10
AntonioOfVenice 10 points ago +10 / -0

No, we can't fucking help you, you entitled bastard, but if your arm is that important to your subjective well-being, we can kill you if you want.

8
AntonioOfVenice 8 points ago +8 / -0

If that's not a wake up call to get ultra healthy and take care of yourself a lot I don't know what is.

My father once said to never put your well-being in the hands of others, since they don't care nearly as much about you as you do. It seems bloody obvious, but there are so many people who make bad decisions so that they are.

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

My 'insight' is that like you, I have absolutely no idea what is a better or worse system.

People criticize the British system, but the NHS seems to be loved by the British (to be fair, the same applies to grooming gangs). And people criticize the American system, but Americans seem to like their system as well. America is far richer than Europe, so it's not as if we could get a system with the quality of America (whether one thinks it is good or bad) by just adopting the system - that would bankrupt us.

For every argument for or against the system, there's another one refuting it. I'd be very arrogant to think that I in my infinite wisdom managed to figure out what apparently no one else can. And I don't want to be the guy who argues one position because he happens to live in a country which of course is much better than those Yankees, or to argue another position because my political tribe argues for it.

My own experience living in a country with 'universal healthcare' is that I have no complaints about urgent care, which I've always found excellent, but they don't seem to be able or willing to help anything that isn't a serious objective threat (like insomnia or pain).

11
AntonioOfVenice 11 points ago +11 / -0

Excuse me, I don't think you're giving the Canadian system enough credit.

You're suggesting that people die because they don't get Canadian 'care', rather than because they do get it.

How dare you impugn the honor of their lethal injections?

9
AntonioOfVenice 9 points ago +9 / -0

Canada in a nutshell: no, we can't solve your medical issues, but if life has become unbearable for you, we'll gladly help you kill yourself.

3
AntonioOfVenice 3 points ago +3 / -0

Unfortunately, there are people who watch that sub in order to get users and the sub itself into trouble.

8
AntonioOfVenice 8 points ago +8 / -0

Kamala Harris is the last person to be calling others weird. This is probably just an attempt to prevent the line from being used on her.

Trump called Warren Goofy. That is the best nickname for Goofy Kamala.

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +3 / -1

They did the same with Obama, but Obama had intelligence and charisma.

If he was going around saying that schoolbuses are yellow and that their wheels go round, he wouldn't have gotten anywhere, as Harris indeed got nowhere except by being promoted beyond her capabilities by Willie Brown & Senile Joe.

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your boys don't give sitewide bans... at all. In fact, if they remove one of your posts, you are highly unlikely to get a sitewide ban over it to begin with.

4
AntonioOfVenice 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's not "cucking" when they never had any loyalty towards the people to begin with.

3
AntonioOfVenice 3 points ago +3 / -0

Crusader is also Catholic.

Any Anglican crusades? Other than against monasteries?

4
AntonioOfVenice 4 points ago +6 / -2

Good. The RAF refused to hire white people for a very long time. They don't even hire actual British people, why would they deserve the noble name 'Crusader'.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +2 / -1

I perfectly explained how your definition of white supremacy necessarily designates all white peoples as white supremacists if they meet the following three conditions:

And I addressed all of it in the very comment you're replying to here, which you completely ignored, of course - preferring to repeat yourself, the sign of your very high IQ.

So by your definition of white supremacy

Not mine. The historical, actual definition. Of course, you being a follower of the media, prefer CNN's definition.

I’m starting to think you’re just low IQ.

You got it. Only you had an IQ high enough to figure out that "people called white supemacists aren't actually that" = "KILL ALL WHITE PEOPLE". Hell, you have such a high IQ that I recommend that you start watching Rick and Morty and posting on Reddit.

6
AntonioOfVenice 6 points ago +6 / -0

Two things can be true at the same time. Kamala is hard on the innocent and soft on the guilty.

5
AntonioOfVenice 5 points ago +6 / -1

I doubt it is crowd control. If it's only KIA2, it might be a requirement that only approved users post. Contact an active moderator to get approved submitter status.

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think the Proper Black guy is from a different family, while the white platinum hair is from the Targaeryen family. Now, supposedly these interbred with one another, but without changing the color of the black family. Just like in Dune, we had Fremen looking like Bedouins and Fremen looking like proper unadulterated black sub-Saharans - apparently, you're only allowed to marry someone of your own race among the Fremen.

It's so ridiculous. And no, it's not addressed. At least we don't get lectures about wacism - thank God for small mercies.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

No I'm not, it's all over the place these days

OK, now can you give me a few examples?

Wrong this is a classic example of double think,

Only on your part. Because they definitely cannot be simultaneously be proud of their bad behavior and get angry at people documenting it because they're really ashamed of it.

They larp like they're proud of themselves but when it starts spreading into their private lives and even their normie family members notice their degenerate behaviour they start screeching about it.

Yeah, so that means that they really are ashamed.

0
AntonioOfVenice 0 points ago +2 / -2

We all know women for whom attention is the be all and end all. That is very different from saying that women's lives revolve around getting attention. You need a little bit more than a hunch and an aversion towards women to be able to substantiate that.

3
AntonioOfVenice 3 points ago +3 / -0

They are WOMEN, bigoted bastard.

6
AntonioOfVenice 6 points ago +6 / -0

They were awful, and yet I kept watching...

I'd say that House of the Dragon is less bad actually than the last few seasons of GOT. The dialogue and storylines are better, but there's also more wokeness and perversion inserted.

To be specific, a lot revolves around "women being oppressioned", characters are bizarrely made black, and there's some unnecessary sexual perversion inserted.

As Dag says, there are no characters from GoT, and the 'fanservice' in terms of callbacks is limited.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

But why do they reflexively support Western foreign policy?

I think we assume a doctrinaire element to the normie 'beliefs' that simply isn't there. Isn't "whatever the media is saying" the more persuasive explanation"?

3
AntonioOfVenice 3 points ago +5 / -2

Game of Thrones and House of the Dragon.

I'm deeply ashamed, pls no bully.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›