They are saying that the groypers were at war with Charlie Kirk so they assassinated him. I don't really care for the groypers, but it seems like a desperate attempt to associate the shooter with the "far-right".
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (77)
sorted by:
The FBI didn't find him, he was turned in by his own family after he bragged to them. That would be one hell of a strange set up for a false flag patsy.
Yeah, there are some people who have gotten so lost in the sauce they see everything as a psyop instead of admitting sometimes a spade is a spade.
As I said, I leave the possibilities open. However, if you don't think families are ever involved or willing to be involved in conspiracies, you're not well versed on the subject. As a small example, just look at what happened with the Sandy Hook school shooting. Tons of families went along with the narrative because they were either feds, crisis actors, or got their mortgages paid off. The school wasn't even in working order when the shooting supposedly happened.
This is precisely the mistake right wingers, and normal people in general, continue to make. You're trusting known liars. You're trusting the government and media, that lie to us all the time. Stop making this mistake. It makes you really easy to manipulate.
That is a good point, but I don't understand why the timeline has clear inconsistencies with his clothes and the gun.
The gun is nowhere on his body when he walks to the site and the idea he could conceal it in his jeans, even broken down, seems absurd when you see clear pictures.
The answer is accomplices. Probably three or four. At least one of which is likely to be faculty at the college.
I though that was obvious? I mean ffs that fucking Jew in the crowd was clearly in on it, trying to make everyone attack him and pay attention to him.