Donating money to her clearly isn't a waste because of all the rats coming out of the woodwork to complain that people are fighting back against cancel culture. It's revealing how many supposedly right wing figures are liberal shills.
At this point Hendrix could be a mouth breathing OF prostitute and she would still have served a useful purpose to society.
It is not a "left-wing" idea not to call children racial slurs. It is the opinion of every responsible adult. Anyone being a good parent agrees. I don't care that you think it's ridiculous for me to have a moral judgement against anyone using racial slurs towards children. This isn't a deontological argument. I'm not making an argument from first principles. It's simply always wrong to do it. It is a violation of children's innocence, done in a reckless manner to hurt them, for the sake of a selfish desire of an adult.
And you can tell me that you don't see the point in differentiating between insulting a child, and insulting a child with a racial slur, but you ought not to be insulting children. They should be disciplined. It should be avoided whenever possible, and the adult needs to control their emotional response.
Fair enough. Now what do you do when the cult is not interested in deprogramming, but is interested in taking over your hobby, company, neighborhood, school, etc. I'm not really worried about deconverting them with shame because there's not an argument to win, and the truth is that I'm on the defensive.
"Hey, this guy's a lunatic who's going to make you mass suicide your kids! He's a fucking psych!"
"Don't shun him! He's misunderstood! Let's just listen to what he has to say, and don't be judgey."
I was being facetious. Though, at this point you probably won't believe me anyway, but at least you have it.
The existence of slurs as a whole, especially as a special magical word that is extra evil is a Leftie idea in modern discourse. That is where we are failing to find any common ground.
Nigger means nothing, its a corruption of an old European language's word for black and barely resembles that word any longer. Its power is entirely self inflicted, and no child is born with a weakness into it in their genes. If this kid was damaged by it in an extra way, that is their parent/community/media literally breaking them in a specific way.
The child was in a public space committing a crime. That is an action that should be admonished in some way because children need to be raised. To use your very logic, having no one respond in opposition to what he is doing is creating the idea that what he is doing is acceptable and not opposed.
I've already given you what she said was rude, and it was a rash decision made in frustration to stop him from damaging her property. But to assign labels as large as abuse to it is nonsense, made from a place of fragility and privilege.
Again, the only way it is a massive damaging moment is if the child was already programmed to be damaged by the word. And that is not something she did, and the real abuse if any.
I don't make the problem worse if I'm unable to make it better.