Why are you trying to say it's "results I don't like", when I clearly said 'the fortifiers admitting to fortifying elections should be sufficient reason to invalidate the results'?. It has nothing to do with me.
Methinks you protest too much. Why?
I see you've completely ignored the observation that 'use US$, become us asset' dig because it hit dead center of your argument.
That's what a blockade looks like. What did you expect? It's not like the Houthis can blockade Israeli ports directly.
So they're reduced to attacking random ships, then claiming that they're somehow 'israel owne- UHHH I mean israel-afilliate- UHHH I mean they maybe stopped at israel I think so they're israeli assets! Obey me or else I'll put a jihad on you!'
Yeaaaaaah no. Fuck that and fuck them.
If you invest in a company you're affiliated with that company. Or do you think you're allowed to invest in companies that are hit with 'you're not allowed to to do business with them' sanctions by your own government?
Companies aren't state actors, though.
Barely any commercial ship is owned by the nations government. Please don't stoop to that level.
There you go. And that's why they should not be attacked in the name of 'muh war'.
You didn't post a single article from before October 7th. Are you referring to the UAE vessel? The same UAE that has been at war with the Houthis for quite a while now?
I quote you - "Barely any commercial ship is owned by the nations government. Please don't stoop to that level."
"The group owner of the bulker was also listed on the US stock market index NASDAQ, which was identified as the likely reason for the attack," it said."
Wew. By your logic, anyone using US$ as currency is a US asset.
Mediterranean Shipping Company ships to Israel. Same goes for Hapag-Lloyd. So both companies are Israeli-affiliated.
Was that specific ship headed to Israel? The answer is no. Also damn, apparently selling anything to Israel makes one 'israel affiliated'? What next, investing 50,000$ in their businesses makes me an honorary jew? LOL
UK owned ship. UK was engaging Houthis militarily at that time if I recall correctly.
Again, not traveling to Israel. And again, not owned by the the british government.
So no. You didn't prove me wrong.
Sure did. You lot always come up with the frailest excuse to sate the greed your kind always has for the work of others. I see you've ignored the link about them attacking shipping even before hamas decided to fuck itself over by committing the october 7th massacred, though.
How to fix everything in the middle east:
Provide covert assistance to Iran in developing nukes. Provide rocket systems to attack israel.
Hijack missile guidance system, hit major middle eastern capitals, oil fields and places like mecca, jerulsalem, etc with failing nukes that just 'fizz'.
"Iran developed missiles because it could not compete, then attacked the nations that had left it in AD 600. We will now remove all US troops and equipment from the middle east to focus on our own boders. Drill baby drill!"
Sell war footage on pay per view to get money back.
Are you now saying that Egypt is the poor country that can't defend itself against the Houthis?
That's your argument, not mine.
What argument are you even trying to make?
What I'm saying is some nations have to use other flags because of myriad reasons, the Marlboro Canal being one of them.
They have taken hostages multiple times.
Proof enough that they don't really care about 'gaza' and just want to attack 'non-muslims' for whatever reason they come up with.
And how exactly are hostages related to I quote 'the entire produce of a small rural farming family goes up in flames.'?
Check how many vessels were damaged or sunk, deliveries left to rot as reefer systems failed. Then you'll understand.
The Houthis own the insurance companies now or how exactly does that benefit them financially?
You have no idea how these crooked megacorps and their jihadi buddies really run, do you?
I asked for cases from before the Gaza war.
Cut the bullshit, you asked for "Do you have an example of where they've deliberately attacked a ship or shipping company that doesn't fall under said criteria?" and I provided it. Typical of your kind to weasel away from your original claims.
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01-09-02-0315 Muslims have always attacked international shipping. The houthis aren't anything new.
The reason why you're suddenly asking for cases before the gaza war is because you want to deflect away from what the houthis did.
That the Houthis have been attacking ships in any way connected to Israel i.e. moving to or from Israeli ports and/or being owned by Israel affiliated companies? At no point did I question that.
You were trying to claim that no other ships were attacked. I proved you wrong.
You are aware that ship owners choose the flag they're sailing under for financial reasons? And the flag a ship is sailing under tells you nothing about who actually owns the ship?
Thank you for explaining that you have no understanding of the Marlboro Canal.
Houthis aren't committing acts of piracy for financial gain. What they're doing is waging a war against Israel in support of Gaza.
Tell that to the insurance companies raking up the cash.
You serious?
They have taken hostages multiple times.
Please do.
You completely disregarded everything I posted so far, so I'll pass. But hey, muslims always suck up and cover for each others crimes. Just look at the rape clans in bongistan.
https://alfasselnews.com/en_GB/articles/gc1/features/2024/02/15/feature-05
https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/how-houthi-attacks-red-sea-threaten-global-shipping
In particular, they also tend to attack vessels from poor countries with no way to defend themselves or make any international news. The neo-barbary pirates does not care if the entire produce of a small rural farming family goes up in flames.
I could go on.
A few days after the october 7th massacre. I was talking about how they had threatened to court-martial people raising the alert about Hamas and some whiny fuck butted in with a 'thats a Qatari talking point! No one was court-martialed!'.
The problem with these thugs is that they like being ghetto welfare queens. Lazy, race-baiting grifters who always settle for threatening anyone who calls them out on their bullshit. The fact that these niggers are always being humiliated despite their constant promotion by the lamestream media makes them very angry - and being incapable of introspection, they become dangerous to everyone.
Of course, if they stopped playing the victim, stopped being such welfare leeches and started doing real work instead of depending on being a diversity hire, things would look up. But it won't. They even pull their own kind down if it means feeling better about themselves. Their entire culture is just that; bloated on tax dollars and welfare money, while sneering at the people who contribute the most in tax dollars.
No wonder everyone calls them niggers.
Your commitment to misdirecting attention away from the people who proudly admit to voter fraud through multiple illicit methods in order to blame 'white people' as a whole has been Noticed. Thank you for your continued cooperation.