I want to address some of the discussion about the lack of an exit wound with Charlie. I’m usually not interested in delving into most of this kind of online chatter, and I apologize this is somewhat graphic, but in this case, the fact that there wasn’t an exit wound is probably another miracle, and I want people to know.
I just spoke with the surgeon who worked on Charlie in the hospital…
He said the bullet “absolutely should have gone through, which is very very normal for a high powered, high velocity round. I’ve seen wounds from this caliber many times and they always just go through everything. This would have taken a moose or two down, an elk, etc.”
But it didn’t go through. Charlie’s body stopped it.
I mentioned to his doctor that there were dozens of staff, students, and special guests standing directly behind Charlie on the other side of the tent, and he replied:
“It was an absolute miracle that someone else didn’t get killed.”
“His bone was so healthy and the density was so so impressive that he’s like the man of steel. It should have just gone through and through. It likely would have killed those standing behind him too.”
In the end, the coroner did find the bullet just beneath the skin.
Even in death, Charlie managed to save the lives of those around him.
Remarkable. Miraculous.
So now we are down to shameless exploitations of "faith" and "miracles" like a round 2x bigger than a .556 failing to exit Charlie's neck because he is literally Superman.
Magic bullet 2.0. What are the chances?
This is the stupidest, most insulting coverup in history. I'm sorry, but you have to be an absolute moron to believe this. If that round hit Charlie's bone then his entire neck would have been blown into chunks.
I can personally attest that 30-06 will go through a 200+ lb feral boar at 200 yards, there's no chance in hell a human neck would trap a regular 30-06 bullet.
only explanations:
-the shooter was using a low power round, a possibility given he was a gay furry soy boy
-it was a frangible bullet, or the bullet otherwise broke up on impact. from the description, it sounds like they recovered the whole bullet, so this is probably not it.
Also, the blood coming out his neck and the way it is spewing it is more in line with an exit wound then with an entry wound. Which makes things even more confusing. It still could be the entry wound but it would be weird
Here's another argument: the surgeon doesn't know what he's talking about.
Surgeons typically don't know shit about guns or ammunition. They also rarely know anything about police encounters. I remember listening to one go on television to complain that the cops "didn't need to fire so many times" (dude had a gun and was shooting at cops).
I think that there's a possibility that the bullet may have broken-up, but that a fragment may have been lodged in his spine.
Surgeon definitely has no idea what he's talking about, claiming to have seen 30-06 wounds many times.
"Many 30-06 wounds"
also known as "fist sized holes"
Also, I just found out today that Kirk's wife and kids were never at the event. So, that's a bit of misinformation cleanup that needs to be documented.
https://xcancel.com/thevivafrei/status/1972028337649324092#m
It was not a direct hit. The bullet hit his vest, and ricocheted upward. That's why his shirt kicked up.
He didn't wear any vest. Unless it's a vest that's so thin that you can see his nipples through it.
He was shot from behind. The shock wave of the impact spreads from behind to the front. That's why his earpiece goes flying and the shirt moves first in the back before getting kicked up in the front.
Remember. The crime scene got sterilized within less than a week. You don't do that if you don't want to hide something.
Really don't understand why people don't want to ask questions.
Personally I am looking at the "shot from his right side, exit wound left" theory. There is a guy that looks like he's aiming a tiny gun at him just as he's shot.
From behind on his right. That's what I meant.
he jerked backwards when getting shot, so I don't think he was shot from behind.
https://x.com/OwenShroyer1776/status/1969509280978981255
His head jerks backwards because the bullet hit him from behind in the neck. The bullet exits in the front, punches through his shirt and blows the shirt up. In the video you can see the shockwave traveling from left to right.
The crime scene was sterilized shortly after he was murdered. Like I said. You don't do that if you don't want to hide something. Also we have no video of the patsy actually firing his rifle despite being in view of the security camera. Why?
The story that his spine simply ate and absorbed the power of a rifle bullet is completely unbelievable. If your bullet punches a hole of that size on entry there is absolutely no chance in hell that it won't be able to completely pulverize a few vertebra.
I'm not sure what game is being played here but there is one being played and simply believing the official story that has more holes than the Vegas shooting story is gonna come back to bite you in the ass.
Also someone else being the shooter won't obfuscate the fact that the mainstream left around the world celebrated and cherished his murder. They dropped their mask entirely and nothing can undo that.
If he was ONLY wearing the plate, meaning no Kevlar or porcelain around it, it literally might not be wide enough to cover his nipples.
Without porcelan and anti-spalling material around the plate, I would say it could make lethal injury from bullet spall much more likely.
Again he wasn't wearing any body armor. That much has been officially confirmed.
Who confirmed that? I was very sure he wasn't wearing any but I didn't know that was stated.
edit: just saw the NYP article where Erika Kirk confirmed that.
1 - that is not what official sources are stating. In this account "the bullet should have gone through and hit people behind him."
2 - Paramount Tactical, who is the most credible proponent of the body armor theory, said himself he believes there is a "90% chance that Charlie was not wearing body armor."
No, he didn't have a vest. That thing you see deforming his shirt is the cable for his mic and earpiece.
At 5:15 mins you will see the actual damage from a 30.06 round. No bull or explanation.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=y4fYx3j5YBQ
https://youtu.be/y6zPjo5Vogc
https://youtu.be/lqG61FEvnTY
According to the same source, "90% chance that Charlie was not wearing body armor."
Coverup of what? You think he's hanging out with Tupac on his mystery island somewhere?
Several possibilities, but they all boil down to some form of: not the shooter they said, not the gun they said, possibly not even the angle they said.
Who's they and why?
"They" is clearly the FBI, Kash Patel, and the governor of Utah.
As for the why: Why do you think JFK was killed?
Think about the user base of this site and then you’ll understand.
You fucking retard.
Nice try CIA
I figured 2 things immediately while watching.
Instant reaction from Charlie indicates spinal cord damage. But how is a ricochet that enters the side of his neck going to cut off his spinal cord?
It's not.
Agreed it seems odd.