Abusing a coupon is in fact nigger behavior. The dude posted it because he’s now ending the coupon because it was abused and he would lose to much, it’s not like he doxxed the person. You blaming the business owner for someone gaming a coupon is the exact reason why we don’t have nice things in society anymore. If everything has to be locked down with legalize to be nigger and jeet proof then you’re demanding the shithole society simply because you want to exploit something.
Why the customer aware of how damaging what he did is? Because the seller makes it seem like he is in the cusp of losing everything based off this sale.
From what it looks like is seller got in stock that is pricier than anything he carried before, the coupon existed before the stock. It’s an oversight flaw but something any rational person would have noticed when getting a massive discount on a product with a low overhead.
If you’re too dumb to know thermal pricing then you’re too dumb to be using thermal in the first place. The seller is mad because he got fucked over by a customer, and now has to end the coupon use for everyone. This is a simple case of don’t abuse a good thing because it will end and never come back.
The seller presumably knows how much thermal costs, and he knows his own fucking coupon system so he’s the biggest retard for letting it happen in the first place.
Its most likely an automated system for whatever checkout system he’s using. Probably didn’t set the criteria well enough or couldnt due to limitations on the software
And you want a society filled with niggers and jeets as a result. “If you don’t make something bulletproof, it’s your fault” is the argument of a lazy stupid person. You might as well smear shit on yourself and start shitting in the streets, because that is 100% low trust society third world behavior.
I consider abuse of a business policy to be using it in a way that defeats its purpose. Such as returning boots after trashing them for years because they have a "lifetime warranty."
In this case the purpose of the coupon is simply to discount items and the customer is incapable of reading the owner's mind or making business decisions for him.
I consider abuse of a business policy to be using it in a way that defeats its purpose. Such as returning boots after trashing them for years because they have a "lifetime warranty."
In this case the purpose of the coupon is simply to discount items and the customer is incapable of reading the owner's mind or making business decisions for him.
Again, I get it, you want a low trust society. You don’t have to keep reiterating it. The purpose of the coupon was for items at a far lower value. New expensive stock comes in at a low overhead and customers shouldn’t be expected to think about things! They just consume, that’s their job right?! Consume everything as cheap as possible because that’s what a consumer does!
I would like to get some more info on how the coupon was enabled, quick understanding of the tiers makes me presume that it was a higher tier with most tier requiring multiple months before receiving the rewards, thus meaning that the cost must be further reducted from the coupon granted, if we take 3 months as the min on highest tier that would mean a reduction of 150 from the coupon meaning the cost was 350 (I don't like when people try to exaggerate their pains).
Furthermore you are telling me that using one coupon for an item is nigger behavior if the seller makes a mistake in their cost/ratio? I could potentially see it if you are setting it into systemic use, but if I see an item I want and i got a coupon why would it be my duty to ensure that the entire production chain is valid? That is a insane system of bureaucracy. I hope you know every step of purchase you do and their full production chain, I need to know every margin is correct?
Do explain how it is the customers fault in this regard.
Youre assuming the buyer knew it was a mistake. Seeing as he apparently was a Patreon supporter and donated hundreds to charity in response, it's fairly clear he wasn't trying to bilk the dude out of some money.
Youre assuming the buyer knew it was a mistake. Seeing as he apparently was a Patreon supporter and donated hundreds to charity in response, it's fairly clear he wasn't trying to bilk the dude out of some money.
Abusing a coupon is in fact nigger behavior. The dude posted it because he’s now ending the coupon because it was abused and he would lose to much, it’s not like he doxxed the person. You blaming the business owner for someone gaming a coupon is the exact reason why we don’t have nice things in society anymore. If everything has to be locked down with legalize to be nigger and jeet proof then you’re demanding the shithole society simply because you want to exploit something.
Why the customer aware of how damaging what he did is? Because the seller makes it seem like he is in the cusp of losing everything based off this sale.
No, and he actually apologized, and donated hundreds of dollars.
Which I don't think he needed to, but is a nice gesture, and he wanted to support the guy he bought from.
It's the seller's fault for how he set things up, but it all worked out for everyone.
Seller shouldn’t have public shamed the dude and messaged him directly
For sure. And then not bragged about 'bullying working,' when it was the seller's fault in the first place.
Right, but if anything, that proves that he didn’t know, and Ahaus is way off base here.
That's my point.
From what it looks like is seller got in stock that is pricier than anything he carried before, the coupon existed before the stock. It’s an oversight flaw but something any rational person would have noticed when getting a massive discount on a product with a low overhead.
If you’re too dumb to know thermal pricing then you’re too dumb to be using thermal in the first place. The seller is mad because he got fucked over by a customer, and now has to end the coupon use for everyone. This is a simple case of don’t abuse a good thing because it will end and never come back.
The seller presumably knows how much thermal costs, and he knows his own fucking coupon system so he’s the biggest retard for letting it happen in the first place.
Its most likely an automated system for whatever checkout system he’s using. Probably didn’t set the criteria well enough or couldnt due to limitations on the software
And you want a society filled with niggers and jeets as a result. “If you don’t make something bulletproof, it’s your fault” is the argument of a lazy stupid person. You might as well smear shit on yourself and start shitting in the streets, because that is 100% low trust society third world behavior.
I consider abuse of a business policy to be using it in a way that defeats its purpose. Such as returning boots after trashing them for years because they have a "lifetime warranty."
In this case the purpose of the coupon is simply to discount items and the customer is incapable of reading the owner's mind or making business decisions for him.
Again, I get it, you want a low trust society. You don’t have to keep reiterating it. The purpose of the coupon was for items at a far lower value. New expensive stock comes in at a low overhead and customers shouldn’t be expected to think about things! They just consume, that’s their job right?! Consume everything as cheap as possible because that’s what a consumer does!
I would like to get some more info on how the coupon was enabled, quick understanding of the tiers makes me presume that it was a higher tier with most tier requiring multiple months before receiving the rewards, thus meaning that the cost must be further reducted from the coupon granted, if we take 3 months as the min on highest tier that would mean a reduction of 150 from the coupon meaning the cost was 350 (I don't like when people try to exaggerate their pains).
Furthermore you are telling me that using one coupon for an item is nigger behavior if the seller makes a mistake in their cost/ratio? I could potentially see it if you are setting it into systemic use, but if I see an item I want and i got a coupon why would it be my duty to ensure that the entire production chain is valid? That is a insane system of bureaucracy. I hope you know every step of purchase you do and their full production chain, I need to know every margin is correct?
Do explain how it is the customers fault in this regard.
You're correct. You shouldn't have to have a lawyer go over every decision you make just to not get screwed by some rules lawyering faggot.
A high trust society means you don't take advantage of others mistakes.
Youre assuming the buyer knew it was a mistake. Seeing as he apparently was a Patreon supporter and donated hundreds to charity in response, it's fairly clear he wasn't trying to bilk the dude out of some money.
Youre assuming the buyer knew it was a mistake. Seeing as he apparently was a Patreon supporter and donated hundreds to charity in response, it's fairly clear he wasn't trying to bilk the dude out of some money.