But not a single person has tried to argue Dems are good at messaging to young men. In fact, lots of people have argued young men aren't even WORTH messaging to, which idk, seems like a bad way to win elections!
As retarded as this guy is, he does still have his eye on the prize and hasn't forgotten that you need fucking votes, period.
Also, while not used very nicely, "lizard brain" is a real term used and its something we all have. Its just another way to describe the Id, or really just the "pure instinct" side of our reasoning.
So the part where he says that is absolutely correct. Trump is appealing to the part of men that wants to be a fucking man and it resonates comfortably, while the Dems are appealing to some "ideal man" (aka a spineless beta bitch) idea that is offputting and nobody seems to want.
Dem's were the most successful when they appealed to our instinctual affinity for underdogs and the downtrodden. But if we look at something like Maslow's hierarchy, we can't manage to find contentment or worry about higher order thoughts when our basic needs aren't being met. As in, not being able to afford our food or shelter will always win over helping someone else, which is how they are losing whites, men, and a bunch of other formerly "guaranteed" voters.
Socialism, and all their versions of it, require the population to already be rich and prosperous to be able and willing to "share" with one another and not be envious and angry about it. Something that might have been true years ago, but really doesn't feel so right now.
Yeah, this is similar to Nietzsche's critique of Christianity that promotes a slave morality which invites the parasitism of Leftism to infest it.
You're fundamentally right, Socialism requires prosperity to start because it is, really, a bourgeois luxury belief system of the upper-class, striving to become the new elite.
However, Socialism doesn't die when the society becomes poorer, because it embeds itself with dependency and tribalism; so poverty no longer because a revolutionary force against a socialist state.
Wealthy societies become decadent, one symptom of decadence is rank stupidity. Look how thick the average person is today and the kind of slop the average person believes or falls for on the daily basis.
Also, while not used very nicely, "lizard brain" is a real term used and its something we all have. Its just another way to describe the Id, or really just the "pure instinct" side of our reasoning.
God forbid men actually use their instincts for something and not think thinks over 20 thousand times like some women do in their hivemind and then come to the conclusion that Chad might not be the correct partner and a partnership with 40 cats might be more to their liking.
The commenter was trying to reduce men to pure Id or lizard brain in this case, it’s clear it’s unfathomable as to how someone could disagree with his life view. If we were to talk about the portions of the population that do only seek indulgences well….
reduce men to pure Id or lizard brain in this case
If more people thought in these terms, society and all of their politics would be infinitely more successful. Our subconscious desires and instinctual drives are massively under valued in how much they effect behavior and thought.
Men should be reduced to that, everyone should, but its the most raw and honest reflection of what we want and desire without all the bullshit of us pretending to be something else.
Retarded Leftists fail to land because they believe in Tabula Rasa (most of the time, except when it isn't convenient) and thereby believe we don't have any deep seated instincts. Which is why they say things like "teach men to not rape" as if its learned behavior.
As retarded as this guy is, he does still have his eye on the prize and hasn't forgotten that you need fucking votes, period.
Also, while not used very nicely, "lizard brain" is a real term used and its something we all have. Its just another way to describe the Id, or really just the "pure instinct" side of our reasoning.
So the part where he says that is absolutely correct. Trump is appealing to the part of men that wants to be a fucking man and it resonates comfortably, while the Dems are appealing to some "ideal man" (aka a spineless beta bitch) idea that is offputting and nobody seems to want.
They are appealing to The New Socialist Man.
Dem's were the most successful when they appealed to our instinctual affinity for underdogs and the downtrodden. But if we look at something like Maslow's hierarchy, we can't manage to find contentment or worry about higher order thoughts when our basic needs aren't being met. As in, not being able to afford our food or shelter will always win over helping someone else, which is how they are losing whites, men, and a bunch of other formerly "guaranteed" voters.
Socialism, and all their versions of it, require the population to already be rich and prosperous to be able and willing to "share" with one another and not be envious and angry about it. Something that might have been true years ago, but really doesn't feel so right now.
Socialism always runs out of other people's money.
Yeah, this is similar to Nietzsche's critique of Christianity that promotes a slave morality which invites the parasitism of Leftism to infest it.
You're fundamentally right, Socialism requires prosperity to start because it is, really, a bourgeois luxury belief system of the upper-class, striving to become the new elite.
However, Socialism doesn't die when the society becomes poorer, because it embeds itself with dependency and tribalism; so poverty no longer because a revolutionary force against a socialist state.
That just means that Socialisms limps along until there is no longer enough food or money to pay the military and secret police.
Ronald Reagan was insightful enough to cause acceleration of military spending of the USSR, which hastened their inevitable economic collapse.
Socialism turns a successful country into a third world tin-pot dictatorship run by warlords. Some of these are very stable.
Wealthy societies become decadent, one symptom of decadence is rank stupidity. Look how thick the average person is today and the kind of slop the average person believes or falls for on the daily basis.
I haven't forgotten that a lot of them would rather that was optional and are willing to break the law to make it happen.
God forbid men actually use their instincts for something and not think thinks over 20 thousand times like some women do in their hivemind and then come to the conclusion that Chad might not be the correct partner and a partnership with 40 cats might be more to their liking.
The commenter was trying to reduce men to pure Id or lizard brain in this case, it’s clear it’s unfathomable as to how someone could disagree with his life view. If we were to talk about the portions of the population that do only seek indulgences well….
If more people thought in these terms, society and all of their politics would be infinitely more successful. Our subconscious desires and instinctual drives are massively under valued in how much they effect behavior and thought.
Men should be reduced to that, everyone should, but its the most raw and honest reflection of what we want and desire without all the bullshit of us pretending to be something else.
Retarded Leftists fail to land because they believe in Tabula Rasa (most of the time, except when it isn't convenient) and thereby believe we don't have any deep seated instincts. Which is why they say things like "teach men to not rape" as if its learned behavior.