Now it's "almost certainly Israel, and it's going to take a lot of exonerating evidence to convince me otherwise."
You literally don't even have any direct evidence of Israeli involvement. There's no evidence that's going to convince you of Israel not being involved, because you weren't convinced into this with evidence.
Even these texts are not direct evidence of an Israeli assassination. It's not even indirect evidence of one.
Notice Gizortnik moved the goalposts. First it was "the texts were probably fake", and now that it turns out they're real he pretends his complaint was "well it doesn't PROVE that the guy who was afraid someone was going to kill him right before he was killed was killed by the group he said he was afraid was going to kill him".
And here we have the left doing the usual of pretending to not understand simple things. One would think he would look at his downvotes and accept that it doesn't work, but jews are a very stubborn people.
You literally don't even have any direct evidence of Israeli involvement
No shit, Sherlock. All I have is an official story that's pretty clearly bullshit with a whole bunch of gaps that do not need to be gaps if they'd just tell the truth.
I've seen nothing to indicate lies from the police on this. And again, you're re-stating my point: you didn't arrive to your conclusion by evidence. You're not going to be dissuaded out of it by evidence either.
How about the rifle owned by his grandfather with an empty casing in the chamber?
You literally have a smoking gun and a confession, and this evidence has been soundly dismissed, but the lack of evidence showing Israeli involvement is wildly conclusive...
You literally don't even have any direct evidence of Israeli involvement. There's no evidence that's going to convince you of Israel not being involved, because you weren't convinced into this with evidence.
Even these texts are not direct evidence of an Israeli assassination. It's not even indirect evidence of one.
We already don’t believe you, Bibi. You don’t have to keep convincing us.
Notice Gizortnik moved the goalposts. First it was "the texts were probably fake", and now that it turns out they're real he pretends his complaint was "well it doesn't PROVE that the guy who was afraid someone was going to kill him right before he was killed was killed by the group he said he was afraid was going to kill him".
Next on the menu, “Here’s why it’s a good thing the texts are real…”
"I thought people on this thread were interested in truth"
Where exactly did I say that the texts were fake?
Why would the PM of Israel talk to you?
Ouch, low IQ moment right here.
So we're now moving from "Giz is a jew" to "Giz is literally Benjamin Netanyahu" in levels of retardation?
And here we have the left doing the usual of pretending to not understand simple things. One would think he would look at his downvotes and accept that it doesn't work, but jews are a very stubborn people.
I don't have to be popular to be right. I don't accept morality or truth via consensus.
What are you, a woman?
No shit, Sherlock. All I have is an official story that's pretty clearly bullshit with a whole bunch of gaps that do not need to be gaps if they'd just tell the truth.
So why would they lie?
God you're so tiresome.
"whole bunch of gaps", yeah... like the shooter.
I've seen nothing to indicate lies from the police on this. And again, you're re-stating my point: you didn't arrive to your conclusion by evidence. You're not going to be dissuaded out of it by evidence either.
The "text messages" from "Tyler Robinson" are enough evidence of lying to anyone with a brain
The confession to his father was also a lie too?
How about the rifle owned by his grandfather with an empty casing in the chamber?
You literally have a smoking gun and a confession, and this evidence has been soundly dismissed, but the lack of evidence showing Israeli involvement is wildly conclusive...