Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

91
Sanjay Gupta/ CNN now shilling for petroleum based food dyes because Trump wants to ban them (media.kotakuinaction2.win)
posted 1 year ago by Ahaus667 1 year ago by Ahaus667 +91 / -0
39 comments download share
39 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
▲ 10 ▼
– Stagecoach 10 points 1 year ago +10 / -0

I hate to defend CNN here but I just watched the video this screencap is from and it seems like they actually agree with the ban? Unless I missed something this post title seems misleading.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– Ahaus667 [S] 13 points 1 year ago +13 / -0

The part i caught was Gupta saying there was no known negative side effects in humans, its was cheaper, and created the brighter colors people “wanted” in their food.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– BollocksToBolsheviks 15 points 1 year ago +15 / -0

no known negative side effects in humans

Food additives have a really weird regulatory framework that effectively seems to operate under the presumption of safety, so if there's chatter that studies are starting to show something might be amiss with a given additive, manufacturers can proactively swap in new things that have no record of causing issues (because they have no record at all). This, along with cost savings, is why our favorite processed snacks don't hit like they used too: they've all got a treadmill of shifting ingredients and aren't same as we remember. The Twinkie of Theseus, if you will.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Stagecoach 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

He does do a "correlation not causation" bit and implies that, since the dyes are usually found in ultra-processed foods, it could be the ultra-processed aspect of the foods that are the source of harm. But I wouldn't have described it as "shilling" after seeing that video.

Right here he advises to not eat so many of those ultra-processed foods enter text

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– JustHereForTheSalmon 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Correlation not causation

Reddit's favorite mid-wit retort, so unsurprising CNN plays to it.

Multiple correlations lead to a proper hypothesis and leads to some actual science. But they just hand-wave it away, if they don't like what they think the hypothesis might be, to support whatever the NPC flagbearer shouts today.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– akira2501 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

and created the brighter colors people “wanted” in their food.

Meanwhile he'll tell you cigarette companies are super bad because they're modified to make them more appealing and addictive.

Which, from someone who completely removed processed foods from their diet, everything on that table looks exceptionally gross to me precisely because it's so unnaturally colored. That table is a dystopian masterpiece of our fucked up food system.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– HallucinatoryBeing 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

There's nothing like turning your toilet green after eating too much Blue No. 1.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– GamingTheSystem-01 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

The thing you're missing is that your measured reply has 3 points and the sensationalist op has 21 points, therefore you are wrong. Your mistake was wasting all that time watching the video instead of just posting directly with your amygdala.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy