Private property ownership erased by B.C. decision on native land claim
(farmersforum.com)
Comments (19)
sorted by:
Well if you can't own property then there is basically no reason to work and invest into it because you can be kicked out at any time. If the only thing you can reasonably do is rent there isn't really a reason to live in Canada over anywhere else.
The only way the housing market in Canada can realistically survive this is if the majority of the population is either too dumb to realize what just happened, or if that law only gets applied to whites since they won't fight back.
This is BC S mainland, the wokest of the woke. Not only judicial but executive government had a doing in this. They reap what they sow.
It's worth pointing out as well that this issue is specific to BC as all other provinces have land treaties in place while large parts of BC were never actually ceded to the government, hence the court victories.
One wonders, however, what jurisdiction the court has if it's not based on Canadian land.
Edit: Here's the result of a five minute search.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Status_of_First_Nations_treaties_in_British_Columbia
The only land in BC that actually belongs to the government of Canada is Vancouver Island and a chunk in the far north east that's part of treaty 8. It was the BC government themselves that decided to not pursue treaties, which are explicitely required to obtain Canadian land under federal law, until the 1990s.
So no, contrary to the article, this ruling changes nothing for the rest of Canada; BC is just at the "find out" part of electing actual retards for over a hundred years.
No one is illegal in stolen land, until they are.
The funniest part, or the most stupid, of this case is that there are multiple tribes claiming ownership of the land but, because they're backwards savages with no concept of land ownership, the court is basically having them tell stories from "knowledge keepers" to see who owns what, since none of them come remotely close to proving it.
Basically, the fact that the land is not owned by Canada is a foregone conclusion that the BC government tried to ignore since their inception (no doubt all tax ever paid on this land will be refunded...) and the main fight is the Amerindian equivalent of trailer trash fighting over the dog on judge Judy.
And whoever wins will no doubt kick the other tribes off or make them pay some kind of tax to stay.
Should be fun to watch.
I am loaded on popcorn, never liked BC, ver nice to vacation but I would live there due to the government.
And it's ironic that you have those tribes claiming different things now and you don't link these to the land acknowledgments and the genocidal history of these tribes against others. We know the ones that survived, not the ones that perished.
I have a bit of a funny story about that.
I'm in Ontario and we do the stupid land acknowledgments as well. When we do, we specifically name the "Haudenashawnee" as the "traditional" owners.
Problem is, "Haudenashawnee" (ie Iroquois) aren't the traditional owners. All of southern Ontario was occupied by the Huron (Ashinabec) when Europeans arrived. The Iroquois went to war with them over beaver hunting (literally the Beaver Wars; they went as far south as Kansas, iirc) and drove them off the land. The Iroquois then hunted the beaver to near extinction, then left. Then another group, the Mississaugas, just walked in to the vacant space from where they were living (north of Lake Superior).
80 years later, the Americans revolted against the British. The Iroquois fought with the British but lost their land when the treaty was signed, so the British government bought all of southern Ontario from the Mississaugas and gave the Iroquois, under Joseph Brant, a nice chunk of it for them to settle.
So, today, the Ashinabec are fighting against the Haudenashawnee in the schools over who gets to get acknowledged.
In reality, nobody "owned" the land before Europeans arrived because absolutely no one here was advanced enough to have a formal concept of property ownership, much less land ownership.
And we created an alphabet for these people.
Two other tribes were claiming the land was theirs and were defendants on the case. The judge took evidence from tribal storytellers as evidence. Geez the Canadian government is something else
Ooh, the self own. Those are rare.
No government land? No government tax.
No doubt. If I owned land here I'd be organizing a class action lawsuit against all levels of government to recover all taxes ever paid.
Well if there's no such thing as owning property in Canada, they won't mind if we take it then. ;)
The article is incorrect; this only applies to most of BC, all other land in Canada is properly accounted for by treaties.
However, in that specific area, I think you're technically correct; anyone could walk in and help themselves without giving Canada a legitimate excuse to intervene.
haahahahahhahaha
You teach your kids to hate your culture and history and get made homeless ?
I only pray it happens soon so it affects those who pushed this hatred
This could be the first domino in the dissolution of Canada as a geopolitical entity. Once you freely, officially admit that the government has no claim over its dominion, where do you go from there?
First step toward techno-communism complete, abolish private property rights
Canada is so desperate to have white guilt they did this. Remember the native kids killed and buried at churches hoax? That didnt stick, but this white guilt / original sin schtick might work.
Okay, so no more taxes. Cool.
Canada has been self restricting for a while now.