Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

74
The New York Times sets the table for The Steal 2.0 (archive.is)
posted 1 year ago by censorthisss 1 year ago by censorthisss +74 / -0
21 comments share
21 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
▲ 31 ▼
– censorthisss [S] 31 points 1 year ago +31 / -0

"If a winner is not declared on election night, it will not necessarily point to failures in the process. More likely, it will be a result of the intense security measures required for counting mail-in ballots."

"Intense security" such as sending everyone home and then pulling out suitcases of ballots to scan them after the counting was supposedly paused?

Or like some random Karen putting USB drives in her pocket and doing God knows what with it?

Or maybe they mean voting machines being reset the day before the election after the final software audit was allegedly completed?

I might just go camping for a week after I vote and completely disconnect because it's going to be brutal watching them steal the white house again....

permalink save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– Gizortnik 19 points 1 year ago +19 / -0

They may do the opposite. If Trump is winning the popular vote, they may start throwing thousands of votes away for failed signature matches and things like that. They would completely reverse themselves from 2020.

This is actually what they normally do with petitions. Petitions typically have a failure rate of 35% rejection of the signatures to keep ballot initiatives from going forward. But then they turn around and have an absentee ballot rejection rate of 1% or less because it's their votes.

They may, in fact, start throwing out republican votes en masse. Don't be surprised of absentee ballots get rejected up to 35% or more, depending on how the votes are looking.

That being said, it seems pretty clear we are on a "too-big-to-rig" path at the moment. Even with Covid, they were only moving the needle by 5%. With new laws in place, and with a popular vote win, we might be looking at them trying to figure out how to cheat by 7% in some states, with even less opportunity.

Unless it's a poll you like like Big Data Poll or Rasmussen, I would suggest explicitly lying to pollsters to throw off their campaigns strategy.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– censorthisss [S] 14 points 1 year ago +14 / -0

That being said, it seems pretty clear we are on a "too-big-to-rig" path at the moment. Even with Covid, they were only moving the needle by 5%. With new laws in place, and with a popular vote win, we might be looking at them trying to figure out how to cheat by 7% in some states, with even less opportunity.

I guess I've lost more faith in our systems than you have because I just view it as them needing to take 8 days to announce the "winner" compared to 4 days in 2020.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Gizortnik 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

It's not faith in the system, it's just recognition about the capabilities of our enemies.

I don't have faith that the Maintenance Battalion can hold back the German offensive in the Ardennes. I just understand that Tiger Tanks can only operate with so much fuel.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– censorthisss [S] 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

So they were able to stuff ballots and manipulate the count for 4 days last time and normies didn't blink an eye, but 8 days would cause normies to revolt?

Maybe I'm misunderstanding you, but I'm trying to envision how the fraud can be stopped or exposed when the media is providing cover.

ETA: A key point imo is that it isn't Democrats cheating Republicans. It's Democrats and Republicans cheating Donald Trump.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 3 ▼
– Guy_Incognito76 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

The normal rigging is about 5%. With covid they pushed it another 5%, and that still wasn't enough, so they had to do an emergency late night ballot dump for the final 1-2%.

I'd expect 20% this time. They're not going to let it get out of control.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– when_we_win_remember 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

In Georgia, ballot counters are hired by Stacey Abrams. Aside from the conflict of interest -- which is apparently A-OK with their governor, btw -- your intuition would indicate that these people aren't going to be capable of a job of this magnitude and importance. They don't pay a lot, especially after the middlemen get their cut. It's like a drug dealer hiring 7/11 employees to count his stash.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy