Bluesky bans noncon, troons most affected
(archive.is)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (32)
sorted by:
Gonna be honest, I think the biggest consumers of CNC content are the actual women on these sites. Its the number one fetish among women by a long margin for a reason, and its pretty normal for the autism fest that is the troons.
Yeah, noncon is is downright vanilla compared to the shit those freaks are into.
''Noncon'' ( rape or ''ambiguous consent'' ) is a main feature of so many women's romance novels. They love the fantasy of being taken by a dominant attractive man.
For the vast majority of them, it's just a fantasy and they don't want to actually go through it.
It's not a new thing. Women's erotic novels featuring ''ravishing'' dates back 60+ years.
Most of them want to go through with it in a "noncon" setting. If the man is attractive enough, the main qualifier for them to trust him because women, they will basically let him get away with all sorts of roleplay brutality to the level that if the cops were called it would still get you charged with the crime regardless of her consent.
You don't even need the consent half the time, just be dominant enough and she will soak herself that you just did it to her. Not the rape part, but the rest of the roughness that comes along with it, obviously.
Its a common enough problem for the modern standup joke "I'm not going to rape you on the off chance you are into that" being less joke and more a real issue in the dating market.
Yes they do, but the fantasy includes a high value man who commits to them. Low value man = rape, and high value man who doesn’t commit will be reframed as rape.
Women use sex as a commodity. Much like basically everything else in life because they're all natural born psychopaths or sociopaths. Imo it's literally biology but people don't want to admit it. Every animal will abandon their young in a life or death scenario if it gives them a chance to live and reproduce again.
I believe animals that reproduce less like elephants and humans are wired to be less likely to abandon their young because of how hard it is to reproduce, but I believe the underlying instinct to abandon still exists in many. I've seen many women abandon children for any amount of reasons. I've seen them offer up their children as a a sacrifice so that they had a chance at living. I've seen women literally push children in front of them to shield themselves from a perceived threat. Women are some form of -path that only "cares" for things that provide them some form of value. Men aren't wired that way.
This is obviously all mostly backed by my own observations and I don't claim to be a scientific expert. Happy to be proven wrong by science and studies, because believing all this about women isn't exactly a happy stance lol
As a tall, dark and handsome man, the number of times I got asked to fulfill a woman's rape fantasies was a big part of why I gave up on casual sex.