They are saying that the groypers were at war with Charlie Kirk so they assassinated him. I don't really care for the groypers, but it seems like a desperate attempt to associate the shooter with the "far-right".
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (77)
sorted by:
Fuentes has repeatedly endorsed leftists. He cant be trusted
Eh, normies have been trusting much much worse people than Fuentes for the past decade. Let me list the name, Boogie2596, Destiny, hbomberguy, mr beast, sam bankman-fried, Hasan Piker, Anthony Fantano, troons breadtubers. Why I call them much worse? They probably endorsed grooming kids to LGBT, BLM, troon surgery and vaccine mandate. I think we need to point out specifically why certain influencer is bad.
I also hate all those fuckers and people kept defending them too. Especially that son of a bitch boogie
Well he was so called mr rogers of the internet and people so badly expected boogie to live up to that image. When he couldn't fulfil that role, people were trying to cope making excuses like "I'm sure Mr roger had a few vices and etc etc." As for me, I wasn't fan of Boogie due to his wishywashy weak beta personality. Then again I didn't like most of the western content creators that became active in 2010 especially the people associated with Channel awesome and 15 years later, I feel vindicated.
That's exactly why I had a problem with boogie. He was spineless and to me it appeared like he came out of nowhere with popularity. He was a fat liberal fuck with no convictions so I found his influence and popularity strange. I also did not watch YouTube almost at all until 2019 so I wasn't persuaded by the popularity of random homos. Most all of them appeared to me how everyone now views Darksyde Phil
Was he though? This feels a lot like those titles people repeat until its associated with a person but few actually believe.
Wil Wheaton and Felicia Day were not literal king and queen of all nerds, but their marketing team certainly said it enough to meme it into reality for a short while.
Sure, but it doesn't detract from his arguments.
As mentioned before, even NON Fuentes fans wanted him and Kirk to have a debate because Fuentes has a lot of irrefutably good points about the oppression of White males in Occidental nations. The idea was that even if you didn't like Kirk's politics or milquetoast corporate platitudes, one would be interested to know what his solutions would have been for the systematic problems Fuentes oftentimes brings up?
You don't have to like him to understand he still made good points that needed to be discussed on broader platforms.
See how easy that is?