The worst part of the past 4/6/8/10 years has been my blackpilling of the average attention span and awareness of normies. I knew there were retards out there who could be enticed with a jingling bell, but the sheer number of people who fall for "Here's propaganda of a brown kid looking sad, dissolve your country because he's so sad" is staggering. It reminds me of the feeling I had when I first saw gamergate, that feeling of obviously noticing that gay women and gay womenly men were using a trillion dollar industry as a personal piggy bank and wondering why people were so easily swayed by obvious lies.
well nowadays that usual gaslighting doesn't work. look at entertainment media in the west as a whole. There's a limit to how much nonsense the normie can take before they too crack, and were seeing the crack with dei slop flopping HARD
democracy is neither good nor bad. its a system for selecting figureheads. you could switch to hereditary monarchy tomorrow, and you'd have different figureheads. But thats no guarantee they won't do the exact same shit, because they would still be owned by the exact same people.
They say money is the root of all evil, and that is partially true. Money attracts evil people because it is a way to replace hard work with exploitation of goys and serfs. Rhodesians were defeated because dollar hoarders organized enough blockades and enough mercenaries and enough arms to prop up the opposing force. Likewise, an attempt to create a system free from global rootless tribal devil worshipers would be infiltrated subverted and perverted by uses of money (dollars, euros, gold, bullets).
Democracy, the way the intelligent Greeks originally devised it, was a brilliant idea. Allow the smart people of a close knit unified collective of one people to discuss and sway each other with reasonable discussion and have the best of a city-state establish rules and rulers through merit. American Democracy, however, is a system of bussing in as many rubes as possible, feeding them lies laced with gibs and appealing to womanly "My team over the good of people", and flood ballot boxes with no room for good and personal discussions of the direction of the way history will flow. And then once a certain team is elected, have the public face of a team pick and choose unelected paid off positions to establish rules that way to protect the interests of handlers.
They didn't used to vote. Now that the left used COVID to enable a whole lot of universal mail in voting, those disinterested masses don't have to do anything other than: check the mailbox one day; find a ballot in there; "think" to themselves, "Hmm. Which box should I check? Harris? What were her policies again? Was she even forced to have any? Even if she were, am I supposed to care what they are? Doesn't it really just matter that I vote on the righteous non-nazi, non-fascist side? Oh wait! I remember! Le Orange Man Bad! I've heard that non-stop for almost 10 years now!", then check the "not Trump" box, and stuff it back in the mail box.
Fuck. They can even skip the last step in a lot of places, because the left sends around people to harvest those ballots.
The left is evil. It isn't stupid. They have created a system that works.
my take is that it's a prediction on perception, not the quality of the candidate. a lot of trump supporters were banking on Harris's inability to do or say anything off script, but thanks to the moderation those opportunities were scarce. with the cheating that we all know is happening, Trump needs a significant margin over Harris in order to beat the margin of fraud. since Harris looks competent if you squinted, that margin was not delivered via the debate like many of us thought it would.
I could definitely see this. with the amount of laundered dark money the Democrats are operating on, it wouldn't be a stretch for them to buy out the betting markets.
Yeah the narrative was set in advance. The propaganda machine was always going to declare Harris the "clear winner" and follow up with more sham polls to "prove" their point.
that is so retarded. That was so biased as fuck even the normies tuned out
You're dramatically underestimating how effective propaganda is against the disinterested masses in the middle.
The worst part of the past 4/6/8/10 years has been my blackpilling of the average attention span and awareness of normies. I knew there were retards out there who could be enticed with a jingling bell, but the sheer number of people who fall for "Here's propaganda of a brown kid looking sad, dissolve your country because he's so sad" is staggering. It reminds me of the feeling I had when I first saw gamergate, that feeling of obviously noticing that gay women and gay womenly men were using a trillion dollar industry as a personal piggy bank and wondering why people were so easily swayed by obvious lies.
well nowadays that usual gaslighting doesn't work. look at entertainment media in the west as a whole. There's a limit to how much nonsense the normie can take before they too crack, and were seeing the crack with dei slop flopping HARD
And now you see why democracy was a mistake.
democracy is neither good nor bad. its a system for selecting figureheads. you could switch to hereditary monarchy tomorrow, and you'd have different figureheads. But thats no guarantee they won't do the exact same shit, because they would still be owned by the exact same people.
They say money is the root of all evil, and that is partially true. Money attracts evil people because it is a way to replace hard work with exploitation of goys and serfs. Rhodesians were defeated because dollar hoarders organized enough blockades and enough mercenaries and enough arms to prop up the opposing force. Likewise, an attempt to create a system free from global rootless tribal devil worshipers would be infiltrated subverted and perverted by uses of money (dollars, euros, gold, bullets).
Democracy, the way the intelligent Greeks originally devised it, was a brilliant idea. Allow the smart people of a close knit unified collective of one people to discuss and sway each other with reasonable discussion and have the best of a city-state establish rules and rulers through merit. American Democracy, however, is a system of bussing in as many rubes as possible, feeding them lies laced with gibs and appealing to womanly "My team over the good of people", and flood ballot boxes with no room for good and personal discussions of the direction of the way history will flow. And then once a certain team is elected, have the public face of a team pick and choose unelected paid off positions to establish rules that way to protect the interests of handlers.
I'll tell my mom something and she'll dismiss it.
A few months/years later the tv tells her the same thing and suddenly she believes in it.
I don't see why anyone disinterested would watch. You don't have to watch TV any more. You can stream something.
the disinterested masses in the middle are going hungry. Turns out propaganda can't feed you the FIRST TIME.
The disinterested masses in the middle don't vote..
They didn't used to vote. Now that the left used COVID to enable a whole lot of universal mail in voting, those disinterested masses don't have to do anything other than: check the mailbox one day; find a ballot in there; "think" to themselves, "Hmm. Which box should I check? Harris? What were her policies again? Was she even forced to have any? Even if she were, am I supposed to care what they are? Doesn't it really just matter that I vote on the righteous non-nazi, non-fascist side? Oh wait! I remember! Le Orange Man Bad! I've heard that non-stop for almost 10 years now!", then check the "not Trump" box, and stuff it back in the mail box.
Fuck. They can even skip the last step in a lot of places, because the left sends around people to harvest those ballots.
The left is evil. It isn't stupid. They have created a system that works.
How can we stop mail-in voting?
my take is that it's a prediction on perception, not the quality of the candidate. a lot of trump supporters were banking on Harris's inability to do or say anything off script, but thanks to the moderation those opportunities were scarce. with the cheating that we all know is happening, Trump needs a significant margin over Harris in order to beat the margin of fraud. since Harris looks competent if you squinted, that margin was not delivered via the debate like many of us thought it would.
Some dude on X said the odds changed minute one of the debate.
I could definitely see this. with the amount of laundered dark money the Democrats are operating on, it wouldn't be a stretch for them to buy out the betting markets.
Yeah the narrative was set in advance. The propaganda machine was always going to declare Harris the "clear winner" and follow up with more sham polls to "prove" their point.
The debate was just a clip farm.
The end result narrative was always going to be the same, they just went through the motions to farm for one liners and clips to help their machine.
I'd bet that once the discussion of the obvious bias of the moderators and the actual "fact checking" get more circulation, the odds will readjust.
Even if not, Trump is still the favorite to win the EC.
barely, and barely falls within the margin of fraud
Sure, she'll get a bump for about a week.
In 2 weeks' time she'll be back where she is now.
is that what they're calling those pizza and hotdog party's now? "Sorority partys"?