https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermesmann_v._Seyer
Hermesmann v. Seyer was a precedent-setting Kansas, United States, case in which Colleen Hermesmann successfully argued that a woman is entitled to sue the father of her child for child support even if conception occurred as a result of a criminal act committed by the woman.[2][3] The case was brought in her name by the then Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services.
Colleen Hermesmann was a 16-year-old babysitter who in 1987 was hired to take care of 12-year-old Shane Seyer. The two began a sexual relationship, and when Hermesmann was 17 and Seyer was 13, the former became pregnant. The baby, a daughter, was born in 1989. Criminal charges were brought against Hermesmann by Shawnee County, Kansas, accusing her of "engaging in the act of sexual intercourse with a child under sixteen". Hermesmann ultimately took a plea bargain, pleading guilty to the lesser offense of "contributing to a child's misconduct".
In 1991, the Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services, in Hermesmann's name, took Seyer to court seeking child support. Hermesmann's criminal culpability was not addressed in this trial, as this was purely a civil court case. The Department also sought and was awarded $7,000, equivalent to $16,200 in 2024,[4] for its own costs.
And the ones mentioned here:
In 1996, the court heard the case of County of San Luis Obispo v. Nathaniel J in which a 34-year-old woman became pregnant after sexually exploiting a 15-year-old boy. He was also forced to pay child support, and then Deputy Attorney General Mary Roth alleged:
Remove ALL voting rights from women or at least make it women ALSO have to be part of the draft to vote.
It's a start as cases like this where ALL responsibilities are left to men but with zero benefits is why the West is so broken right now.
No you were right, remove all power privileges from women.
We can barely find men to be trustworthy of power, what makes anyone think we can find women, who are just men minus responsibility and accountability (and a penis) to be capable of handling power?
Repeal the 19th, raise the voting age to 25 and only property owners get to vote.
While this is a good idea originally, we have a lot more laws and problems to solve before this can be effective.
Because right now most Americans, regardless of quality, can't buy a house because Banks and Foreign Nationals are buying up the property. So this kind of idea just means "Chinese, Indians and Jews get to vote for American citizens."
Wait, they don't already?
At least at this moment we can pretend that every American has a vote, even if its all for show.
Under that requirement, they don't even have to pretend anymore. They can just price us all out until only the Elites can afford to vote.
I would say raise it to 35. 25 year olds are barely out of college.
Property owners is basically BlackRock and the bankers at this point.
Make it white and Christian property owners, then you can maybe have a semblance of your country back.