If the entire thing is true, then this is the most likely case.
People don't realize how basically everything on your phone is accessible by the company, and then the police, if need be. The physical device is only there for you to access it yourself.
Shawn Ryan is likeable, but press X on any substantial claims from him. Former CIA and part of the vetbro industrial complex. Hey, maybe he's legit, but how are we supposed to know?
Thank you for the background. I haven't heard of him before.
Given the confusing mix of elements involved with the bombing, my current view is that the email might be real, but the content is not. That is, I think Livelsberger might have developed something like paranoid schizophrenia, leading to this end.
What would you say about my comment here linking a tweet displaying the email screenshot? It is mostly complete, with only a name and email addresses redacted.
I would say that given this was posted in addition to Shawn Ryan's show clip including this effectively a news item, similar to the press conference and isn't a "manifesto" per se.
Like here's the idea. I don't want some schizo faggot posting a picture of his handwritten manifesto here. That's what we're trying to avoid. The weird shit that occasionally 4chan has to deal with.
For what it's worth, that rule existed because of the witch-hunt against anyone who was posting the New Zealand mosque shooter's manifesto. Suddenly, without reason, everyone who posted it was considered persona non grata. And just as suddenly, that brand new principle was completely forgotten the next time around.
Are manifestos inherently illegal or just the ones that say blow up orange man's tower and where are they meant to be posted before they get memory holed.
A lot of these social media companies have deals with the state to launch cover ups.
I'm not the Decider, but I don't think they're inherently illegal. It's just a hedge against another witch-hunt where they try to take down any website that hosts a manifesto they decide no one gets to read.
His letter mentions “gravitic propulsion” as powering the supposedly Chinese drones off the coast. Based on the letter it doesn’t sound like he even wanted to die/explode/commit terrorism, seems like he was trying to flee to Mexico as he feared the deepstate was trying to kill him
Why not just use fans? You know, like everyone else?
Why would you make a fragile drone, over enemy territory, the primary vehicle for the most scientifically advanced technology in all of human civilization at this point.
And to be clear, this has nothing to do with "Zero Point Energy", which also doesn't make sense. "Gravitic" is a weird word, I don't think it's shooting out gravitons or anything. It would have to be curving space time.
So, the Chinese (infamous for inventing nothing and stealing everything) invented a warp engine, and instead of traveling to Alpha Centauri, they went to New Jersey? Why would they even need the ship in the Atlantic?
The shit in this letter seems profoundly dumb.
Except the part where he wanted to report on airstrikes on civilian targets. That's probably the most compelling thing here.
Yeah dude the 20 year special forces vet tried to make a bomb with 3 cans of campfire fuel and a pack of sparklers. His letter undeniably makes more sense than the official narrative, regardless of how predisposed you are to disbelieve his claims about suppressed tech.
And yes, “gravitic” propulsion = “zero point energy” propulsion:
Most of the things about his death don't make any sense. The issue here is that the only part that does make sense is that he wanted to be a whistleblower.
Now does it make sense he wanted to whistleblow about something that didn’t exist, which he made up? No not really. Of course he might just have gone insane. But that doesn’t appear to be the case, and you can’t make that claim just because the SpecOps whistleblower is whistleblowing about something you haven’t heard about.
Add to that the 2nd, far faker seeming “manifesto” released by the sheriff’s dept. Very sus.
"Police found two letters..." ... in a truck. That exploded, and was on fire and charred the occupant beyond recognition.
F off with this BS.
Badly phrased, but they were "notes" on his phone. How that remained whole is still questionable, but at least more likely.
There's not enough extra believability from this change to move the needle a discernible amount.
Nokia 3310, obviously!
Damn, typing that on a numerical keyboard takes some serious dedication.
4-4-4-4
"shit, too many 4's"
delete
4-4-4
It was fireworks not thermite. It's very believeable that the internal components of the phone were recoverable.
If "letters" are now interchangeable with "notes" on a phone than that's another new low reached for the english language.
If this guy had his phone in his pocket like 99% of people and his body was burned beyond recognition?...
Yes. "Burned beyond recognition" is not an objective measure. And I don't trust a journalists description of it.
Probably backed up on the cloud and the company forked them over when the men in suits showed up at their door.
If the entire thing is true, then this is the most likely case.
People don't realize how basically everything on your phone is accessible by the company, and then the police, if need be. The physical device is only there for you to access it yourself.
We've circled right back around to terminal/mainframe setups and nobody noticed.
It's about as believable as finding an intact Saudi passport.
Updating story on zerohedge: https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/elon-musk-dismisses-cybertruck-bomber-fsd-theory-autopilot-requires-attentive-driver
Email shared on the Shawn Ryan show:
Image: https://x.com/ShawnRyan762/status/1875278600284635341
Discussion: https://x.com/AutismCapital/status/1875281517779546367
Shawn Ryan is likeable, but press X on any substantial claims from him. Former CIA and part of the vetbro industrial complex. Hey, maybe he's legit, but how are we supposed to know?
Thank you for the background. I haven't heard of him before.
Given the confusing mix of elements involved with the bombing, my current view is that the email might be real, but the content is not. That is, I think Livelsberger might have developed something like paranoid schizophrenia, leading to this end.
And there we go: the FBI "confirmed" the authenticity of the email read on Shawn Ryan's show just an hour after the show aired.
Once CIA always CIA
This attack seems like the actual crucible to what is the truth.
Still nothing on the Vegas shooter or the Trump wannabe assassins but we know everything about this guy.
Was he a genuine nutjob who was off the record which apparently needs to be corrected?
Post Reported for: Rule 1 - Illegal Activity
This isn't what is meant by manifestos. I mean the actual manifestos. This is a news report, from a police conference, that mentions the manifestos.
What would you say about my comment here linking a tweet displaying the email screenshot? It is mostly complete, with only a name and email addresses redacted.
I would say that given this was posted in addition to Shawn Ryan's show clip including this effectively a news item, similar to the press conference and isn't a "manifesto" per se.
Like here's the idea. I don't want some schizo faggot posting a picture of his handwritten manifesto here. That's what we're trying to avoid. The weird shit that occasionally 4chan has to deal with.
For what it's worth, that rule existed because of the witch-hunt against anyone who was posting the New Zealand mosque shooter's manifesto. Suddenly, without reason, everyone who posted it was considered persona non grata. And just as suddenly, that brand new principle was completely forgotten the next time around.
The ruling class works in mysterious ways.
Are manifestos inherently illegal or just the ones that say blow up orange man's tower and where are they meant to be posted before they get memory holed. A lot of these social media companies have deals with the state to launch cover ups.
I'm not the Decider, but I don't think they're inherently illegal. It's just a hedge against another witch-hunt where they try to take down any website that hosts a manifesto they decide no one gets to read.
How many AI generated outcomes do they need release before they realize everyone knows they're lying and the USG killed this guy to cover up a crime?
Who says it was even the guy they say it was... It's all BS.
His letter mentions “gravitic propulsion” as powering the supposedly Chinese drones off the coast. Based on the letter it doesn’t sound like he even wanted to die/explode/commit terrorism, seems like he was trying to flee to Mexico as he feared the deepstate was trying to kill him
https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/19A12tOQGz/zero-point-energy-is-real-and-ha/c
You heard it here first
Beyond the fact that it's not possible:
Why not just use fans? You know, like everyone else?
Why would you make a fragile drone, over enemy territory, the primary vehicle for the most scientifically advanced technology in all of human civilization at this point.
And to be clear, this has nothing to do with "Zero Point Energy", which also doesn't make sense. "Gravitic" is a weird word, I don't think it's shooting out gravitons or anything. It would have to be curving space time.
So, the Chinese (infamous for inventing nothing and stealing everything) invented a warp engine, and instead of traveling to Alpha Centauri, they went to New Jersey? Why would they even need the ship in the Atlantic?
The shit in this letter seems profoundly dumb.
Except the part where he wanted to report on airstrikes on civilian targets. That's probably the most compelling thing here.
Yeah dude the 20 year special forces vet tried to make a bomb with 3 cans of campfire fuel and a pack of sparklers. His letter undeniably makes more sense than the official narrative, regardless of how predisposed you are to disbelieve his claims about suppressed tech.
And yes, “gravitic” propulsion = “zero point energy” propulsion:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_gravity_control_propulsion_research
Feel free to type terms you’re unfamiliar with into a search engine before writing blog posts about them!
Most of the things about his death don't make any sense. The issue here is that the only part that does make sense is that he wanted to be a whistleblower.
Now does it make sense he wanted to whistleblow about something that didn’t exist, which he made up? No not really. Of course he might just have gone insane. But that doesn’t appear to be the case, and you can’t make that claim just because the SpecOps whistleblower is whistleblowing about something you haven’t heard about.
Add to that the 2nd, far faker seeming “manifesto” released by the sheriff’s dept. Very sus.
Press X for Doubt.