Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

67
British journo is mad about J. K. Rowling, again (archive.ph)
posted 1 year ago by ArtemisFoul 1 year ago by ArtemisFoul +67 / -0
19 comments share
19 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (19)
sorted by:
▲ 34 ▼
– deleted 34 points 1 year ago +34 / -0
▲ 11 ▼
– Adamrises 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0

I promise that at least 70% of that enjoyment is just nostalgia.

A huge portion of the HP fandom are movie watchers, which fixed a lot of the book's issues in exchange for cutting a lot of the fluff.

There is a reason why the fandom took off more once there were a bunch of them and the actor's had gotten "hotter" for the teen girls to get off to on tumblr/livejournal.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– horstshort 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

A huge portion of the HP fandom are movie watchers, which fixed a lot of the book's issues in exchange for cutting a lot of the fluff.

What issues? Besides the many plotholes. Last time I read the series was two decades ago. Personally I didn't like the movies (back then, only watched the first 3 or 4) because they cut so much. Peeves missing entirely especially annoyed me.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Adamrises 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I actually don't remember and am repeating something I've heard as I didn't finish either series.

But I can assume with the benefit of hindsight the movies could iron out certain issues the books had, so I have no reason to question it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– voidposter 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

If you still like Harry Potter, I promise that at least 70% of that enjoyment is just nostalgia.

Yeah, but then how will I be able to understand current year politics, bigot?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Hugs 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

But now the golem is turning on its master and she gets all pissy that they're coming after her for not going along with troonism.

Absolutely, but I think it's not really trannies that Rowling opposes, but men. I've followed her on Twitter/X for awhile and can't remember a single instance where she condemned FtM trannies. It only seems to be MtF that she cares about. She often doesn't mention transgenderism at all and will instead specifically refer to "men in women's spaces."

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– ArtemisFoul [S] 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I never read any HP books, I think I saw the first two movies when they were on the TV but that's about the extent of my firsthand experience with the universe. I also think JKR is an annoying feminist bitch. But I don't think the bed she made is particularly bothering her. She's living in a castle and she's untouchable, she's basically the only Brit who can push back openly against the troons, because if they tried to jail her or even fine her, fucking Mumsnet would start a violent revolution.

I'm glad she's pushing the Overton Window back into normalcy at least a little bit. She could just write empty platitudes about muh trans rights, like every other entertainment industry whore, but she's not doing that. Good on her, even if she's friends with outright demons like Bindel.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 15 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 15 points 1 year ago +15 / -0

The UK establishment is forever pissed she's untouchable thanks to her money and connections and is very vocally against trans stuff.

Which is why her work, though alright I've read better stories, books hell even some of the current manga I'm reading, will live on for generations because they can't make her bend.

It is hilarious to watch.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– RadiateTonight 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

She's part of the establishment herself.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– ArtemisFoul [S] 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0

The main reason actors should be avoiding this new series, though, is a simple, moral one. Rowling, the creator of Harry Potter and an executive producer on the new show, has over the past few years devoted much of her time to sharing anti-transgender rhetoric on social media. She has become the de facto face of the anti-trans movement in Britain, and is, as a result, reviled by many trans people, queer people, and straight people with compassion for and awareness of the struggles facing the trans community.

It’s worth noting that it isn’t just some purely symbolic problem. As well as using her considerable public platform to proliferate anti-trans views, Rowling has donated large sums of money to organisations seeking to restrict trans rights through legislative change. This TV series will be making Rowling, already roughly a billionaire, richer, and to work on this project is to be complicit in it.

It is easier to make excuses for the younger cast members, the series promising as it does a huge amount of exposure, as well as what’s probably the biggest paycheck of their career. But it’s nonetheless a moral compromise, and, for many people outraged by Rowling, will tarnish their reputations going forward.

t’s almost certain that the new Harry Potter series will feature more diversity than the original, and will likely cast people of colour in some of the major previously white roles, as the stage show Harry Potter and the Cursed Child did when casting a Black actor as Hermione. But what this means, in practice, is that it will be actors of colour who are used as the face of the project, who will go out on press tours and are held to account for Rowling’s opinions.

It’s frankly rather ridiculous that a book series about the magical adventures of a boy wizard has become such a political minefield.

- The author who is desperately trying to make it into a political minefield

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Lurker404 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

Paapa Essiedu ... reportedly in the running to play the oily Professor Snape

LOL, peak current year Well, last year really at this point.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– CanuckElhead 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

I just pictured him yelling "I cant breathe" while being levitated against his will and my eyes rolled so hard I inverted my field of view.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– 83671R18 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Such shrieking over a non-issue, but these journo cretins never speak about the pisslamic rape gangs infesting the country.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Adamrises 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

And yet it will probably make hundreds of millions easily and they will continue to churn these articles out as they secretly watch it, while claiming something like they paid double the price of the movie to Tranny Lifeline so the charity pay cancels out the hate piece.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– m0r1arty 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Check out the burning misogyny from Louis Chilton!

Remakes aren't good things because they'll stiff over fans of the originals?

HAHAHA!

Yeah, that's our view and unless you pay up your Nazi membership card in full you can't have it!

There's no ambulances left to chase Louis, why don't you go back to cottaging in public toilets and leave the world alone?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Haterjuiced 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Some people are massive hypocrites but enough about kotakuinaction2.win...

permalink save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy