Donating money to her clearly isn't a waste because of all the rats coming out of the woodwork to complain that people are fighting back against cancel culture. It's revealing how many supposedly right wing figures are liberal shills.
At this point Hendrix could be a mouth breathing OF prostitute and she would still have served a useful purpose to society.
I'm not asking you 'who hurt you', you specifically told me you were abused. You don't count it as abuse, but I do. Yes, the Left intentionally instills weakness onto children as a method of control. However, you don't teach children stoicism by being an emotionally out-of-control adult, screaming racial epithets at children. The adults actually have to be stoic. It's the same reason you don't call a child a 'cum dumpster'.
Yes, you are a damaged person if you think using racial epithets on children is a good idea. It's like saying, "you think I'm damaged just because I was sexually promiscuous at 13". Yes. Your behavior is an outgrowth of your abuse. Your rationalization of your behavior is the rationalization of your abuse. I don't care if you don't accept it, that's your problem to get over, not mine.
It's true, there's way to many absolute freaks here telling me that it's
okaya good thing to use racial slurs at children. Hell, one idiot just told me that women should be kept as slaves, which is a civilizing force, otherwise they'll kill society. You know, like totally normal people.Sometimes, I wonder if coming here is a service to you all, more than it is me, just so that you have literally any reference point to reality. Do not use racial slurs on children. Race wars are bad. The jews are not in your sock drawer. Women are people.
However, I think the issue might be that this place is under siege by the absolute fucking bottom-dwellers of society.
I've literally gotten more right-wing, as time has gone on. That should probably tell you what you are doing is becoming more deranged.
Of course it isn't. Work isn't this place. No one comes deliberately in my workplace to start shit, make eveyone's life worse, and belittle anyone who's working as 'a dirty jew'. What I'm doing is not a tactic, I just don't see the value in not explicitly condemning people for behaving like savages. Why tolerate them? They don't tolerate you!
Yes, public condemnation could help, but fundamentally you still don't do that with racial slurs.
I mean sure, but what's the point? A logical and rational discussion with people who have less than zero effort to operate in good faith? Look at my other thread with Telia at the moment. He and his friends running Nazi apologetics. He's pushing Nazism, but he's doing it in a direct contradiction to National Socialism. It's full gaslighting. "No nazi would ever hate another race! Nazism is just self-love, bro". If you read Mien Kampf, you know this isn't true.
Yes, when NPR made shit up from whole cloth it fucking pissed me off. It pisses me off here too. So why make a logical and rational discussion with people who know they are lying, and have no intention on being either logical, nor rational. Why should I take the time to convince someone who is unconvinceable, and who's audience is so blind they would fall for lies that could be explicitly debunked by simple observation. Why do you want me to have a 'logical and rational debate' with someone who is arguing that the moon is a hologram?
Including keeping the power of "slurs" alive by demanding everyone treat them as special and evil compared to literally any other word.
You keep dodging the fact that slurs aren't magical spells, they are learned words that people need to be taught are "more evil." There is no functional difference between calling him a nigger and a dumbass, unless you intentionally instilled that weakness into him to make him more easily emotionally upset and damageable.
You can whine and whine that you are totes more Right wing and we are the evil one, but you are the one literally sitting here repeating the same ideas and points of view of the Left. That is more indicative of your position than whatever you try to call yourself.
Yes, this place is filled with spergs. I am constantly arguing with them too. Its the consequence of people not having a healthy outlet for their growing rage and confusion at the state of society. They get shunted into the backest of back rooms if they aren't easily molded into compliance, with other spergs.
People who feel constantly under attack and paranoid for noticing literal reality in front of them, such as "there are a lot of Jews as executives" and "blacks seem to be violent." It is a position that breeds stronger under opposition, because if they could be shamed or attacked out of it they would have from the outset. There is a reason why interventions and cult deprogramming are massive fields full of delicate actions.
Not "I am smarter than you retard, just shut up and listen to me."
And here we are back to the martyr complex. You are the shining beacon of brilliance and normalcy here to make sure to "break the circle jerk" and "make sure someone disagrees with you."
All you ever do is make people more strong in their beliefs, the ones you call deranged, by presenting the opposition in such a poor and accusatory manner. If you think its a "service" then its the level where you are accomplishing the literal opposite of what you are meant to do. You know, like a Leftie "anti-racist" just creating more racism by attacking people for minor nothings.
You should really get over yourself, that is part of why this place is so damaging to you. You have convinced yourself of how right you are about everything, and that people's disagreement and dislike of you is a sign of you being more right (exactly the same as the resident anti-Jew sperg).
It is not a "left-wing" idea not to call children racial slurs. It is the opinion of every responsible adult. Anyone being a good parent agrees. I don't care that you think it's ridiculous for me to have a moral judgement against anyone using racial slurs towards children. This isn't a deontological argument. I'm not making an argument from first principles. It's simply always wrong to do it. It is a violation of children's innocence, done in a reckless manner to hurt them, for the sake of a selfish desire of an adult.
And you can tell me that you don't see the point in differentiating between insulting a child, and insulting a child with a racial slur, but you ought not to be insulting children. They should be disciplined. It should be avoided whenever possible, and the adult needs to control their emotional response.
Fair enough. Now what do you do when the cult is not interested in deprogramming, but is interested in taking over your hobby, company, neighborhood, school, etc. I'm not really worried about deconverting them with shame because there's not an argument to win, and the truth is that I'm on the defensive.
"Hey, this guy's a lunatic who's going to make you mass suicide your kids! He's a fucking psych!"
"Don't shun him! He's misunderstood! Let's just listen to what he has to say, and don't be judgey."
I was being facetious. Though, at this point you probably won't believe me anyway, but at least you have it.
The existence of slurs as a whole, especially as a special magical word that is extra evil is a Leftie idea in modern discourse. That is where we are failing to find any common ground.
Nigger means nothing, its a corruption of an old European language's word for black and barely resembles that word any longer. Its power is entirely self inflicted, and no child is born with a weakness into it in their genes. If this kid was damaged by it in an extra way, that is their parent/community/media literally breaking them in a specific way.
The child was in a public space committing a crime. That is an action that should be admonished in some way because children need to be raised. To use your very logic, having no one respond in opposition to what he is doing is creating the idea that what he is doing is acceptable and not opposed.
I've already given you what she said was rude, and it was a rash decision made in frustration to stop him from damaging her property. But to assign labels as large as abuse to it is nonsense, made from a place of fragility and privilege.
Again, the only way it is a massive damaging moment is if the child was already programmed to be damaged by the word. And that is not something she did, and the real abuse if any.
I don't make the problem worse if I'm unable to make it better.