The more I've learned about our government, the more I've become a monarchist. Not that it's really that good, but overthrowing a single shithead is simpler than toppling a corrupt behemoth that's gives the people the illusion of choice, but is really just beholden to a certain group in people.
Think of it in terms of responsibility; a monarchy puts one man in charge and he's responsible for the country. If he lives and dies by the state of the State, he will (mostly) do what's best for it.
Who's responsible in a democracy? Everyone, which is to say no one.
I think democracy can work if leaders are properly held to account (ie are at personal risk if the state begins to fail) and if the voting franchise is properly earned.
"Most people shouldn't have a say in anything beyond their own nose" is already true. Voting is just an illusion of choice. All the important decisions are made by the Epstein class without input from anyone else.
That's true, but it seems that a monarchy is the only thing that can reign in a corrupt populace and a republic or a revolution is the only thing that can reign in a corrupt monarch. Therefore, a political system cannot be fixed indefinitely.
The more I've learned about our government, the more I've become a monarchist
a Christian monarchist who is trained from birth to answer to God. At the end of their life they will be judged. That is unironically the best form of government. That is what the two world ward destroyed and installed a bureaucracy in every country instead. The bureaucracy who is easily swayed by bribery against their own citizenry.
The more I've learned about our government, the more I've become a monarchist. Not that it's really that good, but overthrowing a single shithead is simpler than toppling a corrupt behemoth that's gives the people the illusion of choice, but is really just beholden to a certain group in people.
Think of it in terms of responsibility; a monarchy puts one man in charge and he's responsible for the country. If he lives and dies by the state of the State, he will (mostly) do what's best for it.
Who's responsible in a democracy? Everyone, which is to say no one.
I think democracy can work if leaders are properly held to account (ie are at personal risk if the state begins to fail) and if the voting franchise is properly earned.
Democracy only works if it's kept as small as possible. You should only be voting for what happens in your town and that's it
Indeed.
"Most people shouldn't have a say in anything beyond their own nose" is already true. Voting is just an illusion of choice. All the important decisions are made by the Epstein class without input from anyone else.
The problem with a monarchy is the perfect converse of that: the machinery of the state only has to corrupt one man to gain absolute control.
Corrupting hundreds hasn't seemed to have been much of a problem.
Because society itself has become corrupted. The people who wrote the Constitution pointed out that it could not handle an amoral populace.
That's true, but it seems that a monarchy is the only thing that can reign in a corrupt populace and a republic or a revolution is the only thing that can reign in a corrupt monarch. Therefore, a political system cannot be fixed indefinitely.
That's the result of the oligarchs and their puppets having nothing to fear from the people nowadays. What are you gonna do, vote harder?
a Christian monarchist who is trained from birth to answer to God. At the end of their life they will be judged. That is unironically the best form of government. That is what the two world ward destroyed and installed a bureaucracy in every country instead. The bureaucracy who is easily swayed by bribery against their own citizenry.