Just seeing some of the reaction to the Piers Morgan interview, Conor Tomlinson who I like seems to have fallen for it, along with other British right wingers. I watch pretty much everything Tucker does and I'm baffled by it. He spends almost no time talking about Islam, talks about Christianity constantly, talks about replacement etc. Somehow an interview he does with Piers calling out white replacement resulted in people thinking he's soft on Islam??
He always points out that it's white leftists who attack him in public and correctly stated that the zios are pushing the Muslim stuff heavily right now. He once said that submission to God doesn't sound bad when he found out that's what Sharia means and he criticizes Israel. The guy does like 10 hours of content a week and that's all they have on him. Apparently all the pro western/white/Christian work he's done doesn't matter and he's a secret Muslim or whatever. The zios have done a number on the right, people are waking up but holy shit some people are retarded.
The whole point of MIGA is to subvert white peoples and nations, and that mission is not helped by correctly pointing out that most of the anti-zionist right wing is explicitly pro-white. It is much more effective to falsely claim that anti-Zionist right wingers are crypto Muslim shills because this rallies the anti-muslims to MIGA’s side, muddying the waters and triggering internal strife. As per usual, the “third way” - raw white identity politics - is simply not permitted to exist. If you say “fuck Islam and Judaism both, we are Christian”, then Zionists will switch to calling you neo nazi.
Yes they will. But these people honestly consider Semites to be “White” too.
There are people who need excuses to not like people, and "paid Quatar shill" is one people have latched onto. Its retarded and obviously astroturfed, but we all know motivated reason allows people to hold beliefs that do not hold up to the slightest examination.
What’s that quote? To know who rules over you, ask who you’re not allowed to criticize.
I think I'm just surprised how effective it's been with some right wingers when its so transparent
They know it's transparent and that it's bullshit. It's a proxy war for the real fight. They can't come right out and say that they hate Tucker because he wants to put America before Israel, so they will throw any other attack they can at him.
Nobody on either side actually believes the official narrative.
You’re country’s right wing is the equivalent of America’s pre-Trump.
I'm Canadian actually but I pay more attention to the US and Britain these days cause we're fucked. Traditionally I agree with you, but the British right has been getting hardcore lately, they dont have free speech, different culture and conditions, but from what I see they are moving right too. I think part of the problem with this is the muslim issue is bigger and more present there, and the Israel issue isnt as in your face. Plus they aren't as aware of the dynamics in the US as much so don't know about the division on the right, the campaign against Tucker etc. But that was just an example, I've seen some American right wingers falling for it a bit too, I have a harder time understanding that.
Well, there's your problem right there.
Tomlinson was bragging not that long ago that he accepted the subsidized Israeli tour, not because he's a sellout, but because he was "curious".
He's doing the Sargon position of calling out zionists by saying they want what Israel has in England, which is a solid move because it exposes the hypocrisy without getting arrested. The brits have to be very careful with their words, but he and the lotus eaters lads seem to be squarely on the new right/Tucker/America first etc side of the debate on recent coverage, they've been critical of Shapiro and other MIGAs, been charitable to Tucker, Nick etc. Even on that Israel trip iirc he asked a tough question about this which made me happy, he wrote a good piece on it at the time too. He's solid imo and more based than he lets on, I'm just surprised he hasn't sniffed this out
Except Stellios. Still fully blue pilled on that topic.
The Big Lie
Lie big and lie often, people will assume it's true, because why would anyone lie about something so outrageous? It must be true. Refuge in audacity.
I think it's a manifestation of a phenomenon that I've noticed since the start of GamerGate.
We have a whole bunch of people who are smeared by the media, who are able to see that people are lying about them, and are pissed off about it. They think they're good people, but they're still annoyed. They congregate in a place like KiA to complain about the state of the world, while those in authority continue to smear everybody in this relatively obscure, small forum as being Nazis.
Some of the people in the forum still desperately want to be seen as good people. So when someone else in the forum says something that is outside of whatever Overton window they deem acceptable, they're able to point at that person and say (or just think) "Oh hey, there is one of the real bigots that everybody is upset about. I'm not like them; I'm better than them. I'm still one of the good guys."
So it gives them some level of cope; despite being in a group that's despised by the mainstream "acceptable" society, they can psychologically separate themselves from the worst accusations and even attempt to purge those people (KiA -> KiA2).
I personally feel somewhat immune to it though, because The Left has always convinced me that I'm the worst person for being born a white male, so I'm happy to live up to their delusion at this point.
British right-wingers are American moderates by any measure. It is not surprising that they are also considered neocons.