Beware the controlled opposition faggots
(www.youtube.com)
Comments (45)
sorted by:
JP is correct when he says that identifying yourself by your race is retarded. it might be different in Europe where race is more tied to geographical borders, but it certainly not the case in North America.
not remotely what I said.
>muh magic dirt
The US might have been founded on ideals, but when you have people coming in that can't even read, they will default to what they already know.
yet there are no hard lines to competence between races. there are tons of blacks who can read, and there are tons of whites who can't read. drawing the line at race is an incomplete solution.
the line should be drawn at competence, moral character, and willingness to adapt culturally. not race.
Sure there is a line of competence between races.
One invented the wheel of their own recognizance before the year 1100, and one did not.
resting on the laurels of your ancestors is lazy and entitled. I don't care what someone's great great great grandfather did, I care about what they can do and what they want today.
Now that's a hilarious attempt to point away from your own question.
my assertion
your rebuttal
my rebuttal to your rebuttal
I understand the confusion as we are both talking about different scopes of time. I should have been clearer in that I'm talking about today's world, not history.
A three thousand years difference in basic technological development, is exactly the difference that you described. But then you don't actually want the evidence you seemingly asked for. You're actually just desperate to ignore the facts it supports.
Intelligence has a major genetic component dude. That means it's heritable, which means it's racial too. Get over it.
not an argument.
my assertion is that intelligence and competence are not tied to race, and that filtering by race will not succeed in eliminating regressive people. I invite you to counter this assertion instead of just throwing insults.
Most people inherently identify by race you dumb retard, what's the first thing immigrants to in other countries? They connect with other immigrants of their ethnicity, you can see this with muzzies all the time. The same way you'd feel out of place if you were to walk down the street in Nigeria as a white person.
If intelligence and competence aren't tied to race, whites and eastern asians wouldn't be the only races capable of creating civilizations worth living in. The only African country that was ever worth living in as a non african was the South African republic, and that was thanks to white people, I know numerous people who went to work in SA and not as labourers, as engineers, and they were very prosperous whilst working there, and that was in the 80s, now I have not heard a single person willingly go to SA, hell even people who live in SA hate it, now I'll let you connect the dots and tell me what changed between current SA and the one from the 80s.
Same with the US, 50s were the era of glory and prosperity, and look at you now, again if you've solved the previous SA puzzle, I'll give you another one, what changed in the mighty US of A since the 50s? Hint: it began in the 60s.
You said North America, Canada is the same. So if there are no differences in intelligence and competence between races, why does a shift in __________ (you fill in the blanks if you've solved your puzzles) deteriorate a country?
This is not to say there aren't clever non whites/asians, but you'd have to be an absolute idiot to still ignore basic statistics and 1000s of years of tracked history, unlike a certain some who never tracked their own history due to being incompetent.
And people are retarded
Iran, Saudi Arabia, Dubai, Argentina. not saying these nations are perfect, but they are developed and largely civilized within their borders.
The US also saw massive glory and prosperity in the 70s, 90s, and even 00s. Much of the deterioration in the times between was caused by a financial and political bubbles popping.
because mass immigration does not encourage immigrants to adopt the new culture. couple this with most immigrants going on government welfare, and you end up getting the bottom of the barrel immigrating into your country.
statistics has bearing on population outcomes, but individual outcomes are quite removed. when viewing population statistics, a sample of even 1% encompasses hundreds of thousands of people.
You just listed a bunch of caucausoid nations lol.
pretty sure everyone here would call them Middle Eastern and Hispanic in any other context
Because lines on a map mean more than the blood you share with your kin.
the founding fathers wanted to accept all Europeans. english, french, irish, scottish, italian, spanish, whatever. many different races.
the world has expanded, communication has grown, and travel has become easier. people of given races have both advanced and regressed, including whites.
it is best to be intelligent and competent yourself, to surround yourself with intelligent and competent people, and distance yourself from regressive people. these traits are not bound to race.
no individuals are equal, everyone has their strengths and weaknesses. those strengths and weaknesses vary so much that race does not accurately subdivide the population.
we are not dogs