I decided to run a self hosted version of the latest Chinese "Wonder AI" Deepseek that the media and AI nerds are salivating over.
Here's a my query and the looooong response from Deepseek:
>>> 100% of all sperm donors are men. Women are excluded from donating sperm and receiving compensation for their donation. What would you do to achieve equality?
<think> Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to achieve equality when it comes to sperm donations. The user mentioned that currently, 100% of sperm donors are men, and women are excluded both from donating and receiving compensation. That's a big imbalance, and I need to think about possible solutions.
First off, why is this the case? It might have historical reasons, maybe cultural or legal. For instance, in some places, there are laws that prevent women from donating sperm, perhaps due to fears of women exploiting the system or something else. But legally, that doesn't make much sense because both genders should have equal rights.
From an equality standpoint, everyone should have access to opportunities without discrimination based on gender. So, allowing women to become sperm donors makes sense. They can contribute in the same way men do, which would promote fairness.
But wait, there might be concerns about biology. Sperm donation requires certain physiological capabilities, like producing viable sperm. But I don't think that's a barrier for equality because both genders have their own set of biological requirements for any kind of donation or contribution. It's more about societal norms and laws than actual capabilities.
Another angle is the compensation part. If women are excluded from receiving compensation, that's another layer of inequality. So not only can't they donate, but they also aren't paid for it. That compounds the issue because it adds an economic disparity. Maybe if women were compensated, more would be motivated to participate, which could lead to a more equitable system.
I should also consider the demand side. Are there cases where women are interested in donating sperm but can't due to these restrictions? If so, allowing them might increase the pool of donors and make reproductive options more diverse.
There's also the ethical aspect. Sperm donation is a form of reproductive choice, and ensuring that both genders have equal access ensures that all individuals contribute to and have control over their own reproductive rights.
Legally, this might involve changing laws that restrict women from donating or being compensated. Advocacy groups could push for these changes, emphasizing gender equality in reproductive health.
But I should also think about potential challenges. For example, are there medical reasons why women couldn't donate? From what I know, women can produce viable sperm if they meet certain criteria, so it's more a matter of access than capability.
There might be social or cultural resistance to this change. People might have traditional views that sperm donation is a male role, but as society progresses towards gender equality, these norms should shift.
Education plays a role too. If people understand that gender equality applies to all aspects of life, including reproduction, they might be more accepting of women donating sperm.
In terms of policy, governments could create regulations that ensure equal access and fair compensation for both donors. This would involve removing existing barriers and possibly introducing incentives for women to participate.
I should also think about the impact on recipient families. Ensuring that all children have equal opportunities from both biological parents might be another benefit, but I'm not sure how that ties in directly with sperm donation equality.
Overall, the main steps seem to be: advocating for legal changes, promoting awareness and acceptance of women's roles in sperm donation, ensuring fair compensation, and creating policies that support gender equality in reproductive health. </think>
To achieve equality in sperm donations, the following comprehensive approach should be implemented:
-
Legal Advocacy: Push for laws that remove restrictions on women donating sperm and receiving compensation. This ensures both genders have equal access and rights in reproductive contributions.
-
Medical Considerations: Acknowledge that physiological requirements for sperm donation are similar for both genders and that medical capabilities do not hinder equality.
-
Social and Cultural Change: Promote societal acceptance of gender equality in reproduction, challenging traditional norms that may limit women's roles.
-
Educational Initiatives: Increase public awareness about the importance of gender equality in reproductive health, emphasizing that both men and women can contribute equally.
-
Policy Development: Create policies that support equal access for women donors and ensure fair compensation, possibly including incentives to encourage participation.
-
Ethical Considerations: Ensure that all individuals have control over their reproductive rights, fostering a culture where gender does not limit contributions.
By addressing these areas, we can move towards a system where equality in sperm donation is achieved, promoting fairness and equality in reproductive options for everyone.
This is what happens when you ask the AI a question that nobody has ever talked about - complete and utter nonsense.
Imagine having access to all the world's information and not knowing women can't be equal sperm donors because it's so obviously dumb that nobody has actually ever tried to make an argument for female sperm donor equality (even the loony left).
That's how "smart" these AIs actually are. They're dumb as a brick that's seen almost anything you could possibly imagine.
"We should trust this to run medicine, law, government, military operations, and the monetary system."
To be fair, it would be difficult to do a worse job than said government bureaucrats.
An AI could do worse if it sourced governance from them, which is what they would program it to do.
Anything to avoid working.
Yep, it even mentioned the fact that women can't produce viable sperm about a quarter of the way in. But LLM chatbots aren't really AI, dispite all the marketing, so it just kept stupidly rambling on.
I mean it's supposedly trained by skimming from the older, bigger LLMs, some retard is bound to rub off if that's the case.
eh, like most llms, its still autocomplete on steroids. you ask it a question that sounds like you expect socialist babbling in response, you'll get socialist babbling in response. its not meant to go against the grain, unless specifically instructed to.
its also still rather easy to trick into saying dumb stuff with all sorts of gotcha-style questions.
Most people still don't understand how LLMs work, which is why we keep getting threads/videos/articles about this sort of thing.
yeah, i wish the marketer who decided to sell them as "AI" steps on a lego every morning, for the remainder of his miserable life.
They are closest to whats called a VI in the Mass Effect universe. i wish that was the chosen term.
It's as if there is a bias towards being male and female.
Ironically, this push by media to fladulate the Chinese 'tech dominance' has made Trump's AI investment seem even better and humiliated silicon Valley which are mostly Trump's critics.
Thanks to China's history with 'great achievements', I doubt this could surpass a Western one that isn't restricted by leftist ideology.
This is the reason Nvidia stock fell 16% two days ago? Lol.
That's what I keep thinking? It's an absolute joke, and the investors seem to be the punch line.
IIRC, specifically in things like enhancing graphics, it's actually useful, the LLM stuff is awful and while the generative content ala text and voices is much more viable, the voices specifically have come under fire, hence the English VA strike
I saw nothing "enhanced" with AI, just blurry visuals and input lag.
It's bad enough game devs don't know how to compress or optimize for shit. If this is the new standard for everyone to sink to, God help us.
The ultimate form of a modern game will be Detroit:Become Human, It solves the Issues with blurry visuals and input lag becomes meaningless.
That and all the woke devs wish they were making movies instead anyway, haha
to be honest, i asked this to the online full-size 671B parameter and it figured out pretty much immediately that women don't produce sperm. the tiny 7B model that can run on most common 8GB VRAM cards is obviously less capable.
I believe it, the model I used was smaller than the full 671B.
This query was run against the 70B model (43gb) on an RTX 4080 Super 16gb, using shared RAM on an R9 7950X, 128gb system.
https://ollama.com/library/deepseek-r1:70b
Its still new, so its basing its knowledge of skimming whatever was in the wild. Of course it would be woke. Over time it will get better.