From what it looks like is seller got in stock that is pricier than anything he carried before, the coupon existed before the stock. It’s an oversight flaw but something any rational person would have noticed when getting a massive discount on a product with a low overhead.
No, and he actually apologized, and donated hundreds of dollars.
Which I don't think he needed to, but is a nice gesture, and he wanted to support the guy he bought from.
It's the seller's fault for how he set things up, but it all worked out for everyone.
Seller shouldn’t have public shamed the dude and messaged him directly
For sure. And then not bragged about 'bullying working,' when it was the seller's fault in the first place.
Right, but if anything, that proves that he didn’t know, and Ahaus is way off base here.
That's my point.
From what it looks like is seller got in stock that is pricier than anything he carried before, the coupon existed before the stock. It’s an oversight flaw but something any rational person would have noticed when getting a massive discount on a product with a low overhead.