Well, you really only have two options: support America First Republicans and try to reform the GOP or vote (or don't vote at all which is the same) for Democrats who are worse in every aspect than even the RINOs.
This is the correct response. We are up against the demographics timebomb. They want you to work within the system because it is reliably reducing the white percentage of the West by 5% every ten years regardless of how you vote.
Disagree, when voting between those two, the one who is not currently in office is better.
And in this case, it is coming up because Cornyn faces a primary runoff because he couldn't even get near 50% in the main primary. He is vulnerable.
Too many of the voters believe Fox News when they talk about Paxton not being electable. (Often coinciding with the portion of the population heavily exposed to tetraethyl lead throughout their childhood)
Or start actually getting involved in the political process and primary any Republican supporting this.
I get that the system seems to be fixed to lock people out, but why is this always only said by people who think voting constitutes the maximum level of participation in democracy?
The Leftists understand this far better than most of the people on this site do. You don't change things by just pushing a button every four years, you change it by going to every meeting, delegating, making a stink about every stupid thing they do, fundraise for radical candidates, use elections as opportunites to push your message, etc.
Well, you really only have two options: support America First Republicans and try to reform the GOP or vote (or don't vote at all which is the same) for Democrats who are worse in every aspect than even the RINOs.
Since there are no such thing as America only Republicans, the answer is zero seats.
I choose option 3. Accelerate
This is the correct response. We are up against the demographics timebomb. They want you to work within the system because it is reliably reducing the white percentage of the West by 5% every ten years regardless of how you vote.
Acceleration worked for South Africa and the people finally woke up
Disagree, when voting between those two, the one who is not currently in office is better.
And in this case, it is coming up because Cornyn faces a primary runoff because he couldn't even get near 50% in the main primary. He is vulnerable.
Too many of the voters believe Fox News when they talk about Paxton not being electable. (Often coinciding with the portion of the population heavily exposed to tetraethyl lead throughout their childhood)
Or start actually getting involved in the political process and primary any Republican supporting this.
I get that the system seems to be fixed to lock people out, but why is this always only said by people who think voting constitutes the maximum level of participation in democracy?
The Leftists understand this far better than most of the people on this site do. You don't change things by just pushing a button every four years, you change it by going to every meeting, delegating, making a stink about every stupid thing they do, fundraise for radical candidates, use elections as opportunites to push your message, etc.