Let me get this right...to protect Jews, the government just made it illegal to claim the government is controlled by Jews.
Also, denying or questioning the exact telling of history. Current history. Since it's changed a few times already.
Or of accusing Jews of being more loyal to Israel than "their own countries." I mean...what if they say openly that that's the case, and they're more loyal to Israel than where they are living? Is that still illegal? Can I not accuse Ben Shapiro, for example, of being more loyal to Israel than the US? He's said as much.
Also, since when does "the right to self-determination" come with a guarantee of an ethno-state...and how do I get in on that grift? Would certainly make things simple, if ethnostates were a yuman right.
And, uh...Jews did kill Jesus.
It's all so tiresome. But tell me again about the wonders of Judeo-Christian values. Also, the absolute arrogance (and, admittedly, massive power move, so props; impressive, if nothing else) that they managed to make it so other religions also have to acknowledge them as the Chosen Ones. I don't care if your own religion says you're chosen by God. That's pretty standard fare. But I don't have to believe it, and it's not hateful of me to refuse to state that you're better and more holy than I, because of your race. Absolutely ridiculous.
Even the rules here also technically bans the bible. The bible specifically says jews killed Jesus, but the rules here say that we can't collectively blame an identity group for something even though that's exactly what the bible does.
we can't collectively blame an identity group for something even though that's exactly what the bible does.
I guess the problem is blaming all jews for what #notalljews did. On the one hand, it wasn't like every single jew was hunting down Jesus for "heresy." Some, perhaps many, sought him out for wisdom or healing. On the other hand, the argument could be made that any group of jews would have demanded Jesus be crucified in a similar setting. The issue is taking in the symbolism of the scene versus the explicit text. That is, it is not explicitly stated that the whole jewish population did or would have done this (he had his disciples y'know).
I don't care if your own religion says you're chosen by God. That's pretty standard fare
Actually this was rescinded because God let them know that they were whores who kept whoring themselves out to other gods (the entire book of Hosea is about Israel being nothing but whores, which is why God had Hosea marry a whore so he would know what it felt like); they broke the Covenant he made with them COUNTLESS times. Even though he kept giving them multiple second chances.
Anyway, that was the whole point of Jesus dying on the cross, so everyone could be saved through him because Jews were no longer going to be the only ones to be chosen to inherit God's gifts, and Revelations basically makes it known that they would lose everything and constantly fall under the oppression of their enemies because they couldn't stop being whores (literally and figuratively).
Dude is a boomer. The percentage of based boomers can be counted on one hand. Expecting any boomer leader to step up and criticize the Jews and not be Israel's bitch is foolish.
Let me get this right...to protect Jews, the government just made it illegal to claim the government is controlled by Jews.
Also, denying or questioning the exact telling of history. Current history. Since it's changed a few times already.
Or of accusing Jews of being more loyal to Israel than "their own countries." I mean...what if they say openly that that's the case, and they're more loyal to Israel than where they are living? Is that still illegal? Can I not accuse Ben Shapiro, for example, of being more loyal to Israel than the US? He's said as much.
Also, since when does "the right to self-determination" come with a guarantee of an ethno-state...and how do I get in on that grift? Would certainly make things simple, if ethnostates were a yuman right.
And, uh...Jews did kill Jesus.
It's all so tiresome. But tell me again about the wonders of Judeo-Christian values. Also, the absolute arrogance (and, admittedly, massive power move, so props; impressive, if nothing else) that they managed to make it so other religions also have to acknowledge them as the Chosen Ones. I don't care if your own religion says you're chosen by God. That's pretty standard fare. But I don't have to believe it, and it's not hateful of me to refuse to state that you're better and more holy than I, because of your race. Absolutely ridiculous.
Even the rules here also technically bans the bible. The bible specifically says jews killed Jesus, but the rules here say that we can't collectively blame an identity group for something even though that's exactly what the bible does.
I guess the problem is blaming all jews for what #notalljews did. On the one hand, it wasn't like every single jew was hunting down Jesus for "heresy." Some, perhaps many, sought him out for wisdom or healing. On the other hand, the argument could be made that any group of jews would have demanded Jesus be crucified in a similar setting. The issue is taking in the symbolism of the scene versus the explicit text. That is, it is not explicitly stated that the whole jewish population did or would have done this (he had his disciples y'know).
Actually this was rescinded because God let them know that they were whores who kept whoring themselves out to other gods (the entire book of Hosea is about Israel being nothing but whores, which is why God had Hosea marry a whore so he would know what it felt like); they broke the Covenant he made with them COUNTLESS times. Even though he kept giving them multiple second chances.
Anyway, that was the whole point of Jesus dying on the cross, so everyone could be saved through him because Jews were no longer going to be the only ones to be chosen to inherit God's gifts, and Revelations basically makes it known that they would lose everything and constantly fall under the oppression of their enemies because they couldn't stop being whores (literally and figuratively).
How is this not an easy case for first amendment violation?
Because the first amendment doesn't apply if you're criticizing the jews (anymore.)
It is. Overruling this might be one of the only things this SCOTUS is unanimous about (except maybe Kagan).
blatantly unconstitutional and should result in public floggings.
Tony would like to remind everyone that the Jews invented GPS and you use GPS therefore Jews are good. Imp would like to add this is women’s fault.
Blatant violation of our constitution and thus an enemy action
Add in Zion Don and it’ll become federal bans. Cool. America’s dead
Trump lied to the Americans that voted him in and is now Israel first. What a shame. The synagogue of Satan continues to deceive people worldwide.
The minute I saw him go to the wailing wall I woke up. Can’t escape these fucking parasites
Exactly! It really does suck.
Dude is a boomer. The percentage of based boomers can be counted on one hand. Expecting any boomer leader to step up and criticize the Jews and not be Israel's bitch is foolish.
Jews: We don't control the government! That's just an antisemitic stereotype!
Also jews: Oy vey! The goyim know! Shut it down!
https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=64778
I'm going to violate the hell out of this.