I'm going to state the obvious, and it ought to be pretty obvious at this point even without an explicit admission; these companies are getting government money. In fact I'd say that's their 'seed' capital.
Government especially, but private too. It's free money in a ponzi scheme since every single pension fund is operating under the "growth based economy" expectation of more money coming in than going out.
So they invest in a few things that can show some return on a report here and there, and the rest into these kind of asset management companies or buying land to sell at a loss to Bill Gates.
In crypto part of what an investor looks at is how its minted. This is why mining was popular. Anyone who could mine got in on a share of the new mint entering the economy. I bring it up because with US dollars, we pay jews to print the dollars, then we borrow and reborrow the same money with interest twice over if we want that money to make a pit stop before it circles back to jews. This creates a net negative economy of debt (read: goyim slavery) as the interest is not minted: more debt exists than currency and there is zero chance for everyone to be out of debt ever.
Having dug into the finances of the AAA companies these days as part of my own personal research there are other copy-cat financial management firms as well like Vanguard and a bunch of other firms you've never heard of. These firms are pissing away billions on completely unproductive companies and woke employees getting wine on tap and eating buffet food every day at the office all for the sake of pushing 'the message'.
Some of the biggest shareholders in EA for example have dumped over 40+ billion into their shares to prop them up which when you think about it for a games company is insane. No wonder none of the business owners give two shits about what gamers think of their products, because they're not making money off gamers anymore.
In slight defense of Vanguard, they actually backed off on that shit.
“We cannot state that ESG investing is better performance-wise than broad index-based investing,” Buckley said. “Our research indicates that ESG investing does not have any advantage over broad-based investing.”
Buckley’s statements followed Vanguard’s withdrawal from the Net Zero Asset Managers (NZAM) initiative—a group of 301 asset managers that says it is “committed to supporting the goal of net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 or sooner, focused on lowering carbon emissions in their portfolios.”
From another article:
Daniel Wiener, chairman of Adviser Investments in Newton, Massachusetts and a longtime Vanguard observer, said the firm's withdrawal showed it lacked a strong leader on ESG issues that BlackRock has in its CEO Laurence Fink.
"Backing out of this thing is simply Vanguard blowing with the winds of constant change. They don’t have a strong personality like Fink to champion a cause," Wiener said
Vanguard is actually owned by it's member's funds, which makes it somewhat more answerable to normal people as opposed to using your retirement funds to lose money on Fink's pet projects.
Thanks a lot for that detail, i need to poke around at that stuff when I have the time and inclination. Granted, I just shrugged at the numbers but even then I don't think that's actually a good thing for a company because it means they don't have to worry about turning a profit, so why make any video games at all?
I'm convinced one of the reasons production times are so long for games now is because they want to fake their hours and pretend they need that long to milk investor money through salaries and fake employee growth.
A conspiracy nut might say this validates claims that there's been a semitic agenda to destroy homogeneous cultures for decades. Not only are they blatantly doing it but they've amassed an bottomless war chest in anticipation preparation for it.
BlackRock started as part of Blackstone
Stephen A. Schwarzman and Larry Fink (the CEO and founders of both BlackRock and Blackstone) are both jewish bankers.
To be fair to them and Bebe Sucre they aren't exactly using camouflage to hide.
They've got chutzpah.
Darkmineral next or will it be just Blackrock but in Spanish?
That would be no bueno because black in Spanish is... El NeGrO. Though, El Roca Negro would be a hilarious name for a Spanish restaurant in Mecca.
I'm going to state the obvious, and it ought to be pretty obvious at this point even without an explicit admission; these companies are getting government money. In fact I'd say that's their 'seed' capital.
You are correct, but probably not the way you think. These companies own the US debt, and the interest payments are going to them.
Pension funds.
Government especially, but private too. It's free money in a ponzi scheme since every single pension fund is operating under the "growth based economy" expectation of more money coming in than going out.
So they invest in a few things that can show some return on a report here and there, and the rest into these kind of asset management companies or buying land to sell at a loss to Bill Gates.
https://www.dtnpf.com/agriculture/web/ag/news/business-inputs/article/2024/01/30/tech-billionaire-bill-gates-spent
In crypto part of what an investor looks at is how its minted. This is why mining was popular. Anyone who could mine got in on a share of the new mint entering the economy. I bring it up because with US dollars, we pay jews to print the dollars, then we borrow and reborrow the same money with interest twice over if we want that money to make a pit stop before it circles back to jews. This creates a net negative economy of debt (read: goyim slavery) as the interest is not minted: more debt exists than currency and there is zero chance for everyone to be out of debt ever.
Having dug into the finances of the AAA companies these days as part of my own personal research there are other copy-cat financial management firms as well like Vanguard and a bunch of other firms you've never heard of. These firms are pissing away billions on completely unproductive companies and woke employees getting wine on tap and eating buffet food every day at the office all for the sake of pushing 'the message'.
Some of the biggest shareholders in EA for example have dumped over 40+ billion into their shares to prop them up which when you think about it for a games company is insane. No wonder none of the business owners give two shits about what gamers think of their products, because they're not making money off gamers anymore.
In slight defense of Vanguard, they actually backed off on that shit.
From another article:
Vanguard is actually owned by it's member's funds, which makes it somewhat more answerable to normal people as opposed to using your retirement funds to lose money on Fink's pet projects.
Thanks a lot for that detail, i need to poke around at that stuff when I have the time and inclination. Granted, I just shrugged at the numbers but even then I don't think that's actually a good thing for a company because it means they don't have to worry about turning a profit, so why make any video games at all?
I'm convinced one of the reasons production times are so long for games now is because they want to fake their hours and pretend they need that long to milk investor money through salaries and fake employee growth.
A conspiracy nut might say this validates claims that there's been a semitic agenda to destroy homogeneous cultures for decades. Not only are they blatantly doing it but they've amassed an bottomless war chest in
anticipationpreparation for it.Idk I like their grills.
Blackrock(bergsteinowitz)