He's close. Feminism did essentially criminalize men approaching women.
It's feminism. That's it. Women abandoned their critical role as propagators of the species in order to pursue meaningless makework jobs and positions of authority for which they are ill suited. Now they've redirected their unused maternal instincts towards invaders and criminals, accelerating the collapse of civilization in the name of being "nice" to their new "children".
There is no reality in which women spend 75% of their fertility window not having kids and the birthrate doesn't immediately implode. It's fucking math.
And that's before we get into the total destruction of assortive mating thanks to social media. Men and women used to pair off by their relative attractiveness. Now? Social media gases up mid women with easy attention from hundreds or thousands of men. Those mid women think they deserve perfect 10 men and will settle for nothing less.
Or what about the feedback loop created by female hypergamy and DEI hiring and promoting? Women date/mate across and up. Every woman hired to a high paying or high status job is one less man in the "up" dating/mating pool. And not only did that woman displace a man, she also believes that she has elevated her own "status" and shrunk her own dating/mating pool.
How about the fact that white men were given almost no jobs during the pandemic recovery. All of those men were essentially removed from the fucking gene pool. I guess white women will have to turn to non-white men for dating and mating. Institutional soft genocide is awesome.
2/3 of post secondary graduates are women, who then go on to try to have a career, all during their prime child bearing years. The entire "Science needs women" idea is just anti-natalist propaganda.
I think this is right answer. If you look at the graphs, things have been going down hill for 50 years we didn't have social media or dating apps back then, those are symptoms of the problem not the root cause.
It's so obvious too. As long as women don't need men for protection, and can rely on men's government forced handouts in the form of welfare, they'll never settle for a guy that's equal.
Excellent breakdown. I'll add the fact that feminism drives down wages because of obvious principles of supply and demand in the labour market. Homes then become less affordable on the one hand, more suited towards double income households, while on the other hand people feel greater pressure to move to cities for the higher paying jobs, where they'll rent even less affordable property and decline to have children for a growing host of reasons that go hand in hand with urban hellholes.
Surely even some zoomettes are picking up on the fact that their forebears were retards for turning their great granddaughters into urban wageslaves.
He's close. Feminism did essentially criminalize men approaching women.
It's feminism. That's it. Women abandoned their critical role as propagators of the species in order to pursue meaningless makework jobs and positions of authority for which they are ill suited. Now they've redirected their unused maternal instincts towards invaders and criminals, accelerating the collapse of civilization in the name of being "nice" to their new "children".
There is no reality in which women spend 75% of their fertility window not having kids and the birthrate doesn't immediately implode. It's fucking math.
And that's before we get into the total destruction of assortive mating thanks to social media. Men and women used to pair off by their relative attractiveness. Now? Social media gases up mid women with easy attention from hundreds or thousands of men. Those mid women think they deserve perfect 10 men and will settle for nothing less.
Or what about the feedback loop created by female hypergamy and DEI hiring and promoting? Women date/mate across and up. Every woman hired to a high paying or high status job is one less man in the "up" dating/mating pool. And not only did that woman displace a man, she also believes that she has elevated her own "status" and shrunk her own dating/mating pool.
How about the fact that white men were given almost no jobs during the pandemic recovery. All of those men were essentially removed from the fucking gene pool. I guess white women will have to turn to non-white men for dating and mating. Institutional soft genocide is awesome.
2/3 of post secondary graduates are women, who then go on to try to have a career, all during their prime child bearing years. The entire "Science needs women" idea is just anti-natalist propaganda.
Yep, anybody who thinks that women going to school and doing email jobs for 20 of their major developing years is good is either insane or genocidal.
>It's feminism
I think this is right answer. If you look at the graphs, things have been going down hill for 50 years we didn't have social media or dating apps back then, those are symptoms of the problem not the root cause.
It's so obvious too. As long as women don't need men for protection, and can rely on men's government forced handouts in the form of welfare, they'll never settle for a guy that's equal.
Excellent breakdown. I'll add the fact that feminism drives down wages because of obvious principles of supply and demand in the labour market. Homes then become less affordable on the one hand, more suited towards double income households, while on the other hand people feel greater pressure to move to cities for the higher paying jobs, where they'll rent even less affordable property and decline to have children for a growing host of reasons that go hand in hand with urban hellholes.
Surely even some zoomettes are picking up on the fact that their forebears were retards for turning their great granddaughters into urban wageslaves.