Shamelessness, thy name is 'The Atlantic'.
(i.imgur.com)
Comments (21)
sorted by:
For five years, they not only foisted a dementia patient on the American people, covered up his corruption with lies from the 'intelligence' community, but also insisted that he is 'sharp as a tack'.
Now, when their girls never had any cognitive abilities to lose, they're suddenly interested in cognitive decline to the point that they claim that being on message (a.k.a. repetitive speech) is a sign of it.
The best term for the US and its lackeys in Europe is indeed 'Empire of Lies'.
I honestly still don't understand the reaction of the Left after his debate performance. Yes it was bad, but it was only a little worse for a short time than what he's like every single fucking day.
Listening to Richard Barris's polling, it seems to actually be the case that most Americans, and damn near all Leftists, had no idea how bad Joe Biden was.
It's like they didn't even see him in 8 years.
I mean… they shamelessly hired a man who admitted to committing a racial hate crime in his own autobiography but said it was ok because he was black.
I’m convinced that there could be a black version of Charles Manson and there would be endless articles justifying his heinous acts. I know there were people who seemed to love Manson but I think it would be off the charts.
Wait, what? Who?
Even for a connoisseur of media malpractice, it's hard to keep track of all their depredations.
Coates, he wrote about participating in a racial hate crime and how it made him feel vindicated
He also committed a racial hate crime when he decided to racially prioritize blacks over whites for covid injections. According to the CDC, that would likely result in the unnecessary deaths of 3,000 whites. Last time I checked, that's an act of ethnic cleansing.
Nothing happened about it.
Don't forget that Andrew Cuomo is guilty of the deaths of about 45,000 people through negligent homicide.
How long is the Kamala "unburdened by what has been" compilation by now, 30 minutes? Repetitiveness has been the norm of the retard appeal that Americans political grandstand speeches have become for a long time now.
Even when the candidates aren't mentally impaired, the target audience still are.
The editor in chief of the atlantic is jeffrey goldberg.
Their biggest stakeholder is the Emerson Collective. The Emerson Collective is an organization focused on education, immigration reform, the environment, media and journalism, and health. Founded by billionaire philanthropist Laurene Powell Jobs, the collective, which operates under a limited liability company (LLC) model, uses philanthropy, impact investing, advocacy, and community engagement as tools to broadly spur change in the United States and abroad. The organization is considered to be one of the leading groups engaged in philanthrocapitalism.
So basically it's being used to spread everything the country should be against.
The guy who lied about Saddam having ties to Al Qaeda to lie the US into a war of aggression, and then 18 years later lied about Trump calling dead WW1 soldiers 'suckers'? That guy?
You can only fail upward if you lie for the regime.
Yep, that's the one.
The Atlantic is 100% jewish
Is what I was going to say.
That picture of Trump looks hilarious to me for some reason. They have to be so desperate and full of hate to come up with that whole story.
And I defy anyone in their newsroom to look nearly as good when they're in their 80's.
I can confidently say that ALL American mainstream outlets are compromised, most of the UK ones are along with Canada and language barrier stops me fully knowing the state of Europe, Asia and Middle Eastern media.
It was actually because they were foriegn that RT was useful for getting accurate information so long as it wasn't about Russia, them honestly reporting the events hurts America and Europe more than lies ever could.
Atlantic is also publishing paid for multi article discussions on AI. Everything agrees with Google who paid for it.
Trump's showing in that debate was a bad sign, he wasn't nearly as sharp as I'd expect from him and at his age its really expected.
But, I'd rather have a half functional Trump than anything the Left could throw up any and every day of the week. Double so because Vance is rather growing on me in a "the best we can get, not perfect" way and I'd wager those two would actually work together like a team should to overcome or resign if Trump started deteriorating.
He wasn't sharp, but it doesn't really seem any different from how he's been at the rallies. That's just kind of his persona at this point. To be honest, it almost comes across as if he wasn't well prepared, but that really shouldn't have been the case.
On the other hand, I've been saying for months that Vance is fucking excellent and is absolutely "our guy". He's less confrontational than Vivek, but where Vivek has some questionable background, Vance has been absolutely nailing everything so far.
Frankly, we need a VP debate. Vance will fucking destroy Waltz. I don't think anybody realizes just how good Vance is. Best of all, he's going on CNN and crushing them to their face.
Yeah, I think the VP debate is what will really make or break a lot of this election. Vance doesn't seem like the type to pull punches and he will make sure to drag Harris into every answer he has to shit all over her on top of Waltz.
He is why I don't really have a lot of concern over Trump's decline, or even being shot at again. Vance is everything people wanted from Trump and more, and isn't bogged down by age, a history, or a "stuck in his ways" old man mindset. And I think the Left knows that, so they'll try to keep Trump in the forefront to obscure Vance as much as possible.
Sorry, I think I may have thrown you off with what I meant by 'need'. Perhaps 'we need' is far to strong. I meant, I need. As in, "I'd love to see it*. I don't actually think the VP debate will do much beyond win a few undecided, demoralize the dems, and legitimize Vance among the dissident right.
I disagree. I think Vance is a strong enough voice right now that he can make the VP debate into something people watch. He is gaining popularity on the Right and getting a lot of "heel heat" with the Left, which Trump can't do anymore because TDS burn out has hit normies quite hard.
And if people are watching he has a strong chance to bring up a lot of the big issues right now, trannies, illegals, economy, and show that Waltz (and Harris) has contributed to that problem hard. Which I think will do more than nothing in terms of swaying the middle ground.
I agree that people will like watching Vance, I just think that the majority of "undecideds" at this point will probably not watch it anyway, and if they do most will watch their preferred meme reporters, and make a decision on that.
I think Vance might be our best shot to hit "disaffected current Left "liberals"" take a red pill and question what they've been told.
I've been very surprised in my very red area how many times I've seen rabid Harris supporters. Just today I saw a "I'm a veteran, not a sucker or loser" sign. That guy literally has no concept of anything outside the Leftist media ecosphere. I think that the propaganda has had a real effect on activating the Left, much more than Biden did. The group-think is real and effective. I think the best Vance can do is blunt that a bit.