It means that this disgusting dude: (1) doesn't think his (or government's) job is to fulfill the desires of the American people including those who voted for that government; and (2) recognizes how stupid, apathetic, and easily conditioned the American people are.
The way they couch these sorts of predictions is by saying not that humanity will be wiped out in 5 years but that the amount of greenhouse gases will irrevocably set into motion the eventual extinction of humanity.
This is very interesting. I hadn't heard that before but apparently there are 2 other examples of this in mammals (a type of hamster and Tasmanian devils). That said, there are at least 2 important differences: (1) the precancerous cells in the fake meat (which I have no desire to eat) aren't human cells and my understanding is you can't "catch" cancer from the cells of a different species; (2) in terms of something ending up in your body, my understanding is that the stomach is the safest place for it to enter by a massive margin. Actual meat has plenty of potential undesirable stuff in it as well (like fecal matter) that wouldn't be in fake meat but that your stomach generally handles.
EDIT: The Bloomberg article that forms the basis of this Blaze article is significantly more interesting.
Women will still have their primary purpose which is to vote for technocratic governments in massive, reliable numbers. Any group that can be swayed by grievance (even when totally unreasonable) into a voting bloc will continue to be catered to in society.
I'm sorry but this is absolutely nothing. A company that was a partial subsidiary of a company that Vivek ran developed technology that in and of itself is not a problem. Pfizer then took that technology and used it in their shitty vaccines that a bunch of people who are also not Vivek forced people to take. Then those companies fulfilled their fiduciary duty to their shareholders by suing for some of the massive profits Pfizer made from their technology (good, fuck Pfizer, I hope they lose some of their ill gotten gains). This is pathetic and I don't even understand it. Vivek is going to get like 2% of the primary votes. It's bait for morons to react to by doing a massive amount of work to put Vivek's name next to vaccines.
Vivek isn't going to be president but this is a dishonest take. In that clip all he said was the same shit Trump and every other major politician who isn't for open borders says: "legal, merit based immigration can be good but no more illegal immigration." He said nothing about increasing immigration.
Where did you get the $200 billion number? Oh, that's right, your ass.
He obviously got it from the article that he linked which itself cites the Ukrainian government. However, it's not clear what support they have for that number. There are 2 distinctions: (1) money "promised" versus money "sent;" and (2) military assistance versus humanitarian and financial assistance which are counted separately. You are referencing military assistance only. The chart in the linked article that indicates the ~$200B cites the Ukrainian government and the Kiel Institute. I didn't look very much at the Ukrainian site. The Kiel Institute only indicates $48B in total assistance through November 20, 2022. Perhaps the Ukrainian government has some propagandistic talking point wherein they interpret/value certain promises at $196B or perhaps Fox News is pulling that number out of their asses. The Kiel Institute is set to update for recent spending tomorrow so perhaps that will be illuminating.
I think a bigger problem than low IQ is that our culture actively inculcates in these people the idea that they are victims without full access to society and therefore are entitled to break the law and vote for handouts that reinforce that degenerate attitude through the generations.
Yeah. This article is pretty stupid and light on any real argument. It puts the total retail shrinkage loss at under $100B (including non-self checkout related theft) which doesn't seem close to causing an increase in hiring. That's especially true when the level of theft is obviously extremely dependent on the local population. Then it quotes a single attorney who admits he "hates" self checkouts and he's talking about how actually the anti-theft mechanisms for self checkout are too powerful and falsely accuse people of theft.
I can also imagine that the girl they sent it to could be a totally insufferable race hustling teenage girl.
However, "As a Catholic educational institution that seeks to form Women of Faith and Integrity, we view racism as a mortal sin," is the more important story.
This is as much a problem with allowing Neo-Marxist thinking to exist in the open where it has flourished with women. You think that a woman would only be justified in killing a man who was actually abusing her. To their thinking, all men were abusing all women and the institution of marriage itself was the primary mechanism of that systemic abuse. Therefore, any woman would have been justified in killing their husband.
I especially love the "Found the incel," retort that didn't make it into this screenshot. Because only an incel wouldn't understand that women have carte blanche to murder men.
But, again, the problem is a fundamental difference in thinking that can't be resolved with the kinds of responses this guy is making (if it can at all). Which is why the postmodern "truth doesn't matter, only the power to enforce a 'truth' matters," is a self-fulfilling philosophy.
How many times could this have been said about something degenerates were up to? This is the entire idea of the feedback loop between culture and politics. Culture can influence politics, but as has been thoroughly and repeatedly demonstrated, politics can influence culture just as easily. He thinks that, as with many other social issues before, promoting an extreme minority position with government policy and power will eventually (and often faster than people expect) result in the culture changing to accommodate it.