Gay/whore kids are the female version of funko pops
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (75)
sorted by:
while I maintain homosexuality in and of itself is not harmful (even if there's a lot of harm within the community and harm itself is often would drive someone to it), there's nothing good about being a whore. You destroy your body, and destroy your social credibility, and think a lack of self-control is empowering.
Not to get too far down this particular rabbit hole, but everything you said about being a whore is just as, if not moreso, applicable to male homosexuals. Female homosexuals seem to be outwardly slightly less degenerate, but they have higher domestic abuse rates and worse mental illness rates (iirc) than both gay males and heteros.
Not to mention the frankly incredible rates of disease.
Every time this is mentioned I wonder if it's actual abuse rate or just report rates. If women are the more likely partner vs men to report domestic abuse, real or made up, then a pairing of two women are unsurprisingly going to result in lot more reports because modern society has not only moulded them to wield these accusations as weapons but also provided the very weapons and infrastructure through kangaroo courts to do so with little to no cost even when making shit up.
It may still be a true statement, in part because men are likely also under-reporting abuse for a whole list of reasons, so women having a higher threshold to both report on actual events as well as making shit up means lesbians are always going to be top of the pile when it comes to this.
tl;dr I think the actual numbers are far, far murkier than any initial glance offers. Men probably under-report, women probably over-report, and women also probably flat out make up reports. All of which means lesbian numbers score highest.
The weird thing is that lesbians aren't actually the top of the pile. Bi women are. You'll notice though that these stats are never presented in a per-partner fashion and are always something like: "experiencing intimate partner violence in their lifetime." So if one group has more partners, they'd have the higher lifetime DV stat all else being equal.
Then the obvious question is "why aren't gay men #1?" Probably a mix of DV not being likely in casual encounters, men reporting far far less, and men knowing that they'll get hit back if they start shit.
I actually agree with all of this, even if it dulls the edge of a talking point I love to bring up. At the very least though, even with all this considered, I think it is easily justifiable to say that the level of dysfunction in lesbian relationships is greater than any other style of pairing, since even if they're just bullshit reports, the level of bullshit reports is higher than others.
I disagree. there is certainly heavily overlap between being a whore and being a homosexual, but one does not automatically indicate the other.
Things like sexual promiscuity, disease, and genital/rectal injury are all direct consequences of being a whore. Becoming homosexual is also a possible consequence of being a whore, but homosexuality in and of itself does not indicate whoredom.
homosexuality, in the most literal terms, brings about sexual arousal from the same sex. The word has nothing to do with sexual promiscuity. While homosexuals are statistically more likely to be whores, a truly monogamous homosexual is in fact not a whore and does not suffer the consequences of being a whore.
"promiscuity, disease, rectal injury"
You just described gay men.
There is no such thing as a monogamous homosexual, furthermore. Just at least one liar.
I described gay whores, a subset of gay men, not the entirety.
Male homosexuality by definition requires a large amount of anal sex, which in all forms is destructive to both your body and health, and both those destructions happen to be everyone's problem because you live in society where we have to deal with your broken, disease riddled ass (just the same as with a whore). Heteros might have anal sex, but its far less frequent because its not the only option.
So by its very existence, its harmful. Unless they just don't have primary forms of sex at all, which also applies to whores too!
Not by definition. Homosexuality involves sex with the same sex, be it the singular act with a single person OR the promiscuous act with many. The word does not care how specifically this act is carried out.
Words mean things. Conflating words deludes our ability to define the world.
Except they are going to do it, enough so that we can generalize without much room for error. We all know it, and trying to enforce a strictly pedantic definition to win your argument (that I admitted in the other comment was poorly phrased on my end) is the same Leftist tactic of "I know a black guy with a PhD so their average IQ stat is wrong."
Do you also think pedophiles are not necessarily harmful because you can be attracted to children without ever acting upon it? That MAPs should be protected and welcomed because they haven't committed any crimes until they do? Because that's the same line of reasoning you are now reaching for.
fucking or wanting to fuck single child is always bad and begets the woodchipper.
comparing pedophilia to homosexuality is not a good comparison though, because pedophilia is inherently evil but homosexuality isn't. One can be a homosexual with a consenting party and the only possible harm they bring is to themselves and said consensing party. A pedophile will never have a consenting party.
And male heterosexuality, by definition, requires a large amount of vaginal sex. That's why being straight and being an incel are mutually exclusive /s
The "in" part of incel stands for involuntary, as in they'd absolutely be having it if they could. Probably in weird and gross ways, but still all up in that gash.
That's the point I was making. Whatever-sexuality is the desire/arousal aspect.
Actually having the sex isn't a prerequisite. Unless you want to go for some weird semantic argument where all virgins are "asexual."
Anal sex is of course, extremely common among homosexual men. But "by definition," is just plain wrong because that's not part of the definition.
It does not. You can do only oral
And teens can just practice abstinence.
Except we both know that isn't going to happen in either case.
As long as we are clear it's still gay. lol
Just as well that that guy is gay anyway. He looks like he's 140lbs soaking wet. No woman is going to be interested in him.
He looks like he had weird hormone exposure in the womb.