And what's worse, this crowd seems to think it's only right and natural to shit on their "inferiors", which is why the severe need to feel superior. It's not that white people shat on them, it's that they weren't the ones doing the shitting upon all along.
Actually, a lot of sailors can't swim, so that's really no excuse. I've met a lot of NEWFIES who can't fucking swim, and their whole culture is still sea-oriented. Ever notice how superstitious the traditional sailor is stereotroped to be? That's why, most of them had the sense to be terrified of the water. But they went to sea anyway. Because the romance of the open ocean is different from simply being afraid of the water, I guess, for the ones who were actually attracted to the life.
And none of us can flap our arms and fly, but we still get into airplanes/learn how to use them.
It’s no different from feminists. They don’t want “equal rights,” they want superiority, because they believe they’re superior.
No different from feminists at all - They think that white people have more money than them simply because they are white. They either fail to, or refuse to see that the white people who outperform them (the white people who do not outperform them are magically invisible to them) simply make different choices in life that lead them to better results.
Feminists use the exact same bogus logic when talking about 'the wage gap' between men and women.
It doesn't have to be "all" to be a massively destabilizing force on civilization. 1 in 100 peckerwoods can still sustain a high trust society. 3 in 10, and neighbors aren't going to be very neighborly. Demographics are destiny, and there are plenty of legacies to prove it.
When you bring up sports. It reminds me of one of the head coaches in the NBA who recently was fired. The report made it a point to mention that now left "only" 4/30 head coaches that were black. Of course, if you do the math, that leads to a percentage of 13%.
I genuinely wonder what will become of black people if the West ever stops being the dominant culture group.
If the Chinese or Asians in general become the new dominant force. Racial relations between them and blacks or other groups for that matter will probably go back to 1900's level.
Even in the US, Asians despise blacks because of how they are often targeted by blacks. Realistically no one really gives a shit about Asians, they're openly discriminated against even by Leftists for having the audacity of going against the narrative and being successful minorities. So there's a lot of pent up anger and resentment towards the blacks who they see as being undeserving of all the sympathy and support they get.
I don't consider African's and blacks as the same.
Africans are they are because their continent is just a giant shithole. Blacks on the other hand live in 1st world nations but somehow manage to act worse than their African counterparts who literally have to worry about being snatched up by lions or hippos.
That is also why African immigrants outperform native blacks in America by a mile. You have to work hard in order to survive in Africa, you don't get hand-outs because wypipo feel bad. So when they bring that work ethnic to another place, they are very successful.
This is also Thomas Sowell's explanation for why Chinese immigrants to Malaysia do so well: the place in Chinese where they were mostly from was quite barren, and they had to work hard to make a meager living. The native Malaysians were used to getting by without much work, so when they brought their work ethic to Malaysia, they outperformed the natives by a lot.
Fun fact, the hairless elephants and rhinos evolved from the hairy ones. In other words, they evolved alongside human beings who were themselves spreading up towards the north as the "pachyderms" were spreading south. Something about the hairy forms didn't allow them to bear the pressure of the new, SPEAR-WIELDING predator in its midst, especially once they were accompanied by packs of DOGS (which are always, always always glossed over when people argue about cLiMaTe ChAnGe killing species that had survived previous glacial interstitials). Probably had a longer gestation period, and recent DNA studies show that near the end, their genes had been bottlenecked badly so there would have been no coming back from genetic collapse anyway (humans likely targeted the calves, and decimated the populations by attrition that way. Climate change and genetic collapse took over from there.)
The elephants and hippoes are basically just the last of the megafauna that were tough enough to face a spear-using pack animal, but the introduction of guns has really fucked things up, not to mention the, yes, population boom of the past 5-7 human generations.
And frankly, all races are the enemies of wildlife any more. Africans may hate and resent their white-founded nature preserves, but who is it always in the news killing the trophy lions and then bragging up about it bringing money to the niggers? Shithead white trash. Not to mention the sad state of the natural history of North America (helped by the redskins, but hey, whites brought the guns and steel traps.) And now the skies are fucking empty, except for piece of shit airplanes, spreading shit and one big fat ugly invasive species everywhere.
Rhino horn is made of the same substance as your own fingernails, so no, it does nothing.
As for reasons: False, false false. The whites killed mostly for industry. And the pot. The "fun" part was mostly the higher-profile large-game hunting craze of the Victorian era-early 20th century that Hemingway was writing about. The Great Auk went mostly for trayne oil. A lot of birds were also killed because farmers thought they ate seeds (the Eskimo Curlew was mistaken for a seed-eater. It ate bugs as it passed over the prairies on its way back north, and the fact that it, and certain other birds, are now missing is exactly why we need fucking pesticides.) There were also museums that paid money for ever-scarcer specimens (that's why fuck the redskins for whining about their bones and bodies being taxidermed, they were never hunted specifically and bountied for it, like non-humans were, and THEY PARTICIPATED.) The predators were killed because of hatred of predators (a rather hypocritical one, at that.) Rich people hunted for sport, but the poor overkilled for the pot (people used to brag that they could throw rocks or shoot shotguns into flocks of birds, and kill and injure many at a time. They'd go home with wheel barrows full of birds. And now the skies are fucking empty.)
And the Natives also overkilled, all stone agers have done. In fact, it's now suspected that the Little Ice Age was caused by a pre-Columbus plague that decimated the redskin population, which meant they were no longer burning the fuck out of forests any more, and that the non-human populations whites saw were actually populations in recovery. Long-time hunter propaganda insists that the Virginia White-Tailed deer was nearly extinct (and limited to what is now Virginia) because the Natives had been busy doing to them what they had already done to the American megafauna, from Mastodons to giant sloths and beavers .. and I think they actually might be right with that one.
Oh, and whites used to have bullshit apothecary recipes, too. But the Chinese really are the worst and really only care about their fucking dicks.
Because blacks cannot contribute positive to society
They're just responding to incentives. Right now, blacks are rewarded for being lazy, claiming victimhood and burning down entire cities. If they were rewarded for proper behavior, you'd see more of that. There is nothing in blacks that makes them incapable of that.
Everyone responds to incentives, not just children. Asians may have cultural views that are opposed to welfare, and in that sense, that is also an incentive - to not have others look down on you for taking welfare.
I don't see Asians ever claiming victimhood, being lazy, or burning down cities so they can get free money out of it. Even if it possible, I don't see Asians doing it.
Neither do I. Proper behavior is such a part of their culture. That is not the case with blacks, so they are vulnerable to the incentives provided.
They do not comprehend what is right and wrong?
You have to be properly raised for that, and 70% of them do not even have a father. So of course things are going to derail.
The Japanese in WWII internment camp never claimed Victimhood. The Chinese railroad workers were mistreated and never claimed victimhood. Of course when you compare both countries to any black countries, you can see why Asian countries are successful.
Black culture is not the same everywhere. Look at Nigerians, and you will see immigrants who are successful in part due to having some of the same valuable cultural assets as Asians.
Asians are genetically different from black regardless of their culture or not.
All races differ genetically. Very likely, it is also not that every race has an equal amount of average intelligence potential. This plays a part. But culture does as well.
Blacks on the other hand are the only group of people that sell each others to slavery on a grand scale.
This is incorrect. People everywhere used to enslave their neighbors, who are in almost all cases people of the same race. Europeans enslaved non-Christian Slavs, who were also white. They did not think of categories such as 'white' and 'black' in the time, that is a modern pathology.
I don't agree that you need to be properly raised to know basic common sense. I did steal when I was a child, but I had enough common sense and decency to know not to steal from people that never hurted me, or to stab or kill someone for "fun".
It's certainly not my intention to say that people are blameless, only that when there is not a (strong) father figure, more children will be without a moral compass. Combine that with society telling you that you are oppressed and that you can get away with anything, and I think any group would have worse outcomes in that situation.
I know plenty of Asians that didn't grow up with a father ended up being successful. Sure father make a huge difference, but not having a father does not equal to someone committing violent crimes
I think that is because of Asian culture. And because fathers are much more common in Asian communities as a whole, while 70% of black kids don't have fathers. So you have entire communities where fathers are very uncommon and cannot control the kids.
Regarding Nigerians, they may be the smartest of all blacks but that not saying much. Most scammers are Nigerians and in Vietnam, 20+ Nigerian officials have been arrested for various scams and theft
Not all Nigerians are created equal. There are many ethnic groups in Nigeria, and it's the southern Christian Ebo's (long live Biafra) who are the best people. The Northerners are best known for their creation Boko Harm, so yeah.
They aren't smarter than Asians or Whites students no matter what the various charts show, they get 245 points extra on their SAT for being black and when they get average score, they get accepted to every Ivy league because they are seen as a token.
I'm not comparing them to Asians or whites, but pointing out that they outperform native blacks - who also benefit from the 245 point bonus. So why is that? It's clearly not racism, because actual racists don't care if you're an immigrants or native, and it's not that blacks are incapable of achieving stuff.
. If they were so smart, why is Nigeria still third world?
In 1900, Chinese were as smart as they are now, but they were still third world. So I don't think that is a metric.
Nigerian culture is similar to Asian culture than other blacks ethnicity but it far from close because if it was even remotely similar, you would see improvement to Nigeria economy because even poor Asians in Asian countries still outscore many first world countries students on test. There has never been a case of that for Nigeria or any African countries.
I think there is more emphasis among Asians because of, generalizing grossly, Confucian traditions and respect for learning that was exported by China. Africa has only known tribal non-states, so there was never any such tradition. But there can be a tradition of hard work, and in that respect Nigerians are similar.
It’s like a racial matrix. I’m black and can’t believe how many of my cousins feel like we are living in 1920s Alabama. Media and race hustlers have done a superb job pushing victim mentality
dual threat QB (majority blacks) would take over the NFL
Yeah, there are two problems with that idea.
Firstly, that's not a new proposition; the quarterback was far more involved in the physicality of the sport in the early days.
Secondly, the lifespan of a 'dual threat' quarterback is very, very short by comparison to a modern passing-only quarterback. Mostly because running the ball routinely involves getting tackled routinely.
Also running quarterbacks are generally boring for the game. The rules changed specifically to allow more passing because passing made for better games.
They most certainly do not. They have more rights than the rest of us.
If I were shot, even unjustly, no one would bat an eye, but hoodlums getting killed leads to the lying media crying about it for months and riots.
If I get into any sort of altercation with a black man, I instantly get upgraded to "white Middle Easterner" who, being white, obviously is racist - in order to justify destroying me.
If I try to get into a prestigious university, I'll be displaced for a less qualified black applicant. If I try to get a good job, I'll be less likely to be hired than a less qualified black applicant.
Black supremacy is the ideology of every elite institution, from the media to the government and academia.
The question is, are all these extra rights doing them any good? They are not. Problems in the black community remained unaddressed, because people are deathly afraid to even talk about it. Policing in black neighborhoods are forced to back off because of identitarian movements, while criminals run loose and create overwhelmingly black victims.
Black supremacy is an instrument of the radical left, nothing more. Blacks are the mascots of the radical left, used to advance their agenda without the radical left operating in their actual interest.
It like an F's student wanting the same reward as an A's student simply because they believe all grades should be equal. That not how society work.
Give it time.
Why have blacks players if they aren't qualify, just for the sake of diversity or equality?
To the corrupt elites, their black skin is their qualification.
they want special rights
You have to be very careful when talking about 'they'. Most black people simply don't know any better than that they are victims. This is certainly true of the identitarian activists.
They love affirmative action, and they love freebies and handout, anything to give them special privilege despite not reaching on merits alone.
Affirmative action is good for blacks who are not qualified, but it is bad for those who are qualified, as they are lumped in with the unqualified.
Qualify or not, they still get the extra 245 points on the SAT, which is 295 points more than Asians. Asians get deducted 50 points automatically
Which leads them to fail much more often due to mismatch. Unfortunately for the cult, there is no way to try to give race-based privileges without harming that race (as well as all others).
Imagine having all of these special rights and still complaining about "oppression". Meanwhile the group that is most oppress (Asians) aren't even complaining.
Except in some cases, where they are brainwashed by white people, about nonsense like 'cultural appropriation'.
Generalizing people and stereotyping a group is the definition of prejudice ("racism" if you like). It disrespects those who are exemplary, even in cases of positive stereotypes (such as athletic ability of West African descendants). Human beings do have physical genetic differences based on genetics, "race" is real, but we also have unparalleled variances which surpass all generalized traits, making prejudices based on genetics largely useless. Our species learns and develops logic as we grow up, and there's so much genetic diversity that IQ can be wildly different between siblings. "Black people say" and "Black people are" are generalizations which are mostly wrong. I've known plenty of blacks that "behave like white people" (except they're just acting like normal blacks), and plenty of whites who do not behave. There's plenty with more "brain power" than me, that's pretty fuckin' rude to presume blacks are all brawn like that.
You're mixing up race and inner-city culture. Plenty of diversity in the hood. Let me say nobody wants to grow up poor, with less protection and less opportunity, struggling to survive, conforming to a culture that celebrates thugs and has no time for education. Calling the cops on robberies is considered "escalation" to some communities, because the consequences for everyone involved aren't favorable. This distrust of authority isn't some inherent trait, it's learned from encounters with the worst funded and worst trained cops. These communities do not want to "defund the police", but they do want to avoid getting fucked over by police. Resisting arrest is a dumb shit thing to do though, I wouldn't call that a racial thing though, that's a criminal thing.
I'm not sure what you mean with all the sports talk. Do kids still aspire to be in the NFL when they grow up? Times change, and I'm sorry for your loss sports fans.
Identity politics is just plain racism, it's designed for race baiters to get money and power. I don't believe in the past four years that western civilization has become more racist, it's all mud slinging, "divide and conquer". Don't lose track of who's stoking the embers. Hint: BLM isn't representative of the black community.
I never once thought Black Lives didn't matter, who's saying they don't? The BLM organization doesn't seem to have anything to do with protecting the community though, it's a paper thin front for a socialist movement, their slogan is only a distraction from their true aims. They can't hide where their money comes from, and don't bother hiding what their goals are.
A lot of stuff you've said is referring to corporate policies and activist group positions. I hope that you can step back and examine why you think all those things, and you may find that it's not the family downtown that wants free stuff that you have a problem with, but the consultants and lobbyists which preach these racist claims. Don't fight their props, but those who would divide the people to themselves profit.
It would be an interesting experiment to take groups of humans by race and culture, and place each group in a novel environment (like, say, Mars), away from one another, and see if different races of the same culture would evolve differently, and how. The environment would have to be the same and offer the same things to each group starting out, of course.
Oh, you want a rodent model? Then compare fancy rats in a lab, with whatever the hell wild urban rats are getting up to, then. I don't think anyone is really keeping an eye on their behaviour, and I think someone should start.
This experiment is already sort of happening between rural and urban raccoons. The urban raccoons are more device-savvy, becoming more socially organized, and are starting to pop up in new and novel coat colours (which is very much a by-product of the domestication process. And yes, as an aside, I fully expect some shit start to happen in some city somewhere, and people are gonna be like "we dunno what's causing it, all we see on camera is just a bunch of dumb animals ..."
It would be an interesting experiment to take groups of humans by race and culture, and place each group in a novel environment (like, say, Mars), away from one another, and see if different races of the same culture would evolve differently, and how. The environment would have to be the same and offer the same things to each group starting out, of course.
You don't need that, as there are various combinations of races and cultures. For example, you have Bosnia, the only European country with a sizeable native Muslim population. And of course, that country spawns Islamism and terrorism, while the neighboring Serbs and Croats (who are Christian), do not.
You also have Nigeria, where the south is largely Christian and the north Muslim. Guess who does best, and who commits acts of terrorism?
Not all black people, just the Wakandaites, the ones who think they’re literal kings and queens and everyone should bow before them.
It’s no different from feminists. They don’t want “equal rights,” they want superiority, because they believe they’re superior.
And what's worse, this crowd seems to think it's only right and natural to shit on their "inferiors", which is why the severe need to feel superior. It's not that white people shat on them, it's that they weren't the ones doing the shitting upon all along.
Actually, a lot of sailors can't swim, so that's really no excuse. I've met a lot of NEWFIES who can't fucking swim, and their whole culture is still sea-oriented. Ever notice how superstitious the traditional sailor is stereotroped to be? That's why, most of them had the sense to be terrified of the water. But they went to sea anyway. Because the romance of the open ocean is different from simply being afraid of the water, I guess, for the ones who were actually attracted to the life.
And none of us can flap our arms and fly, but we still get into airplanes/learn how to use them.
It's weird, but white people can be surrounded by water, and never once think to learn to swim. They'll just get a log instead, I guess.
Comment Removed: Rule 16
No different from feminists at all - They think that white people have more money than them simply because they are white. They either fail to, or refuse to see that the white people who outperform them (the white people who do not outperform them are magically invisible to them) simply make different choices in life that lead them to better results.
Feminists use the exact same bogus logic when talking about 'the wage gap' between men and women.
It doesn't have to be "all" to be a massively destabilizing force on civilization. 1 in 100 peckerwoods can still sustain a high trust society. 3 in 10, and neighbors aren't going to be very neighborly. Demographics are destiny, and there are plenty of legacies to prove it.
Nah there’s some based ones, like Anthony Brian Logan and Jesse Lee Peterson.
And based blacks are often much more red-pilled in the race issue than 'conservative' white people, who are usually afraid of their own shadow.
Comment Removed: Rule 16
When you bring up sports. It reminds me of one of the head coaches in the NBA who recently was fired. The report made it a point to mention that now left "only" 4/30 head coaches that were black. Of course, if you do the math, that leads to a percentage of 13%.
Your racism is showing.
I genuinely wonder what will become of black people if the West ever stops being the dominant culture group.
If the Chinese or Asians in general become the new dominant force. Racial relations between them and blacks or other groups for that matter will probably go back to 1900's level.
Even in the US, Asians despise blacks because of how they are often targeted by blacks. Realistically no one really gives a shit about Asians, they're openly discriminated against even by Leftists for having the audacity of going against the narrative and being successful minorities. So there's a lot of pent up anger and resentment towards the blacks who they see as being undeserving of all the sympathy and support they get.
I don't consider African's and blacks as the same.
Africans are they are because their continent is just a giant shithole. Blacks on the other hand live in 1st world nations but somehow manage to act worse than their African counterparts who literally have to worry about being snatched up by lions or hippos.
That is also why African immigrants outperform native blacks in America by a mile. You have to work hard in order to survive in Africa, you don't get hand-outs because wypipo feel bad. So when they bring that work ethnic to another place, they are very successful.
This is also Thomas Sowell's explanation for why Chinese immigrants to Malaysia do so well: the place in Chinese where they were mostly from was quite barren, and they had to work hard to make a meager living. The native Malaysians were used to getting by without much work, so when they brought their work ethic to Malaysia, they outperformed the natives by a lot.
If Africa was suddenly marjory hwhite the hippos and lions would be either hunted to extinction or domesticated.
Fun fact, the hairless elephants and rhinos evolved from the hairy ones. In other words, they evolved alongside human beings who were themselves spreading up towards the north as the "pachyderms" were spreading south. Something about the hairy forms didn't allow them to bear the pressure of the new, SPEAR-WIELDING predator in its midst, especially once they were accompanied by packs of DOGS (which are always, always always glossed over when people argue about cLiMaTe ChAnGe killing species that had survived previous glacial interstitials). Probably had a longer gestation period, and recent DNA studies show that near the end, their genes had been bottlenecked badly so there would have been no coming back from genetic collapse anyway (humans likely targeted the calves, and decimated the populations by attrition that way. Climate change and genetic collapse took over from there.)
The elephants and hippoes are basically just the last of the megafauna that were tough enough to face a spear-using pack animal, but the introduction of guns has really fucked things up, not to mention the, yes, population boom of the past 5-7 human generations.
And frankly, all races are the enemies of wildlife any more. Africans may hate and resent their white-founded nature preserves, but who is it always in the news killing the trophy lions and then bragging up about it bringing money to the niggers? Shithead white trash. Not to mention the sad state of the natural history of North America (helped by the redskins, but hey, whites brought the guns and steel traps.) And now the skies are fucking empty, except for piece of shit airplanes, spreading shit and one big fat ugly invasive species everywhere.
Rhino horn is made of the same substance as your own fingernails, so no, it does nothing.
As for reasons: False, false false. The whites killed mostly for industry. And the pot. The "fun" part was mostly the higher-profile large-game hunting craze of the Victorian era-early 20th century that Hemingway was writing about. The Great Auk went mostly for trayne oil. A lot of birds were also killed because farmers thought they ate seeds (the Eskimo Curlew was mistaken for a seed-eater. It ate bugs as it passed over the prairies on its way back north, and the fact that it, and certain other birds, are now missing is exactly why we need fucking pesticides.) There were also museums that paid money for ever-scarcer specimens (that's why fuck the redskins for whining about their bones and bodies being taxidermed, they were never hunted specifically and bountied for it, like non-humans were, and THEY PARTICIPATED.) The predators were killed because of hatred of predators (a rather hypocritical one, at that.) Rich people hunted for sport, but the poor overkilled for the pot (people used to brag that they could throw rocks or shoot shotguns into flocks of birds, and kill and injure many at a time. They'd go home with wheel barrows full of birds. And now the skies are fucking empty.)
And the Natives also overkilled, all stone agers have done. In fact, it's now suspected that the Little Ice Age was caused by a pre-Columbus plague that decimated the redskin population, which meant they were no longer burning the fuck out of forests any more, and that the non-human populations whites saw were actually populations in recovery. Long-time hunter propaganda insists that the Virginia White-Tailed deer was nearly extinct (and limited to what is now Virginia) because the Natives had been busy doing to them what they had already done to the American megafauna, from Mastodons to giant sloths and beavers .. and I think they actually might be right with that one.
Oh, and whites used to have bullshit apothecary recipes, too. But the Chinese really are the worst and really only care about their fucking dicks.
Racial guilt isn't doing them any good, but the invisible hand may yet.
They're just responding to incentives. Right now, blacks are rewarded for being lazy, claiming victimhood and burning down entire cities. If they were rewarded for proper behavior, you'd see more of that. There is nothing in blacks that makes them incapable of that.
Everyone responds to incentives, not just children. Asians may have cultural views that are opposed to welfare, and in that sense, that is also an incentive - to not have others look down on you for taking welfare.
Neither do I. Proper behavior is such a part of their culture. That is not the case with blacks, so they are vulnerable to the incentives provided.
You have to be properly raised for that, and 70% of them do not even have a father. So of course things are going to derail.
Black culture is not the same everywhere. Look at Nigerians, and you will see immigrants who are successful in part due to having some of the same valuable cultural assets as Asians.
All races differ genetically. Very likely, it is also not that every race has an equal amount of average intelligence potential. This plays a part. But culture does as well.
This is incorrect. People everywhere used to enslave their neighbors, who are in almost all cases people of the same race. Europeans enslaved non-Christian Slavs, who were also white. They did not think of categories such as 'white' and 'black' in the time, that is a modern pathology.
It's certainly not my intention to say that people are blameless, only that when there is not a (strong) father figure, more children will be without a moral compass. Combine that with society telling you that you are oppressed and that you can get away with anything, and I think any group would have worse outcomes in that situation.
I think that is because of Asian culture. And because fathers are much more common in Asian communities as a whole, while 70% of black kids don't have fathers. So you have entire communities where fathers are very uncommon and cannot control the kids.
Not all Nigerians are created equal. There are many ethnic groups in Nigeria, and it's the southern Christian Ebo's (long live Biafra) who are the best people. The Northerners are best known for their creation Boko Harm, so yeah.
I'm not comparing them to Asians or whites, but pointing out that they outperform native blacks - who also benefit from the 245 point bonus. So why is that? It's clearly not racism, because actual racists don't care if you're an immigrants or native, and it's not that blacks are incapable of achieving stuff.
In 1900, Chinese were as smart as they are now, but they were still third world. So I don't think that is a metric.
I think there is more emphasis among Asians because of, generalizing grossly, Confucian traditions and respect for learning that was exported by China. Africa has only known tribal non-states, so there was never any such tradition. But there can be a tradition of hard work, and in that respect Nigerians are similar.
Hard truth right there.
In other words, they'll work to death what they can't eat and don't want to farm for organs.
It’s like a racial matrix. I’m black and can’t believe how many of my cousins feel like we are living in 1920s Alabama. Media and race hustlers have done a superb job pushing victim mentality
Yeah, there are two problems with that idea.
Firstly, that's not a new proposition; the quarterback was far more involved in the physicality of the sport in the early days.
Secondly, the lifespan of a 'dual threat' quarterback is very, very short by comparison to a modern passing-only quarterback. Mostly because running the ball routinely involves getting tackled routinely.
Also running quarterbacks are generally boring for the game. The rules changed specifically to allow more passing because passing made for better games.
They most certainly do not. They have more rights than the rest of us.
If I were shot, even unjustly, no one would bat an eye, but hoodlums getting killed leads to the lying media crying about it for months and riots.
If I get into any sort of altercation with a black man, I instantly get upgraded to "white Middle Easterner" who, being white, obviously is racist - in order to justify destroying me.
If I try to get into a prestigious university, I'll be displaced for a less qualified black applicant. If I try to get a good job, I'll be less likely to be hired than a less qualified black applicant.
Black supremacy is the ideology of every elite institution, from the media to the government and academia.
The question is, are all these extra rights doing them any good? They are not. Problems in the black community remained unaddressed, because people are deathly afraid to even talk about it. Policing in black neighborhoods are forced to back off because of identitarian movements, while criminals run loose and create overwhelmingly black victims.
Black supremacy is an instrument of the radical left, nothing more. Blacks are the mascots of the radical left, used to advance their agenda without the radical left operating in their actual interest.
Give it time.
To the corrupt elites, their black skin is their qualification.
You have to be very careful when talking about 'they'. Most black people simply don't know any better than that they are victims. This is certainly true of the identitarian activists.
Affirmative action is good for blacks who are not qualified, but it is bad for those who are qualified, as they are lumped in with the unqualified.
Which leads them to fail much more often due to mismatch. Unfortunately for the cult, there is no way to try to give race-based privileges without harming that race (as well as all others).
Except in some cases, where they are brainwashed by white people, about nonsense like 'cultural appropriation'.
Generalizing people and stereotyping a group is the definition of prejudice ("racism" if you like). It disrespects those who are exemplary, even in cases of positive stereotypes (such as athletic ability of West African descendants). Human beings do have physical genetic differences based on genetics, "race" is real, but we also have unparalleled variances which surpass all generalized traits, making prejudices based on genetics largely useless. Our species learns and develops logic as we grow up, and there's so much genetic diversity that IQ can be wildly different between siblings. "Black people say" and "Black people are" are generalizations which are mostly wrong. I've known plenty of blacks that "behave like white people" (except they're just acting like normal blacks), and plenty of whites who do not behave. There's plenty with more "brain power" than me, that's pretty fuckin' rude to presume blacks are all brawn like that.
You're mixing up race and inner-city culture. Plenty of diversity in the hood. Let me say nobody wants to grow up poor, with less protection and less opportunity, struggling to survive, conforming to a culture that celebrates thugs and has no time for education. Calling the cops on robberies is considered "escalation" to some communities, because the consequences for everyone involved aren't favorable. This distrust of authority isn't some inherent trait, it's learned from encounters with the worst funded and worst trained cops. These communities do not want to "defund the police", but they do want to avoid getting fucked over by police. Resisting arrest is a dumb shit thing to do though, I wouldn't call that a racial thing though, that's a criminal thing.
I'm not sure what you mean with all the sports talk. Do kids still aspire to be in the NFL when they grow up? Times change, and I'm sorry for your loss sports fans.
Identity politics is just plain racism, it's designed for race baiters to get money and power. I don't believe in the past four years that western civilization has become more racist, it's all mud slinging, "divide and conquer". Don't lose track of who's stoking the embers. Hint: BLM isn't representative of the black community.
I never once thought Black Lives didn't matter, who's saying they don't? The BLM organization doesn't seem to have anything to do with protecting the community though, it's a paper thin front for a socialist movement, their slogan is only a distraction from their true aims. They can't hide where their money comes from, and don't bother hiding what their goals are.
A lot of stuff you've said is referring to corporate policies and activist group positions. I hope that you can step back and examine why you think all those things, and you may find that it's not the family downtown that wants free stuff that you have a problem with, but the consultants and lobbyists which preach these racist claims. Don't fight their props, but those who would divide the people to themselves profit.
Word.
No, that's idiocy.
It would be an interesting experiment to take groups of humans by race and culture, and place each group in a novel environment (like, say, Mars), away from one another, and see if different races of the same culture would evolve differently, and how. The environment would have to be the same and offer the same things to each group starting out, of course.
Oh, you want a rodent model? Then compare fancy rats in a lab, with whatever the hell wild urban rats are getting up to, then. I don't think anyone is really keeping an eye on their behaviour, and I think someone should start.
This experiment is already sort of happening between rural and urban raccoons. The urban raccoons are more device-savvy, becoming more socially organized, and are starting to pop up in new and novel coat colours (which is very much a by-product of the domestication process. And yes, as an aside, I fully expect some shit start to happen in some city somewhere, and people are gonna be like "we dunno what's causing it, all we see on camera is just a bunch of dumb animals ..."
You don't need that, as there are various combinations of races and cultures. For example, you have Bosnia, the only European country with a sizeable native Muslim population. And of course, that country spawns Islamism and terrorism, while the neighboring Serbs and Croats (who are Christian), do not.
You also have Nigeria, where the south is largely Christian and the north Muslim. Guess who does best, and who commits acts of terrorism?
Post Removed: Rule 16
they have rights than whites