.

If Hegseth, or any of the other neocon warmongers, were being logically consistent, they'd have to label the United States and Israel as the worst offenders and immediately start bombing Washington D.C. and Tel Aviv.

I loathe hypocrites. May God pour out His wrath on all of them.

They're realizing that they need better PR to manipulate the public, and that their normal propaganda outlets (the mainstream news, TV, and Hollywood), have lost much of their power, and that the red pilling has been occurring exclusively on the internet, mostly outside of the mainstream centralized websites that they control (like Facebook). Thus, they're shifting more resources toward manipulating smaller internet forums.

On the bright side, even the dimly lit and aware people can spot these shills a mile off. They're incredibly easy to spot and give themselves away immediately. Signs to look for:

1. They're liars.

2. They're hypocrites and constantly use logical fallacies, and are never logically consistent on anything. For example, they use false dichotomies, ad hominems, appeals to emotions, popularity, and authority, appeals to ignorance, constantly ask for sources when disagreeing, but never site their own sources, etc. They never argue in good faith. They always attack the person rather than the argument, because they know they have none.

3. They're bloodthirsty, crave death, and salivate over it like demons. While it's relatively normal to wish for justice against one's enemies, these shills go way beyond it, to celebrating the deaths of innocents, especially children. The more brutal the more they salivate in approval.

4. They're obsessed with sex and sexual innuendo. They insert it into every conversation. This usually occurs if you disagree with them.

5. They're obsessed with feces and the anus.

6. They use alts and vote manipulation to sway conversations and drive genuine people away.

7. They all speak the same, often using the exact same words and arguments.

8. Their arguments and positions are updated in real time, often switching 180 degrees within a very short time frame, depending on the situation.

9. They sport very specific ideologies, depending on the forum and circumstance. For example, right wing shills sport individualism, militarism, neocon warmongering and globalist interventionism, race blindness, judeo-Christianity, consumerism, and the mainstream (false) right wing politicians and politics. Left wing shills sport different, yet similar, talking points and ideologies. They cater their propaganda to their target audience (i.e. they shapeshift).

10. They're extremely and vociferously anti-White.

11. They're extremely and vociferously anti-Christian. They're the biggest anti-Christians on earth. However, they do try to push judeo-Christianity, churchianity, and the modern corrupted version they've had a hand in. They often mistakenly say "g-d", which is a jewish thing, because they falsely think they can't say the name of God, which gives themselves away really quickly.

12. They're rabidly pro-jew, over all other considerations.

We supplied Israel with all of its armaments over decades. We're involved whether directly or not.

Also, the Pentagon trackers were on track for this, too. Gay bar attendance was down, and pizza deliveries were up. The fact that I have to even utter that sentence as proof of anything is damned insane.

Which is entirely the purpose and pathway for false leaders. They capture the political dissidents, and slowly over time bring them back into the globohomo fold.

No, I didn't block this community.

Maaaybe. But, the bug only appeared recently, and I've been subscribed to this community and have seen their posts since they came over from Reddit.

Except, I am (or at least was) subscribed to this community.

There are definitely variances between presidents, but truly, they all have to keep deficit spending and money printing by the trillions, or the entire system collapses.

That, or he started to go against them in some way, so he's being punished. Same way Trump is being punished by the Epstein files being released (even though heavily redacted, and not all of them), because Trump isn't currently at war with Iran. *This is just one theory as to why the files were released.

Also, Trump said he's devaluing the dollar intentionally, because he wants more people to trade in it. He must do this, because lots of nations are separating themselves from the dollar, which continues to weaken it, collapsing the ponzi scheme of the fiat petro dollar. The system is getting closer to collapse.

There are "studies" by (people who are invested in this topic) that """prove""" generational trauma exists and is really super bad.

I'll give you one guess on who those people are, what event they're talking about, and what narrative they're pushing. The fact that these "studies" are "peer reviewed" and published in academic journals shows how insane and corrupt the entire system is.

This is the issue. It's just far deeper than most people realize.

Modern jews worship Saturn deities through the Talmud. Various names for Saturn deities back then include Baal, Moloch, Remphan, Chiun, and Kiyyun. These Saturn occults all involved the same things, like sexual degeneracy and child sacrifice. The Talmud, Saturn occult stuff, and their "magic" (like numerology, Kabbalah, etc.) came from their neighbors, especially in Babylon and Canaan. This is why the Talmud largely originates from Babylon. The Talmud is an inversion of every law and commandment made by God in the Old Testament. Through jewish legalese they twist words and intent to "interpret" very clear things to mean the exact opposite.

I don't have concrete proof of this, but I'm pretty sure Saturn is associated with Satan. Lucifer used to be associated with Venus (the morning star/light), but when Satan was cast out of Heaven, he became associated with the farthest visible planet to the naked eye (Saturn), symbolizing Satan being far from God's light. Saturn deities are also associated with eating children.

Jews love the number 6. Saturn is the 6th planet from the sun. It has a hexagram shaped storm on its northern pole. Man was made on the 6th day of creation in Genesis (notice how they revere themselves, rather than the full creation cycle of 7 days). They even venerate the star of Remphan, which many people falsely believe is the star of David (David never had a star), and they even put it on the Israeli flag. The 6 symbology is all over the star of Remphan, which has 6 smaller equalateral triangles, a hexagram in the middle, and has 6 points and 6 lines. The interior angles of the triangles are also 60 degrees. I'm almost positive the star of Remphan is the mark of the beast mentioned in Revelation. It tracks precisely to how it's described, and how it's tied to the "whore of Babylon" and those who claim the be jews but aren't, but are the synagogue of Satan. DNA studies of modern jews show almost no genetic ties to ancient Israelites, which is why Israel banned genetic studies after this came to light.

All of modern jew's behavior, practices, and beliefs, are intricately tied to Saturn occults, and their rebukes by God, Jesus, and the apostles, all over the Old and New Testament. Their sexual degeneracy, child sacrifice, abortion, feminism, transgenderism, pedophilia, belief in goyim being lesser, the Talmud itself, legalese mindset, atheism and Satanism, their lying and trickery, their hatred of Christianity and Christians, their belief in sex and blood magic, ritualistic torture, rape, and cannibalism of Christian children, why they've been kicked out of so many locations, their insular nepotism, their worship of money (Mammon), all of it is explained and understood through the history of these vile people. If you understand the history, you'll never be fooled by them, and can predict everything they'll do.

This is one of the best ways to spot lies and liars. If they're not logically consistent in their actions and beliefs, it means they're lying.

For example, if their outward stated purpose for attacking Iran is because "gotta protect the downtrodden protestors", then they're lying, because if that were true and they were logically consistent, we'd have to be engaged all over the planet to help the poor downtrodden folk. We haven't done that, so they're hypocrites only telling slightly plausible lies to fool the gullible.

Another example, if they claim the attack on Iran is about denuclearization, then they're lying, because if denuclearization of dangerous nations was a priority, we'd have attacked Israel decades ago, and assuming their neocon propaganda to be true, we'd also attack Russia, China, Korth Korea, and Pakistan. We haven't done these things, so it's an obvious hypocrisy and lie.

This is why logic and consistency are so crucial for us. It's not necessarily to help convince normies in arguments, but to help us spot lies and liars.

That's one of the reasons this new MAGA variant of neocon warhawking is pissing me off so much. They're apparently fine with doing exactly the same things we've been doing for decades, the things they claim to be against (neocons, warhawking, regime change, needless wars, enriching globalists and military industrial complex), the things they claimed to like about Trump's campaign promises (LOL), but so long as it's concentrated and doesn't last long, they're fine with it. Bunch of spineless hypocrites.

If they actually held to their morals and virtues, it wouldn't matter how long or short an evil things lasts, because they'd be against it regardless.

Worse, some of the boomers over at Jim's blog are all in on this. It is driving me nuts how they can fall for the same trick that has been used to get this fake and gay country into desert wars for decades now. Decades.

I've been seeing lots of people (probably including lots of bots) on TheDonald swallow the excuses for our attack on Venezuela and why we kidnapped Maduro. Excuses like "he's funneling drugs into the U.S.", to "Venezuela helped facilitate the 2020 election steal", to "Hamas has terrorist cells in Venezuela", to "the Venezuelan people want us there", and those idiots are swallowing all of it. They swallow it just enough for the news cycle to change topics, so they don't think on it too much, and realize how awfully stupid and blatantly false it is.

Apparently, to convince the normies on why we have to invade [insert country here], they just have to be fed a few slightly plausible lies told by a few "experts", and it's apparently enough for them. For the people still sycophanting over Trump, being told about Hamas, drugs, and election stealing is enough. I can't believe anyone would be retarded enough to think Venezuela of all places was central to manipulating our election results, when most of the people involved are right here in our own country. It's insane that anyone could believe the "drugs bad" angle for why we attacked Venezuela, because if that were the case, we should be attacking dozens of countries, many with far more guilt of funneling drugs (like Mexico), not to mention the largest importer of drugs is the CIA and our own government.

The same kinds of weak excuses were given for Afghanistan (Bin Laden was there, and the Taliban was behind 9/11), to Iran (they're "2 weeks" from getting nukes!), to backing the "rebels" in Syria (Assad used chemical weapons on civilians), to backing the rebels in Libya (Gaddafi is an evil despot), to backing the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt (it was the "arab spring" and we support "democracy"), to invading Iraq the second time (Saddam had WMDs!), to invading Iraq the first time (Saddam was ripping babies out of incubators!), to Viet Nam (they attacked our boats!), etc.... Every single excuse was a lie. Every single one. And yet, many idiot right wingers still believe the lies.

I hope we do attack Iran. I hope the lies become so ridiculously obvious it's like dropping a bag of hammers on the head of every idiot still swallowing the propaganda. I hope their idiocy actually physically injures them. I pray every day for God to show everyone how thoroughly and completely they've been lied to, and every day God answers my prayers.

Because standard of living will continue to decline if the Fed keeps printing infinite money, if the federal government keeps overspending by trillions, and if usury and fractional reserve banking/lending continue to exist. These are the reasons the dollar keeps losing value, and has since 1913. If those aren't stopped, we're headed toward complete collapse (not just economic), because no one except the ultra rich will be able to afford food. Jobs won't be worth it any more, so people would rather revolt than work a job that doesn't pay their bills. The exact same thing happened to Rome before it collapsed, which devalued their currency so much that the mercenaries they hired to police their borders refused to be paid in Roman currency. These trends can't continue indefinitely, no matter what the corrupt or retarded economists say.

The grimmer it gets, the fewer excuses people have, the more the corrupt system collapses, the more obvious the lies and the truth, the more people will wake up, the more people willing to take corrective action, the more likely that corrective action will occur, and the closer to collapse we get, to entirely rob the evil of power.

It's just a different time frame of the "2 more weeks" blue balling. They string people along for as long as possible with "BREAKING" news, thinking something is going to happen or be done to fix our problems, but nothing of substance ever comes of it. It's just another form of control that the people in power use to control the populace, keeping us docile for as long as possible, hoping we remain peaceful and "voting harder [current year]", while their plans continue to be implemented. Specifically, they hope White people remain peaceful as long as possible while the Kalergi plan is implemented. Once you see how and why they implement all these control measures, it becomes very obvious and easy to spot.

Yes, there was brigandine, which consists of overlapping plates bound together in cloth or leather, and there was certainly cheaper armor in the past, but that's not what's shown in the pic. The pic is showing articulating plate armor, which does not and has never articulated so high up on the breastplate, nor has it ever had "styled" articulation points like that, which serve no purpose, and actually hinders the purpose and functionality of the armor and articulation points. If this is supposed to be some kind of articulating leather or lamellar armor, it's even more laughable.

[edit] It looks like this pic isn't from Nolan's new movie, but from a 2023 movie called "Knights of the Zodiac".