Jesus fucking Christ. Now criticizing Jews is literally a moral malady and a spiritual sickness? Can you even conceive of a more retardedly overprotected class of people?
Given that Jews clearly possess this license to do whatever they want without pushback - because an atrocity befell them 75 fucking years ago - I'm curious: does anyone else get this license based on current or future hardships? What's the cutoff date for past atrocities justifying current behaviors? Is it literally 75 years? What about people who had literally fuck all to do with WW2? Should starving third world children living under the tyranny of African warlords still take special care not to upset the wealthiest and most influential demographic on the planet?
Yo RFK, what about muh racism? What about muh sexism? What about muh Islamophobia? Are these also spiritual sicknesses? Moral maladies? Muh homophobia? Muh transphobia? Why is this one category of people entitled to such special treatment even among all of the "oppressed" classes? We even need a special word to classify anyone who dares criticize them. Gee, I wonder why people are getting sick of this shit.
So RFKj is right that actual hatred is comparable to deadly diseases in death toll. And that colleges are breeding grounds, and the cure is free speech and debate.
I don't like his pro-Israel spin, but he's not wrong.
RFKj is right that actual hatred is comparable to deadly diseases in death toll
I don't know about you, but I don't believe the responsibilities of government departments and their secretaries should be based on similarity of death toll. At that rate the DoD should be involved in this because they deal with things that are comparable in death toll.
breeding grounds
the cure
Let's not pathologize things that aren't diseases. This is how we ended up with bullshit like climate health emergencies.
Some things spread like diseases and act like diseases even if they are not biological.
Like woke for instance, you get clusters of kids that all become trans, well how did that happen? Because they came in contact with a diseased person and the sickness spread.
Jesus fucking Christ. Now criticizing Jews is literally a moral malady and a spiritual sickness? Can you even conceive of a more retardedly overprotected class of people?
Given that Jews clearly possess this license to do whatever they want without pushback - because an atrocity befell them 75 fucking years ago - I'm curious: does anyone else get this license based on current or future hardships? What's the cutoff date for past atrocities justifying current behaviors? Is it literally 75 years? What about people who had literally fuck all to do with WW2? Should starving third world children living under the tyranny of African warlords still take special care not to upset the wealthiest and most influential demographic on the planet?
Yo RFK, what about muh racism? What about muh sexism? What about muh Islamophobia? Are these also spiritual sicknesses? Moral maladies? Muh homophobia? Muh transphobia? Why is this one category of people entitled to such special treatment even among all of the "oppressed" classes? We even need a special word to classify anyone who dares criticize them. Gee, I wonder why people are getting sick of this shit.
This is why I'm wary from the government reopening the asylums, because 'antisemitism' can be declared a mental illness.
Do more research about said "atrocity".
Only if you think any criticizing Jews is anti-semitism, which would pretty much make you a Jew.
Spanish flu: 500,000 Germans
Holocaust: more than that
Israel: 45,000 Palestinians killed
Natural causes: 20,000 Palestinians
So RFKj is right that actual hatred is comparable to deadly diseases in death toll. And that colleges are breeding grounds, and the cure is free speech and debate.
I don't like his pro-Israel spin, but he's not wrong.
This might be the single dumbest post on this thread yet
And yet you can't point to anything about it that's incorrect.
And you didn't point to anything about it that's incorrect. Because you can't.
I don't know about you, but I don't believe the responsibilities of government departments and their secretaries should be based on similarity of death toll. At that rate the DoD should be involved in this because they deal with things that are comparable in death toll.
Let's not pathologize things that aren't diseases. This is how we ended up with bullshit like climate health emergencies.
Some things spread like diseases and act like diseases even if they are not biological.
Like woke for instance, you get clusters of kids that all become trans, well how did that happen? Because they came in contact with a diseased person and the sickness spread.
It is a pathology; pathos means suffering, not biological infection. It's also a disease, a "harmful, depraved, or morbid condition, as of the mind or society"
So what I'm hearing from you is that you just don't like what he said and are rationalizing a reason to discount it.