Why is India like that
(youtu.be)
Comments (19)
sorted by:
This is jeet apologia. None of the examples given do anything to help survive under foreign occupation. Exacerbating the cobra problem by scamming the British bounty program meant to solve it doesn't harm the British. It just means more jeets get killed by cobras. There's no higher purpose to their rat like behavior. They're just inherently dishonest.
Funny thing about that snake bounty, the same thing happened in Florida and because of how many were claiming bounties, they cancelled it thinking they were cheating the same way.
The reason I don't think they were cheating is because it was rednecks doing it, they LOVE hunting so much I can believe they were the grim reapers of snakes lol.
I recall a weather event in Florida a few years back (drought? flood? storm? I forget which) drove a TON of snakes out of hiding. A LOT of them were invader species, more that estimated by quite a bit :/
So yes, I agree that rednecks are just happy to hunt them & very good at it too.
Meanwhile, New England and the West Coast are overrun with deer thanks to their onerous gun laws.
I think instead of struggling against foreign occupation it might be the fact they were subjects/slaves and had no stakes in the land and the properties, same thing with Chinese peasants. People don't have prides in keeping the area clean if they don't have any sense of ownership in the form of private property or prosperity, who cares if the streets and lands are dirty if it all belongs to the king/landlords/government who took 90% of your rice as rent and taxes and treated you like dirt and can take away what little you have for whatever reason.
As for the cobra bounty, jeets always gave me the feeling of being "clever" at scamming for petty profits (especially when quickly darting their eyes trying to think up words to scam you, not realizing you can tell they're obviously trying to pull a fast one) but aren't actually smart or wise for long term prosperity for the whole group. They thought they were clever and scammed the brits, not realizing or just not cared the effects when scams are busted because it's not them suffering the consequences
Insurance fraud remains a widespread issue in the U.S., costing businesses, insurers and consumers billions each year.
https://www.forbes.com/advisor/insurance/fraud-statistics/
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2026/04/03/southern-california-medicare-fraud-health-care-arrests/89443054007/
So are plenty of people in the upper parts of our society.
It literally does you fucking moron. Their scamming is their method of getting resources because they lack both mental and physical faculties to establish a better lot in life.
TLDW even though 4 minute video: India is the way it is currently as it only works culturally when colonised by a greater power.
I'd say that is true for a lot of the world, the biggest mistake of colonisation was not continuing competent European oversight. Under the Europeans they got improved logistics with roads, trains and better ports, a lot of that still runs UNIMPROVED despite being more than half a century old.
I remember watching a YouTube video, was talking about a plan purposed in 19th century Britain to turn the Empire into a federation, so each colony under it would have more cultural autonomy but remain under the control of Britain with Ireland being one of the first selected to do this in. It probably would've avoided the issue now after decolonisation and the flip side of full repression as that's how Vietnam became such an issue.
Uplifting never, ever works.
singers, hong kong.
I have similar thoughts about the Civil War. Chattel slavery was well on its way out and likely would have resolved itself in a decade or two anyways, and without all the devastating consequences of a Union victory. The "ackshully 50% of whites owned slaves" revisionism was individual professional households hosting them to learn skills like a naturally reoccurring medieval master-apprentice system, as it was quickly becoming impractical to have so many slaves working the fields. The households had significantly fewer rights over the slaves, and sometimes didn't even have the ability to refuse taking them in. The slaves were either owned by the landlords or the banks (shocker), who were in their own internal crisis over the fading relevancy of slavery. This is the history they were teaching in Florida that libs were having meltdowns over a few years ago.
That list leaves out the "stable currency" eh?
Hot, tropical climate = no need to evolve.
Trash genes reproduce and we get jeets. Who also happen to be mixed with abbos.
Correct. No need to plan for winter = a lazy people.
Even though India has a drought season & monsoon season? There's little that can be done about it, so they don't. Unlike winter where if you DON'T plan for it? You die.
Hmm maybe that explains why the Nepalese next door are at least more civilised since they had the adversity of mountainous conditions to live by.
They sided with the British quick (after a fight first) and managed to make it a working relationship. Seems you need SOME adversity whether mountainous conditions like in Peru to seasons to get the brain going.
Because they're subhumans, and when left to their own devices and absent an external force, groups will always regress to the mean.
They eat human poop.
They drink urine and menstrual blood.
They abuse mummies.
Pajeets are subhuman, but I am not talking about them
God damn i FUCKING HATE PAJEETS
Good vid