There's no benefit to a free society in enabling the worst traits of parents. It doesn't produce good future citizens, it doesn't improve society, it doesn't save money...
Comments (16)
sorted by:
You remain retarded and lacking friends or any irl social circle hence spending all your time here, owhich is itself only by the grace of Dom being completely AFK right now.
It's not controversial to say that parents are responsible for their own kids. Fuck off, natalist cancer.
There's no value in pursuing your retarded ideology.
Why have you only recently started complaining about "pro natalism" policies? Is it because they are being proposed for White people for once? You have been mysteriously silent on the trillions we have thrown at niggers and spics to encourage them to outbreed Whites for the last several decades.
It's almost like you are a subversive jew behaving like every other subversive jew.
Because the current government promised to cut spending and instead raised it while increasing taxes and cutting safety nets for the childless. It's a complete betrayal of what people voted for.
Ding ding ding!
This is your argument.
Faggot.
It is Imp, 100%. You can't fake that particular brand of retardation.
Challenge accep-
CHALLENGE FAILED
Lol, of course you're a communist. Makes sense.
How is it communist to oppose handouts?
Were you only speaking of handouts? Because then you're right but it sounded like you opposed parents being able to parent how they wish to parent.
My post was about the fact that society has to bend over backwards to accommodate parents, who have pushed all responsibility for their reproduction onto the state and all burden onto the taxpayer.
Yeah, this is terrible. I think you worded your post pretty poorly to convey this though.
Society shouldn't treat parents or non-parents any differently, especially with regard to taxes and social programs.
Bachelor taxes are terrible and social programs that are funded by taxpayers that only benefit parents or children are also terrible (as are all social programs).
However, "pro-family" policies that prevent the government from parenting for parents and gives more freedom to parents outside of the government's prying eye or care are a good thing, regardless of how poorly the parents decide to parent.
Your initial post sounds like you're against parental rights because you want a centralized government that knows better than parents to parent for the parents (which is straight out of the communist playbook).