They are saying that the groypers were at war with Charlie Kirk so they assassinated him. I don't really care for the groypers, but it seems like a desperate attempt to associate the shooter with the "far-right".
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (77)
sorted by:
A friend has done an interview and said he was the only leftist in a Republican family. There is no debate, they are just muddying the waters. Also as Walsh pointed out, no groyper is going to call Charlie a fucking fascist FFS, it's nonsensical. Fuentes and Charlie had beef, but this type of radicalism towards white conservatives is reserved for the left. If a groyper type went haywire he would target Jews or something like that, not con inc. And like I said, even in the small chance that happened, the bullets would say kike lover and shit like that, not fucking fascist ffs
Never send your kids to college, especially in the big cities.
The Little Fish - Big Pond dynamic ruins teenage girls, and the colleges don't help.
If this is truly the assassin, and not a patsy for a false flag (a huge assumption right now), and if what you said is true, it probably explains why this man radicalized and acted out. Singular leftists from entirely right wing families fall out hard, and easily go more extreme left than "normal" lefties. These lone lefties go absolutely rabid and are really easy to inculcate into left wing propaganda and violent rhetoric, fueled off of hatred for their own families.
The FBI didn't find him, he was turned in by his own family after he bragged to them. That would be one hell of a strange set up for a false flag patsy.
Yeah, there are some people who have gotten so lost in the sauce they see everything as a psyop instead of admitting sometimes a spade is a spade.
As I said, I leave the possibilities open. However, if you don't think families are ever involved or willing to be involved in conspiracies, you're not well versed on the subject. As a small example, just look at what happened with the Sandy Hook school shooting. Tons of families went along with the narrative because they were either feds, crisis actors, or got their mortgages paid off. The school wasn't even in working order when the shooting supposedly happened.
This is precisely the mistake right wingers, and normal people in general, continue to make. You're trusting known liars. You're trusting the government and media, that lie to us all the time. Stop making this mistake. It makes you really easy to manipulate.
That is a good point, but I don't understand why the timeline has clear inconsistencies with his clothes and the gun.
The gun is nowhere on his body when he walks to the site and the idea he could conceal it in his jeans, even broken down, seems absurd when you see clear pictures.
The answer is accomplices. Probably three or four. At least one of which is likely to be faculty at the college.
There's a lot of right wing influencers I don't like, but it makes absolutely zero sense to inflict violence on them.
Do you have that interview?