I'll still be here any time you all want to admit you were gaslit into panicking and freaking out over nothing. Again.
Again, it's not even over, but keep patting yourself on the back.
I don't think I ever sad war was guaranteed (and if I did, I massively misspoke), and I know I said it wasn't guaranteed multiple times.
But yeah, bombing a foreign country, and in the Middle east no less, for no reason, with bullshit propaganda as justification, is NOT GOOD.
I'm not apologizing for being wrong, because my arguments were sound, that this was needless and COULD spark larger conflict. I didn't say would, I said could.
There was no reason to bomb Iran. Well, not one in American interests at least.
Call me a "panican" (cute new term everyone's using) all you want, but I don't support bombing anyone without a REALLY good reason. And there wasn't one here.
Not backing down. As I said since the very beginning, I continue to hope this ends about where we are right now.
And I agree that there was no good reason for it. There was also no good reason for the entire "new right" anti-intelligentsia to immediately turn the World War III talk up to 11. For, as Razor points out, at least the third time. What exactly was the last thing Candace Owens or Nick Fuentes were right about?
Forgive me for being old, but I remember when Candace Owens was on the left wing and proposing/working on a doxxing website. Maybe I've judged her too harshly, but I don't trust her to be presenting genuine opinions, I think she's grifting off whatever gains her notoriety.
If she was a grifter, she wouldn't be taking so many stances that routinely get people canceled. And she wouldn't be going so hard in the paint either.
What happened is that she "noticed" what is happening in the world and she is pissed about it.
Candace was a kid who proposed/worked on an anti-bullying website that could have easily been used as a doxxing website.
Gee, I guess we should condemn someone for a not-fully-thought-through idea they had when they were a teenager. It's almost like nearly every tool could be used for nefarious purposes.
I don't generally even watch Candace, but for the love of God please let this fucking ancient bit of misinformation die. You're taking the side of Zoe ("You'll ruin everything!") on this one for fuck's sake.
Why are you hanging on every word of some indoors sunglasses-wearing douchebag who doesn't know the first thing he's talking about? We really are in idiocracy.
What exactly was the last thing Candace Owens or Nick Fuentes were right about?
I don't care for either homosexual virgins or Candace. What was the last thing David Frum and Bill Kristol were right about? The arguments you're making are just preposterous - they're not even arguments.
Again, it's not even over, but keep patting yourself on the back.
I don't think I ever sad war was guaranteed (and if I did, I massively misspoke), and I know I said it wasn't guaranteed multiple times.
But yeah, bombing a foreign country, and in the Middle east no less, for no reason, with bullshit propaganda as justification, is NOT GOOD.
I'm not apologizing for being wrong, because my arguments were sound, that this was needless and COULD spark larger conflict. I didn't say would, I said could.
There was no reason to bomb Iran. Well, not one in American interests at least.
Call me a "panican" (cute new term everyone's using) all you want, but I don't support bombing anyone without a REALLY good reason. And there wasn't one here.
Not backing down. As I said since the very beginning, I continue to hope this ends about where we are right now.
And I agree that there was no good reason for it. There was also no good reason for the entire "new right" anti-intelligentsia to immediately turn the World War III talk up to 11. For, as Razor points out, at least the third time. What exactly was the last thing Candace Owens or Nick Fuentes were right about?
A few said WW3. Most were saying another forever war in the sandbox. Which it looked like, and still could turn into.
I don't follow either super closely, and Fuentes not at all, but Candace is pretty sharp. She's on it on a lot of things.
Forgive me for being old, but I remember when Candace Owens was on the left wing and proposing/working on a doxxing website. Maybe I've judged her too harshly, but I don't trust her to be presenting genuine opinions, I think she's grifting off whatever gains her notoriety.
If she was a grifter, she wouldn't be taking so many stances that routinely get people canceled. And she wouldn't be going so hard in the paint either.
What happened is that she "noticed" what is happening in the world and she is pissed about it.
Candace was a kid who proposed/worked on an anti-bullying website that could have easily been used as a doxxing website.
Gee, I guess we should condemn someone for a not-fully-thought-through idea they had when they were a teenager. It's almost like nearly every tool could be used for nefarious purposes.
I don't generally even watch Candace, but for the love of God please let this fucking ancient bit of misinformation die. You're taking the side of Zoe ("You'll ruin everything!") on this one for fuck's sake.
What about the lack of sovereignty talk? It seems like RazorFist is taking advantage of some people going full WW3 to ignore the real problem.
Why are you hanging on every word of some indoors sunglasses-wearing douchebag who doesn't know the first thing he's talking about? We really are in idiocracy.
I don't care for either homosexual virgins or Candace. What was the last thing David Frum and Bill Kristol were right about? The arguments you're making are just preposterous - they're not even arguments.