Donating money to her clearly isn't a waste because of all the rats coming out of the woodwork to complain that people are fighting back against cancel culture. It's revealing how many supposedly right wing figures are liberal shills.
At this point Hendrix could be a mouth breathing OF prostitute and she would still have served a useful purpose to society.
Of course it isn't. Work isn't this place. No one comes deliberately in my workplace to start shit, make eveyone's life worse, and belittle anyone who's working as 'a dirty jew'. What I'm doing is not a tactic, I just don't see the value in not explicitly condemning people for behaving like savages. Why tolerate them? They don't tolerate you!
Yes, public condemnation could help, but fundamentally you still don't do that with racial slurs.
I mean sure, but what's the point? A logical and rational discussion with people who have less than zero effort to operate in good faith? Look at my other thread with Telia at the moment. He and his friends running Nazi apologetics. He's pushing Nazism, but he's doing it in a direct contradiction to National Socialism. It's full gaslighting. "No nazi would ever hate another race! Nazism is just self-love, bro". If you read Mien Kampf, you know this isn't true.
Yes, when NPR made shit up from whole cloth it fucking pissed me off. It pisses me off here too. So why make a logical and rational discussion with people who know they are lying, and have no intention on being either logical, nor rational. Why should I take the time to convince someone who is unconvinceable, and who's audience is so blind they would fall for lies that could be explicitly debunked by simple observation. Why do you want me to have a 'logical and rational debate' with someone who is arguing that the moon is a hologram?