The New York Times sets the table for The Steal 2.0
(archive.is)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
It's not faith in the system, it's just recognition about the capabilities of our enemies.
I don't have faith that the Maintenance Battalion can hold back the German offensive in the Ardennes. I just understand that Tiger Tanks can only operate with so much fuel.
So they were able to stuff ballots and manipulate the count for 4 days last time and normies didn't blink an eye, but 8 days would cause normies to revolt?
Maybe I'm misunderstanding you, but I'm trying to envision how the fraud can be stopped or exposed when the media is providing cover.
ETA: A key point imo is that it isn't Democrats cheating Republicans. It's Democrats and Republicans cheating Donald Trump.
You are misunderstanding me. There is a limitation to their capabilities, this doesn't have anything to do with "normies". They only have so much ammo to shoot.
They can't print 20 million ballots to swing Ohio blue. They can only print X number of ballots, and only in specific counties with corrupt officials.
Yes, you can get wider spread ballot fraud, but not enough to actually fully swing a state that Trump wins by 7 points in.
You're looking at a range of 3-5 point swings is what they can achieve. That means as bad as Arizona is, they might not even be able to pull off the cheating there. Wisconsin might actually be entirely lost to them.
I see what you mean now, thanks. I hope you're right.
But the fraud isn't just in one area.
Sure you've got your ballot printing in specific counties, you've also got google and facebook witholding and censoring information, that's a few more points overall. There's the army of "urban volunteers" who get paid per ballot they "source" that's a huge number in all inner city urban areas, there's all the "bugs and glitches" that will happen in red counties, that's a few more counties gone.
That's all part of the same industrial-fraud system. It has a limited capacity is my point, and it stops at about 5%.
You're wrong. There is no limit. When they print more ballots than voters exist, they just alter the records to add more fake people.
2020 told them they could get away with anything. Just stop the counting and add more votes until you win. The courts are no redress, so what is going to stop them?
No, the Law of Diminishing Returns always exists.
The courts did act in some cases of smaller scale. Adjustments were at state levels. Only so many people can be hired. Only so much paper exists.
That was the situation in 2016. It might be the optimist in me speaking, but I think Trump has locked in the establishment Right this time. They know he has this one in the bag and have largely bent the knee. Either they think they can use him as controlled opposition, or they plan to let the economy crash and put the blame on him. Can't speak to "Republican" state election officials though. They may act on their own.
He hasn't locked in the Establishment Right at all. There's a good chance they are going to throw the House and Senate to get him impeached and removed from office.
That being said, he's made more progress against the RINO Right than he has in previous years.
Unless they are more afraid of Vance than Trump; Trump is only half Scots.
Vance seems more ideological and religious and there's this streak of 'Braveheart' in the Scots-Irish (aka Border Scots) that is hard to characterize or understand by other peoples. Like we have the word "feud" because the Romans after conquering all these different places and tribes (and failing to hold Scotland) had no word of their own to describe what it is. They built Hadrian's Wall to keep them out because the Scots were too dangerous to the empire - not from their might but their wrath.
There's a good chance if Vance takes over for Trump and the deeps say he better go along "or else" that he yells "freedom!" before reading out the JFK secrets on livestream.