I mean, when the government of Lebanon wants Israel to occupy their territory and the objective of the war is for Israel to occupy that territory then of course that'll happen. Ukraine fought against the Russians because the Ukrainian governments whole objective was to kill as many White people as possible.
It just goes to show how numbers means NOTHING if you don't have the logistics in place to support it.
Reason why Russia has done so badly? They pushed too far without the logistics to either to a yoinking like the US did in Venezuela or to quickly support the troops ahead to set up a FOB. Despite my MANY criticisms of Ukrainian leadership, this gave them enough time to adapt that the war is now a stalemate and Ukrainian is the best in drone offence and defence.
It's the reason why the US is still the leading superpower. When you can plant a working Burger King ANYWHERE in the world in less than 24 hours, you have a keen understanding of logistics.
I mean the fact we're already stipulating that they control their government, combined with things like their pager attack hints at extremely good logistics and infiltration.
The fact that we see them brute forcing now like a rabid dog doesn't detract from that..
They all got ahead in the 50s, 60s, 70s and 80s because the whole world had fucking lead poisoning and the global reduction in IQ meant that brainwashing was particularly effective.
Logistics, and a willingness to accept collateral damage, and the knowledge that negative popular sentiment blowback will be weak and ineffective. To take your Venezuela example, if the US was Israel, they probably would have just blown up his car or hit him with a drone strike.
Anyone can assassinate a leader, but dragging him out of his own capital with his wife, ZERO US losses and bringing them back to the US to try him in your courts, left a lot of people speechless for a week.
Russia is an embarrassing failure because they didn't quickly overrun the combined logistics, intelligence, funding, and weaponry of the entire fucking West lol
Russia entered the war with 90,000 men. They didn't have the numbers.
They expected Ukraine to realize that they mean business and make a deal. But o course, they were encouraged to fight until the last man, so they didn't.
As for logistics, the US is running out of interceptors and munition against a fifth-rate power like Iran. Logistics don't mean squat when you don't have the manufacturing capacity.
Non sense. If occupying means drawing lines and colors in a map and bombing civilians there then yes, if you don't count all the territories Russia already anexed and their bombs through all Ukraine.
I had to make my kids look at a large map last week because of all the zoomed in maps I've been seeing. This topic makes much more sense if you look at a map of the larger geographical region.
It's two distinct issues. Why is it being talked about as one? And, the level of geography had to get pretty low to pull that off.
difference is, jewtin is in league with jews and the whole war in Jewkraine was to get White people killed
if he wanted to take Jewkraine he could've done so in a week
meanwhile israel is determined to take arab lands for themselves and the zio-bought Leb govt is fully backing their efforts against Hazballah
its almost as they're playing warfare on easy mode considering all their opposition is sand people without the backing of world powers while they are backed by the biggest world powers on the planet
I mean, when the government of Lebanon wants Israel to occupy their territory and the objective of the war is for Israel to occupy that territory then of course that'll happen. Ukraine fought against the Russians because the Ukrainian governments whole objective was to kill as many White people as possible.
And replace them with jeets and africans.
It just goes to show how numbers means NOTHING if you don't have the logistics in place to support it.
Reason why Russia has done so badly? They pushed too far without the logistics to either to a yoinking like the US did in Venezuela or to quickly support the troops ahead to set up a FOB. Despite my MANY criticisms of Ukrainian leadership, this gave them enough time to adapt that the war is now a stalemate and Ukrainian is the best in drone offence and defence.
It's the reason why the US is still the leading superpower. When you can plant a working Burger King ANYWHERE in the world in less than 24 hours, you have a keen understanding of logistics.
It helps when mossad owns the government of Lebanon.
I have A LOT of criticisms of Israel but can't knock their planning and logistics.
Like the pager bombs alone was inspired.
Haven't they lost like 200 tanks? They're just carpet bombing everything with stolen bombs from the US and occupying the rubble.
It's brute force at the expense of their satrap state (us). Not some super genius plan.
I mean the fact we're already stipulating that they control their government, combined with things like their pager attack hints at extremely good logistics and infiltration.
The fact that we see them brute forcing now like a rabid dog doesn't detract from that..
They all got ahead in the 50s, 60s, 70s and 80s because the whole world had fucking lead poisoning and the global reduction in IQ meant that brainwashing was particularly effective.
So was the booby trapped children's toys, and the explosives in the twin towers in NYC. Jews invented terrorism.
Logistics, and a willingness to accept collateral damage, and the knowledge that negative popular sentiment blowback will be weak and ineffective. To take your Venezuela example, if the US was Israel, they probably would have just blown up his car or hit him with a drone strike.
Which to be honest was the weaker approach.
Anyone can assassinate a leader, but dragging him out of his own capital with his wife, ZERO US losses and bringing them back to the US to try him in your courts, left a lot of people speechless for a week.
Russia has done pretty good considering they're fighting the entirety of NATO. They were supposed to collapse in a month.
Lebanon has a traitor government that is already selling out.
Russia is an embarrassing failure because they didn't quickly overrun the combined logistics, intelligence, funding, and weaponry of the entire fucking West lol
Russia entered the war with 90,000 men. They didn't have the numbers.
They expected Ukraine to realize that they mean business and make a deal. But o course, they were encouraged to fight until the last man, so they didn't.
As for logistics, the US is running out of interceptors and munition against a fifth-rate power like Iran. Logistics don't mean squat when you don't have the manufacturing capacity.
I heard the Russian military has a problem with corruption as well.
Non sense. If occupying means drawing lines and colors in a map and bombing civilians there then yes, if you don't count all the territories Russia already anexed and their bombs through all Ukraine.
Take notes, neighbours. You can occupy large parts of Israel to thwart direct threats to whatever contact zone relevant to your country.
I had to make my kids look at a large map last week because of all the zoomed in maps I've been seeing. This topic makes much more sense if you look at a map of the larger geographical region.
It's two distinct issues. Why is it being talked about as one? And, the level of geography had to get pretty low to pull that off.
difference is, jewtin is in league with jews and the whole war in Jewkraine was to get White people killed
if he wanted to take Jewkraine he could've done so in a week
meanwhile israel is determined to take arab lands for themselves and the zio-bought Leb govt is fully backing their efforts against Hazballah
its almost as they're playing warfare on easy mode considering all their opposition is sand people without the backing of world powers while they are backed by the biggest world powers on the planet