Like him or hate him, RGE is right about the western game industry
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
Someone I have been watching for a long time is Raging Golden Eagle. While I'm not too fond of him constantly glazing Chinese and Korean gachaslop, almost everything else, he has good takes and pretty funny as well. I think he's spot on in this video, that the western game industry realised it too late to jump on the new bandwagon and it's going to probably take decades to recover.
You hate gacha because it manipulates children and the gullible out of money.
I hate gacha because it will be permanently unplayable when the servers are switched off.
We are not the same.
At least some companies have already started releasing gacha games as "fully released" titles on Steam (and probably elsewhere wherever the Asians have access to) to keep them accessible once the servers go offline. Which I imagine is a trend that will only increase in prominence because its literally free money for assets that already exist.
What Square Enix is currently doing with Dragon Quest X, a defunct MMO, is the right move.
All content released as a fully functional OFFLINE RPG.
I know Squeenix has a lot of problems now, but I'm giving credit where credit is due.
Capcom did the same with the Megaman gacha game, which they removed all online features, rebalanced the economy around not having any MTX available, and then just let people buy it.
Which then became a huge modding scene since it was offline that allowed what is basically continued events and updates through the fanscene to keep it alive.
Same as Squeenix, a company with many problems but sometimes Capcom turns around a cool move like that too.
More like I have the same reason as you that's why I dislike live service games just as much. Personally I'm not fond the game model they are designed in, the fact that you have to always be online, pay money to unlock new stuff and I do not really like how game is designed around set of new updates/chapters.
Take Metal Gear Solid 1, 2, 3, 4 for example. They each tell separate whole stories in each of their own game, you don't need to play 1 or 2 to understand 3 or 4. Sure it helps to play the whole to understand the context. From what I seen of gacha, the quality of the story depends on the characters. To me that's quite disappointing.
Personally I don’t understand 4 anyway. Why didn’t Naomi just give Sunny the code for the worm at the start? Why have a pretend rescue and then pretend betray and then suicide? Why does every female but Meryl act like a whore? Why didn’t snake shoot ocelot in the first act instead of slowly walking out of cover with his gun trained on him? Why did snake trail the resistance guy and then start beating everyone up? Wasn’t he trying to join up with them. Why does eve keep her saggy gross tits out? Why doesn’t vamp attempt to dodge my bullets anymore? Liquid ocelot doesn’t act like liquid or ocelot, why is this?
I just found Hideo Kojima to really start to go off the rail and get far up his ass after the success of MGS 3. If you check out the chronology, you may see the name Tomokazu Fukushima on the writing team credit in 1, 2, 3. His name is missing after 3, meaning Fukushima's input must have been meaningful, or you could say his role was to tardwrangle Kojima making sure he doesn't go too wild.
RGE is transparently a contrarian, often motivated by jealousy. He often discards facts because he doesn't like who is saying them.
At least the Quaterpounder is up front about summarizing news stories and shilling his generic coffee.