CBC, here we go ...
(media.scored.co)
Comments (26)
sorted by:
I’m sure the CBC will examine different perspectives here
All nuanced and explained and detailed and balanced.
Of course! The CBC reports everything good about the Liberals (even if they have to make it up!) and everything bad about the Conservatives (ditto, in fact fiction is obligatory).
Now that almost all the Media in Canada get free government money? They all obey the Liberal party's instructions.
“Do we kill them all, or do we kill just some of them and force the others into reeducation gulags where we forcibly medicate them and drug them until they parrot only what we tell them to say?”
CBC and other outlets just think everything is nazism
Damnit, CBC, stop trying to get me to defend Nick Fuentes.
Everyone seems to be trying to get me to like him, recently. His enemies are absolutely insufferable, and they always lie about him, too. When there are actually nasty things he said...but they still have to smear and take out of context.
It's Trump all over again. "Trump said Mexicans are rapists!"
I think Fuentes is a toxic brand, and I'd rather not be associated with him, but I don't really seem to have a choice anymore, for better or worse, and I'm not going to pearl clutch. I like some of his message, and it being "mainstreamed" is a good thing. Whether they use Nick to try to destroy "his" own message (it's not his message, he didn't invent it) down the line...I guess we'll take that as it comes.
And if it were either/or, I'm on Team Nick over Team Them.
I wonder if they know that they are helping him. Surely, after 10 years of Trump, they realize that unfair attacks only help people - particularly people who have something to hide, as they can dismiss any criticism by pointing to all the lies posted about them.
Is the ruling class really this dumb? If I were them, I'd attack people I wanted to elevate as bad for the other side strategically in this manner.
Fuentes supports war in Venezuela. The upswing in his public profile coincides with the push for that. Once whatever happens happens there, I expect they will deport him back to the fringes.
lol, how bizarre. There's really a whack a mole of different attempted wars. One guy opposes Ukraine, but supports Gaza, the other supports Gaza but supports Iran, the other opposes all and then supports attacking Venezuela.
Even some people here have snookered into supporting the Venezuela op.
Some people have a childish view of politics, as if these wars are discrete events. It's all one thing orchestrated by one entity. Fuentes is smart enough to know better which makes it even more suspect.
I fear that's 99% of people, who think that they're being sophisticated by judging each war on its merits. Which opens them up to manipulation with things like "this is in Murica's interest, they are bringing FENTANYL!" But in my lifetime, all wars have ended up stupid wars, including the ones I supported like Libya and Gaza. You'd have been more right being a defensive pacifist.
Also, when you're spending $1000 billion a year on the military, I think to many normies it feels like a waste of money to not use it.
You supported Obama's war on Libya? No surprise there.
Most Americans hate both political parties. That's why the consistent trend isn't left/right but rather anti-incumbent. The problem is that it's difficult to build an alternative to them. They will send feds and all kinds of shit after people for doing that.
It's Gamergate all over again.
Anyone telling me that I have to pick a side will see me siding against them.
I lost some early support for him when I found out he didn’t say that.
The left should be celebrating Nick Fuentes. Thanks to him, white people are finally buying into the identity politics they have been pushing so hard. So when I see a headline like this, I just mentally add "and that's a good thing" and then celebrate because all the right people are angry over it.
You mean the untermensch that the NSDAP disavowed and imprisoned? The people who stand for the exact opposite of what the national socialists supported?
I’m glad the ZOG media still uses this buzzword. It shows instantly that whomever is using it is not worth anyone’s time or attention. Easier for me to parse the data.
I wonder if they will voice any legitimate grievances, before giving a well researched counterargument and alternative solution.
Lol
Wonder if the article makes any links to Diagolon & Jeremy MacKenzie. Who hates Fuentes btw & frequently countersignals him.
Though modern day Jeremy MacKenzie is more of a foul-mouthed, angry sperg Thomas Rousseau than he is a Canuck catboi fuhrer.