After speaking with @jacobawells on Spaces, he explained that the payment processors they utilize for their system are not owned by them. Because of this, these processors can exert pressure or cause problems that will ultimately derail everything. Because of this they disabled the comments before ((mainstream media)) leveraged a shut down. The campaign for Shiloh will continue 💯
Still sounds like a preemptive move. I would think they should wait for the actual demand for censorship to come, and then (perhaps after the campaigns finish) name and shame the party/ies threatening GSG.
I find this entirely believable, and while I don't like it, I can understand it. I watched what payment processors did to Gab in 2017, and it got so bad for a while the only way anyone could pay for their Gab Pro account was by mailing a paper check to a snail mail address. AFAIK Gab CEO Andrew Torba still doesn't have a personal debit card because Visa threatened to take away credit card processing from any bank he or Gab had an account with.
I believe we're in a moment right now where social or political pressure could be effectively applied against these money movers. Debanking has at least been brought into the spotlight recently, if only briefly. It needs addressing at some point.
The comments were bad but have you seen what white people wrote. Always find a way to attack white people and make them the worse. Is he self hating or a fellow white
this, name and shame when they request censorship is how this can start disintergrating.
As someone else pointed out what was done to gab getting more public view will not go well for them, they make these moves because they think they are faceless suits, the person they extort usual reciving all the heat for their descion.
they dont want people looking at how much power and influence they have because then they stand to loose it.
While I appreciate your attempt to be within the rules, you are still advocating violence, so it still needs to be removed. Using "[rule 2]" doesn't change the substance of what you're arguing.
You sound exactly like the guy being rightfully made fun of in the OP, and this thread. Hordes of comments by nons making threatening comments against White people is "free speech". But, if a single White person responds in kind, even to the smallest degree, all of a sudden it's bad, it's hate speech, and it must be censored.
Traitors deserve death.
That kind of speech is allowed under the 1st Amendment, and it's repeatedly been defended by the Supreme Court.
This coming just under 2 weeks after defending the anti-White comments on the Anthony page.
Edit: From the guy helping organize the fundraiser: https://xcancel.com/Tomhennessey69/status/1918529725649113201
Still sounds like a preemptive move. I would think they should wait for the actual demand for censorship to come, and then (perhaps after the campaigns finish) name and shame the party/ies threatening GSG.
I find this entirely believable, and while I don't like it, I can understand it. I watched what payment processors did to Gab in 2017, and it got so bad for a while the only way anyone could pay for their Gab Pro account was by mailing a paper check to a snail mail address. AFAIK Gab CEO Andrew Torba still doesn't have a personal debit card because Visa threatened to take away credit card processing from any bank he or Gab had an account with.
I believe we're in a moment right now where social or political pressure could be effectively applied against these money movers. Debanking has at least been brought into the spotlight recently, if only briefly. It needs addressing at some point.
Yes it does.
I personally am for making our own systems instead of trying to reform the existing one, because I don't believe the old systems are reformable.
The comments were bad but have you seen what white people wrote. Always find a way to attack white people and make them the worse. Is he self hating or a fellow white
this, name and shame when they request censorship is how this can start disintergrating.
As someone else pointed out what was done to gab getting more public view will not go well for them, they make these moves because they think they are faceless suits, the person they extort usual reciving all the heat for their descion.
they dont want people looking at how much power and influence they have because then they stand to loose it.
Comment Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
While I appreciate your attempt to be within the rules, you are still advocating violence, so it still needs to be removed. Using "[rule 2]" doesn't change the substance of what you're arguing.
You sound exactly like the guy being rightfully made fun of in the OP, and this thread. Hordes of comments by nons making threatening comments against White people is "free speech". But, if a single White person responds in kind, even to the smallest degree, all of a sudden it's bad, it's hate speech, and it must be censored.
Traitors deserve death.
That kind of speech is allowed under the 1st Amendment, and it's repeatedly been defended by the Supreme Court.