Gay/whore kids are the female version of funko pops
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (75)
sorted by:
Male homosexuality by definition requires a large amount of anal sex, which in all forms is destructive to both your body and health, and both those destructions happen to be everyone's problem because you live in society where we have to deal with your broken, disease riddled ass (just the same as with a whore). Heteros might have anal sex, but its far less frequent because its not the only option.
So by its very existence, its harmful. Unless they just don't have primary forms of sex at all, which also applies to whores too!
Not by definition. Homosexuality involves sex with the same sex, be it the singular act with a single person OR the promiscuous act with many. The word does not care how specifically this act is carried out.
Words mean things. Conflating words deludes our ability to define the world.
Except they are going to do it, enough so that we can generalize without much room for error. We all know it, and trying to enforce a strictly pedantic definition to win your argument (that I admitted in the other comment was poorly phrased on my end) is the same Leftist tactic of "I know a black guy with a PhD so their average IQ stat is wrong."
Do you also think pedophiles are not necessarily harmful because you can be attracted to children without ever acting upon it? That MAPs should be protected and welcomed because they haven't committed any crimes until they do? Because that's the same line of reasoning you are now reaching for.
fucking or wanting to fuck single child is always bad and begets the woodchipper.
comparing pedophilia to homosexuality is not a good comparison though, because pedophilia is inherently evil but homosexuality isn't. One can be a homosexual with a consenting party and the only possible harm they bring is to themselves and said consensing party. A pedophile will never have a consenting party.
Except in this case it is. Either we go with the strictest definitions and neither of them are "inherently evil" because they are simple thought crimes with no victim besides yourself, or we accept the obvious conclusions to these labels as inevitable to happen and thereby part of that definition.
You can't strip the homo down to its barest, strictest and most pedantic definition to say "its not evil then!" and then turn around and treat pedos with all their baggage to use your woodchipper meme. That is literal Leftist argumentation for why they pretend that MAPs are a distinct thing from pedos in the first place.
Its a failed argument, and its not even getting into the huge overlap of pedophiles and homosexual men to begin with.
And male heterosexuality, by definition, requires a large amount of vaginal sex. That's why being straight and being an incel are mutually exclusive /s
The "in" part of incel stands for involuntary, as in they'd absolutely be having it if they could. Probably in weird and gross ways, but still all up in that gash.
That's the point I was making. Whatever-sexuality is the desire/arousal aspect.
Actually having the sex isn't a prerequisite. Unless you want to go for some weird semantic argument where all virgins are "asexual."
Anal sex is of course, extremely common among homosexual men. But "by definition," is just plain wrong because that's not part of the definition.
You are right, it was a poor way of phrasing it because there is the possibility of being a homo and not having sex.
But the vast majority will be, just like the vast majority of heteros will as well, so the point remains either way regardless of that semantical failing of my currently ill mind.
It does not. You can do only oral
And teens can just practice abstinence.
Except we both know that isn't going to happen in either case.
As long as we are clear it's still gay. lol