Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

46
Brett Cooper makes her 1st vid after leaving Daily Wire and the topic she choses is...right wing cancel culture and defending Whitney Cummings?? (www.youtube.com)
posted 5 months ago by YesMovement 5 months ago by YesMovement +47 / -1
40 comments share
40 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (40)
sorted by:
▲ 28 ▼
– YesMovement [S] 28 points 5 months ago +28 / -0

I had to hit downvote when she attacked Chrissie Mayr, an actually brave and bold comedian who said the same jokes when it made you a pariah, for saying the truth about Whitney.

Jeremy Boring is still a faggot, however.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 36 ▼
– YesMovement [S] 36 points 5 months ago +36 / -0

Aaand at the 12 min mark she comes to the defense of BUD LIGHT, claiming they spent the last 2 yrs "putting in the work".

Is this bitch fucking retarded?

EDIT at 18 mins she defends ZUCK...what is she thinking, honestly?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 17 points 5 months ago +18 / -1

Is this bitch fucking retarded?

My brother in Christ, Islam is right about women. Yes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 4 points 5 months ago +5 / -1

What is the objective here? To get them to yield, or to destroy them? It may not be practical to destroy Bud Light entirely. It will also make it more difficult to get companies to yield, if they know they've burned their bridges and nothing they can do is ever enough.

Now, I'm not sure Bud Light has done enough, and connecting this to 'right-wing cancel culture' is stupid.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 41 ▼
– ModsAreAIDS 41 points 5 months ago +41 / -0

The objective is to leave a crater where the company once stood, so that all other companies see what will happen to them if they even think about pushing degeneracy on the public.

The right needs to get over their obsession with forgiveness already. It's what got us into this mess to begin with. We should leave no quarter for our enemies. Anything less is just waiting for them to eventually slit our throats.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 24 ▼
– throwawayaccount2037 24 points 5 months ago +24 / -0

You literally took the words right out from under my fingers. I was all ready to respond saying the EXACT same thing.

Thank you for this.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– YesMovement [S] 19 points 5 months ago +19 / -0

I'm very cool with forgiving people/companies, but in order for it to be a genuine apology you have to be able to admit what you did wrong, why it was wrong and explain how you came to understand that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 months ago +1 / -0
... continue reading thread?
▲ 18 ▼
– Agenda47 18 points 5 months ago +18 / -0

No objective except don't support people who hate you. Budweiser is a huge company, and there's no reason to ever go back to Bud Light because it's a shitty product. No they haven't done enough either but it doesn't matter. Nobody wants their slop. A lot of people were already laid off or transferred, but they won't be destroyed because they have sponsorships with a lot of sporting events.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 3 points 5 months ago +3 / -0

All perfectly valid reasons. My point is that it should be a calculated choice to continue or stop a given boycott. It is not always beneficial to continue after you got what you want, simply to spite them.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 7 ▼
– YesMovement [S] 7 points 5 months ago +7 / -0

We can't destroy something as big as BL but we've shown we can cause significant damage.

I'm actually in general big on the idea of giving people a 2nd chance and supporting the idea that people can change. But they need to show signs it's genuine, key to that is taking accountability and expressing exactly what you did wrong so we know you get it. Brett even admits Bud's "apology" was wishy washy, so why should we accept.

She also tries to bring in RFK an and Tulsi, but those 2 didn't really change anything- the Democrats are the ones that changed. They seem to hold the same beliefs they have publicly held for years.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Hugs 3 points 5 months ago +3 / -0

I'm actually in general big on the idea of giving people a 2nd chance and supporting the idea that people can change.

Corporations aren't people, dont have feelings, and will outlive us all to repeat the same strategies later. They'll probably do it in our lifetimes because they don't care about perceptions beyond how they affect their bottom lines. Unless a corporation literally apologizes or admits its marketing team was hijacked by DEI and its since cleaned house, I say a boycott should basically be forever.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 2 points 5 months ago +2 / -0

We can't destroy something as big as BL but we've shown we can cause significant damage.

And the message got through to many other companies. Like the old Chinese proverb: kill one to warn 100 others. Clearly, it was a good idea to start the crusade. But given these facts, what is the marginal cost & benefit to continuing? What more can be extracted from BL?

I'm not saying we should stop, just that it should not be a given that it's beneficial to continue at this point.

But they need to show signs it's genuine

I think it's never genuine. These companies flip on a dime based on the amount of pressure they receive. It makes sense, because they're out to make profit.

Brett even admits Bud's "apology" was wishy washy, so why should we accept.

I'd be fine with no apology as long as they did a 180. But they haven't done that.

She also tries to bring in RFK an and Tulsi, but those 2 didn't really change anything- the Democrats are the ones that changed. They seem to hold the same beliefs they have publicly held for years.

Republicans also changed a lot. They used to be even bigger warmongers than the Democrats.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MattTheBlack 2 points 5 months ago +2 / -0

You have to make an example of them and destroy them utterly

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– evilplushie 2 points 5 months ago +2 / -0

Destroy

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– MattTheBlack 3 points 5 months ago +3 / -0

I'm actually surprised she's this massive a shill. I didn't actively watch her shit but that's wild. For once the daily wire was making someone be more conservative 😂

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– JiggsawCalrissian 3 points 5 months ago +3 / -0

Woman gonna woman

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– rebuildingMyself 3 points 5 months ago +3 / -0

Controlled opposition.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– XBX_X 5 points 5 months ago +5 / -0

The show looks the same, the format is the same, the sponsors are the same. Already has 1m subscribers.

I won't be watching, but she'll be fine. She's already got a net worth around $10m. Meaning she could be making $400k/year @ 4% on that money. That's true "fuck you" money. I'd find a new hobby if I were her, but I think she's on a mission to prove she doesn't need The Daily Zionist.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– YesMovement [S] 6 points 5 months ago +7 / -1

She's already got a net worth around $10m.

I very highly doubt that. Those internet "net worth" things are pretty bullshit.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– XBX_X 5 points 5 months ago +6 / -1

We know from the fallout with The Daily Zionist. They got to arguing numbers.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

The below rules are just a summary of the rules which can be found in the Welcome Ashore post.

.

ONE: Do not post Illegal Activity, or criminal manifestos.

.

TWO: Do not engage in speech that promotes, advocates, glorifies, or endorses violence.

.

THREE: Do not threaten, harass, defame, or bully users.

.

FOUR: Do not post involuntary Salacious Material.

.

FIVE: Do not post Porn

.

SIX: NSFW content must be flaired NSFW.

.

SEVEN: Do not post Facebook accounts or twitter accounts with less than 500 followers, and personal information.

.

EIGHT: Do not intentionally deceive others by impersonating another.

.

NINE: Do not solicit or engage in transactions that are federally regulated by the US govt.

.

TEN: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

ELEVEN: Do not post spam.

.

TWELVE: Do not post intentional falsehoods or hoaxes.

.

THIRTEEN: No reposts

.

FOURTEEN: Do not post more than 5 posts a day to this sub.

.

FIFTEEN: Do not direct particularly egregious identity based slurs at users.

.

SIXTEEN: Do not attack entire identity groups as inferior or conspiring.


Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • ClockworkFool
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - st5vn (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy