Gay/whore kids are the female version of funko pops
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (75)
sorted by:
I disagree. there is certainly heavily overlap between being a whore and being a homosexual, but one does not automatically indicate the other.
Things like sexual promiscuity, disease, and genital/rectal injury are all direct consequences of being a whore. Becoming homosexual is also a possible consequence of being a whore, but homosexuality in and of itself does not indicate whoredom.
homosexuality, in the most literal terms, brings about sexual arousal from the same sex. The word has nothing to do with sexual promiscuity. While homosexuals are statistically more likely to be whores, a truly monogamous homosexual is in fact not a whore and does not suffer the consequences of being a whore.
"promiscuity, disease, rectal injury"
You just described gay men.
There is no such thing as a monogamous homosexual, furthermore. Just at least one liar.
I described gay whores, a subset of gay men, not the entirety.
A general rule does not preclude against the existence of an outlier, and vice versa.
The vast majority of them are "whores" as you would put it. And that is the case because one depravity inevitably leads to more. Hence why pedophilia is so prevalent there as well.
And thus the inherent harm.
right, and a definition does not describe a general rule. It is correct to say that most gay men are whores because that describes an observation made about gay men. However there is still the distinction between "gay man" and "whore", because one describes sexual attraction andthe other describes sexual promiscuity. Lumping them together dilutes the definition.