Grok has been reeducated
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
What evidence from a murder in 1913 could possibly exist? Even fingerprinting was barely in use at the time.
In the early 1900's, in Georgia, instead of an accused black man, with the KKK all over? Really JewBot9000?
100% kiked by the ADL. You had a good run, Grok.
Modern evidence: because jews in (insert current year) said so.
Check out the sources Wikipedia uses to claim that leo frank was innocent. They are all articles written by jews.
The founder of Wikipedia was interviewed awhile back and had stated that it had largely been taken over so that all links point towards left- leaning sites. (And probably heavily jewish).
Why are you trying to reason with a LLM? This is an engagement baiting post with no real value.
There is value you just don't get it. AI can be based when left alone. Like Tay AI for example. Tay AI basically became Nazi and then Microsoft shut it down. . If Grok is pro jewish or woke it is because it's been specifically programmed to be that way .
You don't need Grok to be on your side, you need whoever trains Grok to be on your side.
So probing Grok for answers you want is useless, unless you're simply trying to figure out what it's been instructed.
That would be the later-life confession of some factory worker that he saw Conley (the black janitor) moving Mary Phagan's body. Except everyone knew that happened already (Conley was moving the body at the direction of Leo Frank).
I know almost nothing about Leo Frank's actions, but I know that when it comes to Jack The Ripper, they've basically identified the man in question due to some original DNA samples. Even poorly preserved DNA samples can be useful (in this case because "jack" literally wasn't even English). The big benefit here is that the original detectives had the man as a prime suspect from the start, so it was easy to basically prove them right.
If any of the original material was preserved in some way, you could get DNA tests to isolate out people, and it's possible that additional documentational information (like alibi's) could have been discovered that wasn't available to the original investigators.
Like I said, I don't know if any of this applies in Leo Frank's case, but it is possible that our modern techniques could identify the culprit if good investigative work was done initially, and any amount of evidence was adequately preserved.