Domestic enemies are always more dangerous than foreign enemies. You cannot destroy a nation from within just from the outside. And if you dig a bit deeper you'll find that the Chinese threat has a very familiar foundation.
He's downplaying because your retarded faggots that don't understand communism and you want to cry about jews.
He's literally calling you out for being to stupid to understand China's imperial efforts, and information warfare operations, because you want jews to control China to fulfill your narrative.
Great, now which one spends 4.5 Trillion dollars and actually runs multiple countries through a visible, working, ongoing, political system with clearly defined rules, people, logistics, financing, and clear lines of power and authority; and which one is the vast racial conspiracy that you assume is happening because you saw a jew in a picture?
We ain't gonna win a war when you're tilting at windmills.
You can lie to yourself about how often I've shoved the history of anti-white hatred into your own face as long as you want. Just because you want to cry about jews more than recognizing genuine geo-political strategic threats is not a good enough excuse.
It shows your historical illiteracy when you think the people who invented the jewish question were all dedicated hebrews, especially when all of them answered it with "no jew can exist within socialism".
Larry Fink has nothing on the CCP's involvement. But you're the kind of retard that's stupid enough to claim that China is a jewish state because Mao met one jew in 1951.
Again Raz0r is right about the fact that we are looking at a major Information Warfare operation waged against us by the CCP, which is effectively allied to the Deep State, using DIE and ESG investment racket in $4.5 trillion. They are doing similar things in Africa with their Belt & Road Initiative. In addition to making the governments literal debt slaves; they are also pushing Social Justice bullshit in Africa which enables the Chinese migrant colonies to have rights and protections that the domestic populations don't have, and using the same narrative: anti-chinese racism!
This is how they got entire industries to buy into revolutionary Leftism.
Although I don't think it was intentional, something similar happened to the housing market leading up to The Great Recession. Basically, one of the reasons that so many banks were making bad loans was because Chinese investors were buying any Mortgage Backed Security that could breathe. Part of that was because a lot of Chinese investors were trying to keep their investments out of China from having to constantly give up funds to the CCP. But in so doing, all that money flooded the housing market and promoted the mal-investment that lead to worse lending practices.
Eisenhower was right, Kissinger was wrong. Hell, LeMay might even have been right. Opening up to China didn't Liberalize China. It exposed us to Communism. Communism is a vampire economy. It can't survive without parasitizing our economy. Then they use the income we give them to ideologically capture our institutions. Even now, the IMF and World Bank think that they can use Monetary Warfare to control China. They can't. China needs to be blockaded. Taiwan needs nukes. Hong Kong needs to be liberated, and then also given nukes. No country on earth should trade with them.
I don't see how we ever break free of China without also reducing manufacturing regulations in the west. There's way too much red tape just to open a single factory here. Not to mention the minimum wage laws.
China rose to prominence making shitty consumer goods for pennies on the dollar. I don't see any reason that any number of third world shithole countries couldn't replace them by doing the same thing.
We could both reduce our dependence on China and strengthen our ties to their neighbors by encouraging/providing technical assistance/subsidizing the development of manufacturing industry in places like Thailand, Malaysia, the Philippines, etc.
Hell, it may be as simple as tariffing the shit out of goods from China and providing tax breaks for importing goods from those other countries. If you disincentivize companies from doing business with China and incentivize them to produce their goods elsewhere, they will do it.
The remaining shithole countries are still in China's sphere of influence. If the US ever goes full retard like it did with Russia, China will at minimum demand tribute for safe passage, or let totally-not-state-sanctioned pirates take from cargo ships headed for the West.
Thailand and the Philippines are historic US allies, and I read that even Vietnam is starting to get tired of China's shit. One of the surest ways to piss off your neighbors is to claim control over their territorial waters.
With economic ties come military alliances. One of China's boogeymen is being ringed with adversary countries allied with the US. Let's make that happen.
Right now they bully countries like the Philippines because they know they can get away with it. I think the closest analogy to 2024 China is 1930s Germany.
They're testing the waters to see what they can get away with and we need to smack that shit down hard. Yes they have a very large military, but it's completely untested. Their last real war was with Vietnam in 1979 and they didn't do so hot. After watching Russia fumble in Ukraine they're bound to be second-guessing their readiness to take on Western powers
Who said anything about the military? You're seriously going to send the full might of the US Navy just to stop some pirates stealing your Nikes and Funko Pops?
You did when you said that China would simply board other countries vessels or use fake pirates to steal from them if pivoted trade away from them.
Containing China requires exercising all the instruments of power. Western dependence on China for trade is our weakness, but it's also the only thing that prevents them from being treated like a pariah State like North Korea. Increased economic ties come with increased military cooperation and usually security guarantees.
Nikes and Funko Pops?
The South China Sea is one of the world's major fisheries and trade routes. I'm sure you understand that the struggle for dominance in the Pacific isn't about trash toys.
You did when you said that China would simply board other countries vessels or use fake pirates to steal from them if pivoted trade away from them.
Yeah, but it would be on the US to prove it was the People's Liberation Army Navy boarding ships, wouldn't it? Like the totally-not-NATO Ukrainians putting Putin on the back foot.
And again, you can avoid these "pirates" so long as you pay China an "escort fee". But the Big GAE's ego won't allow it.
I know the US has gotten used to being exempt from war crimes, but we're not the only ones who can play that game.
The South China Sea is one of the world's major fisheries and trade routes. I'm sure you understand that the struggle for dominance in the Pacific isn't about trash toys.
And China will keep it safe for itself and its allies. No America needed.
Sure, it'll wreak havoc on our consumption economy and trigger hyperinflation, but that's our problem, not theirs.
That's a good idea, as long as we are all on board with starting an explicit trade war against China. It's worth noting that lots of companies have moved plants to Mexico and South Africa, but found that the workers are often too lazy or dumb for even basic manufacturing tasks like assembling TVs. In one case most of the workers insisted on smoking weed on the clock.
I'd rather hire Americans but hopefully the brown Asians are manageable and still cheap.
You have several options. Tariffs for example. And requiring imports to adhere to the same standards as domestic products.
China is only so "powerful" because the collective West has put her into that position and is actively keeping her there. For example China can flood the world with her products because they basically pay nothing for shipping.
Jason born would wreck James Bond. There would be way too many quick cuts for Bond to handle. He wouldn’t even understand what’s happening and then BAM magazine down the throat.
He's downplaying (((their))) involvement.
Downplaying, but he deliberately used the phrase "fellow noticers".
Yes, it's because it's an insult.
Anyone fear mongering about China while AIPAC dominates our government is a traitor.
It must be nice to live in a world with only one enemy.
Domestic enemies are always more dangerous than foreign enemies. You cannot destroy a nation from within just from the outside. And if you dig a bit deeper you'll find that the Chinese threat has a very familiar foundation.
Enemies have to stab you from the front. Only a "friend" can stab you in the back.
Predictably.
He downplays (((their))) involvement all the time on twitter.
He's downplaying because your retarded faggots that don't understand communism and you want to cry about jews.
He's literally calling you out for being to stupid to understand China's imperial efforts, and information warfare operations, because you want jews to control China to fulfill your narrative.
There can be more than one malicious force in the world.
Great, now which one spends 4.5 Trillion dollars and actually runs multiple countries through a visible, working, ongoing, political system with clearly defined rules, people, logistics, financing, and clear lines of power and authority; and which one is the vast racial conspiracy that you assume is happening because you saw a jew in a picture?
We ain't gonna win a war when you're tilting at windmills.
This is rich coming from you. Mr. I'm Going To Deny There's Even An Issue To Be Addressed So Let Me Trot Out My Fabian Windmill.
I am perfectly capable of being hostile to both the Chinese and Jews who have ill intent for me.
You can lie to yourself about how often I've shoved the history of anti-white hatred into your own face as long as you want. Just because you want to cry about jews more than recognizing genuine geo-political strategic threats is not a good enough excuse.
Fuck off you apologist. I'm not in the mood for your sophistry tonight.
You are the one engaging in sophistry in the face of relentless evidence. If you weren't blinded by ideology, you'd see that.
We understand communism fully and the (((people))) who created it.
It shows your historical illiteracy when you think the people who invented the jewish question were all dedicated hebrews, especially when all of them answered it with "no jew can exist within socialism".
I wasn't aware that (((Larry Fink))) was Chinese
Larry Fink has nothing on the CCP's involvement. But you're the kind of retard that's stupid enough to claim that China is a jewish state because Mao met one jew in 1951.
China is not a jewish state, but Jews were definitely the ones who funded the Chinese communist revolution.
Definitely wasn't the US State Department or the explicit policy of the US government.
As long as you can blame one jew, you can support your fellow Socialists.
Again Raz0r is right about the fact that we are looking at a major Information Warfare operation waged against us by the CCP, which is effectively allied to the Deep State, using DIE and ESG investment racket in $4.5 trillion. They are doing similar things in Africa with their Belt & Road Initiative. In addition to making the governments literal debt slaves; they are also pushing Social Justice bullshit in Africa which enables the Chinese migrant colonies to have rights and protections that the domestic populations don't have, and using the same narrative: anti-chinese racism!
This is how they got entire industries to buy into revolutionary Leftism.
Although I don't think it was intentional, something similar happened to the housing market leading up to The Great Recession. Basically, one of the reasons that so many banks were making bad loans was because Chinese investors were buying any Mortgage Backed Security that could breathe. Part of that was because a lot of Chinese investors were trying to keep their investments out of China from having to constantly give up funds to the CCP. But in so doing, all that money flooded the housing market and promoted the mal-investment that lead to worse lending practices.
Eisenhower was right, Kissinger was wrong. Hell, LeMay might even have been right. Opening up to China didn't Liberalize China. It exposed us to Communism. Communism is a vampire economy. It can't survive without parasitizing our economy. Then they use the income we give them to ideologically capture our institutions. Even now, the IMF and World Bank think that they can use Monetary Warfare to control China. They can't. China needs to be blockaded. Taiwan needs nukes. Hong Kong needs to be liberated, and then also given nukes. No country on earth should trade with them.
I don't see how we ever break free of China without also reducing manufacturing regulations in the west. There's way too much red tape just to open a single factory here. Not to mention the minimum wage laws.
China rose to prominence making shitty consumer goods for pennies on the dollar. I don't see any reason that any number of third world shithole countries couldn't replace them by doing the same thing.
We could both reduce our dependence on China and strengthen our ties to their neighbors by encouraging/providing technical assistance/subsidizing the development of manufacturing industry in places like Thailand, Malaysia, the Philippines, etc.
Hell, it may be as simple as tariffing the shit out of goods from China and providing tax breaks for importing goods from those other countries. If you disincentivize companies from doing business with China and incentivize them to produce their goods elsewhere, they will do it.
The remaining shithole countries are still in China's sphere of influence. If the US ever goes full retard like it did with Russia, China will at minimum demand tribute for safe passage, or let totally-not-state-sanctioned pirates take from cargo ships headed for the West.
Thailand and the Philippines are historic US allies, and I read that even Vietnam is starting to get tired of China's shit. One of the surest ways to piss off your neighbors is to claim control over their territorial waters.
With economic ties come military alliances. One of China's boogeymen is being ringed with adversary countries allied with the US. Let's make that happen.
Right now they bully countries like the Philippines because they know they can get away with it. I think the closest analogy to 2024 China is 1930s Germany.
They're testing the waters to see what they can get away with and we need to smack that shit down hard. Yes they have a very large military, but it's completely untested. Their last real war was with Vietnam in 1979 and they didn't do so hot. After watching Russia fumble in Ukraine they're bound to be second-guessing their readiness to take on Western powers
Who said anything about the military? You're seriously going to send the full might of the US Navy just to stop some pirates stealing your Nikes and Funko Pops?
You did when you said that China would simply board other countries vessels or use fake pirates to steal from them if pivoted trade away from them.
Containing China requires exercising all the instruments of power. Western dependence on China for trade is our weakness, but it's also the only thing that prevents them from being treated like a pariah State like North Korea. Increased economic ties come with increased military cooperation and usually security guarantees.
The South China Sea is one of the world's major fisheries and trade routes. I'm sure you understand that the struggle for dominance in the Pacific isn't about trash toys.
Yeah, but it would be on the US to prove it was the People's Liberation Army Navy boarding ships, wouldn't it? Like the totally-not-NATO Ukrainians putting Putin on the back foot.
And again, you can avoid these "pirates" so long as you pay China an "escort fee". But the Big GAE's ego won't allow it.
I know the US has gotten used to being exempt from war crimes, but we're not the only ones who can play that game.
And China will keep it safe for itself and its allies. No America needed.
Sure, it'll wreak havoc on our consumption economy and trigger hyperinflation, but that's our problem, not theirs.
That's a good idea, as long as we are all on board with starting an explicit trade war against China. It's worth noting that lots of companies have moved plants to Mexico and South Africa, but found that the workers are often too lazy or dumb for even basic manufacturing tasks like assembling TVs. In one case most of the workers insisted on smoking weed on the clock.
I'd rather hire Americans but hopefully the brown Asians are manageable and still cheap.
You have several options. Tariffs for example. And requiring imports to adhere to the same standards as domestic products.
China is only so "powerful" because the collective West has put her into that position and is actively keeping her there. For example China can flood the world with her products because they basically pay nothing for shipping.
Well, good news, there's a guy running for president who explicitly takes issue with China and previously spent a large amount of time deregulating.
The Eternal Chicom lmao (They're the same scapegoat for the rael issue that most of these sorts use lol)
Rumble Alternative: https://rumble.com/v5gbg9p-china-exporter-of-esg-razr-rants.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
Jason born would wreck James Bond. There would be way too many quick cuts for Bond to handle. He wouldn’t even understand what’s happening and then BAM magazine down the throat.