2
8theBritish 2 points ago +2 / -0

Blue wave 2026!

The walls are closing in on that sexist patriarchal cheeto!

4
8theBritish 4 points ago +4 / -0

Cool, this means the natalist elite can stop flooding us with brown retards right?

1
8theBritish 1 point ago +1 / -0

If it's anything like that one about female cops with "I am woman" playing in the background, then I'm looking forward to it.

Where are you posting it to? Aren't you banned from c/funny or something?

9
8theBritish 9 points ago +9 / -0

According to imp it might as well be "anyone with a positive opinion about women."

9
8theBritish 9 points ago +9 / -0

"White genocide isn't real!" she says.

All while admitting that Europe is importing hordes of brown mussies to replace the natives, because they breed like rabbits.

4
8theBritish 4 points ago +4 / -0

Bombing German women good. Because they were the only reason Germany joined the war apparently.

Bombing British women bad. Despite having the ability to vote since 1928 and running successful campaigns to guilt trip men into the previous meat grinder.

Anyways, does this mean you're leaving scored for good like that other troon or are you retreating to c/"Wizards"VsMatriarchy and whining about "muh nazi death threats" like some 2016 feminist?

Oh, and I'm sure the Americans will be happier once they defeat those ebil woman worshipping natalists by voting for a party that did more for feminism in the last decade than Christianity ever did. Remember which party was all about "smashing the patriarchy" impstradamus?

4
8theBritish 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, the group who've propagandized men into finding women attractive in the first place will be defeated by...

The party that tried to get Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris elected?

But you heard it people, the party that spent the last decade whining about "mansplaining", "rape culture", and "muh wage gap" are definitely better!

1
8theBritish 1 point ago +1 / -0

With how shit the CCP have been throughout their entire existence, the fact they haven't revolted is entirely on the Chinese people.

You think overpopulation is what would have broke the camel's back? This is China we're talking about. They'd probably just eat the extra children.

And look at that, they're facing the issues of an aging population and labour force shortages now.

1
8theBritish 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Game with wedding skins is bad because it's natalist propaganda!"

And cod was propaganda for the military industrial complex during the war on terror. I don't see you getting pissy about Activision pumping out shooters and getting more young bucks comfortable going into a meat grinder despite constantly going "All wars (except WW2) are feminist wars!".

Even then, if having two canonically married characters in a game get wedding skins is enough to classify as "natalist propaganda", then I guess games like men at war assault squad or cod world at war are "natalist propaganda" too for letting you win as the nazis or soviets.

At this point why not start your own "tropes vs antinalists" video series?

Hell, I can already imagine it.

"There you are, playing your gacha game with your favourite waifu. All of a sudden... You're a natalist!"

14
8theBritish 14 points ago +14 / -0

Bombing of german cities good, because they let women into power.

Bombing of future terf island spawn points bad, despite letting them vote 20 years before the war started.

And why exactly do you care about what happened centuries ago to a little girl from bumfuckistan nahweri anyway?

So what if she was underaged? She was still a member of a feminist natalist cult by birthright on account of her being female. And it's not like you give a shit about what happens to little girls.

1
8theBritish 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just because you didn't have kids of your own doesn't mean you can't contribute to raising the next generation in some way.

If you've got siblings with kids, volunteer to babysit. It'll help save money and let them take a break from handling the brats.

It might not be for everyone, but some of the best times of my life were when I had to babysit my nephews because their parents were busy.

1
8theBritish 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's lots of reasons to live besides banging loose broads.

It can be something as simple as wanting to hop on another game of Halo 3 with your mates like in the old days or wanting to see the rest of your family on the holidays.

2
8theBritish 2 points ago +2 / -0

Clearly this is a feminist ploy to get men angry that they can't play their vidya anymore, which will fill them with so much pent up rage that they'll go outside and rape the first woman they see.

Which will end with the women getting pregnant, becoming single mothers and further straining the welfare system.

All according to plan of the natalist feminist elite who wish to raise birthrates into the sky while also keeping all women safe from any sort of male danger and treating them like queens.

10
8theBritish 10 points ago +10 / -0

This is coming from the same guy that thinks the US is going to have a blue wave in 2026 and that it will somehow be a good thing.

The same political party that tried electing a female US president twice. Which also has Israel hating mussies in its ranks like Ilhan Omar and Mamdani.

1
8theBritish 1 point ago +1 / -0

So, a name list of pedo politicians getting released would somehow expose the natalist grift that's been going on since Adam first fucked Eve?

And women have been getting treated better than men long before Trump's first term, this is less him giving them more privilege and more him refusing to take privilege away.

If that's considered "giving them the world and more" then they've already had it since the US passed the 19th amendment.

2
8theBritish 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's a politician, of course he's going to lie. He hasn't arrested Hillary, he hasn't drained the swamp, and he hasn't released the Epstein files. And considering the amount of men possibly involved with those I'd hardly call them "feminist" issues.

And you know what, how exactly have women been given the world and more?

They keep whining online that no one wants to date them. Their last two attempts at electing a female US president went horribly, the intersectional grift isn't working with how the tranny community has turned against them, they live in fear of getting turned into handmaid's tale style baby factories because of Project 2025 and people don't care as much when they whine about "muh patriarchy" or "muh wage gap".

11
8theBritish 11 points ago +11 / -0

I don't think he ever ran on making women's lives worse in the first place.

If you expected him to repeal the 19th amendment and usher in the age of the handmaid's tale, then you can go and join the rest of the people who got fed up with being told to wait 2 more weeks for him to either drain the swamp or fix the border.

15
8theBritish 15 points ago +15 / -0

Admitting that mentally ill porn brained fags will never be women is just common sense.

Is this the same Trump that feminists have spent forever trying to paint as a misogynistic sexist? Considering this is you I'm replying to, the better question would be what could he do that wouldn't be for "women's advantage"?

18
8theBritish 18 points ago +18 / -0

Clearly the true opposition to feminism would be your dead subwin where anyone with a remotely different opinion gets banned faster than a 2016 feminist can say "wage gap".

3
8theBritish 3 points ago +3 / -0

How dare you contribute to global warming with such a large carbon footprint!

In all seriousness though, good on you man. Make sure you raise them right.

My only experience with kids is having to babysit my nephews but there's definitely something about watching those rascals get wide eyed with awe at whatever new thing they find that tugs at the heartstrings.

6
8theBritish 6 points ago +6 / -0

"It is not normal to want a large family."

Well considering up until fairly recently most children died before they hit their teens it's not all that surprising. Plus, in ye olden times children were free labor to help out at home or earn a living. There's a reason most civilised countries have child labor laws after all.

Besides, if you treat your kids right and don't raise them to hate you, then you'll have someone to care for you in your old age. Much better to have someone who already loves you and has known you all their life to watch over you than some random nobody in a nursing home. If you have multiple kids, you can have them all take turns taking care of you.

And if your kids have children of their own, you'll be able to give them some advice or take some of the load off their shoulders by keeping your grandkids busy.

by SNES_X
2
8theBritish 2 points ago +2 / -0

Natalists propagandize native population of white Christian tradcucks into not having kids with feminist propaganda.

Natalists see the birth rate of white Christian tradcuck natives plummeting. As more women become man hating, antinatalist feminists.

Natalists import hordes of brown mussies who breed like rabbits to get the birth rates up. Unintentionally causing crime to skyrocket since mussies are incompatible with society. (Despite reports of said crimes apparently being overblown by feminist natalists to get the native population on board with more feminist propaganda somehow?)

Population of white Christian tradcuck natives continues to decrease, while the feminist natalist utopia where women are treated as gods resembles the notoriously sexist middle east.

But there's definitely no such thing as "anti-white". That's clearly a made-up buzzword from salty Boers who definitely are just jealous South Africa is doing better under the blacks.

by SNES_X
4
8theBritish 4 points ago +4 / -0

So, moral busybodies flipflop between sides when the pendulum swings? Colour me shocked.

And let's not forget all those feminists in the last decade calling the single cat lady life "empowering".

1
8theBritish 1 point ago +1 / -0

As if you wouldn't be calling it "gooner brainrot" if we were perfectly happy with the character design either.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›