Look at these subhuman faggots
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (55)
sorted by:
communists are worse than nazis in every. possible. way.
Ask any remaining polish fossil and they will tell you they preferred the nazi occupation.
Ukrainians literally welcomed the Nazis when they invaded the USSR because they hated life under Stalin run communism so much.
Well, those types would still welcome the Nazis, and not because Putin is such a villain...
And most fought for the USSR, despite Stalin's depredations, many fewer for the Nazis - though this is mostly because the Nazis acted even worse than the Bolshies had.
Well sure, when the commissar points his Tokarev at you and tell you that you will fight for the motherland, you choose the probability of dying in the red army over the certainty of dying at the regime's hands. Mind you these people remembered the Holodomor that was subjected to them just 10 years earlier. The Ukrainians didn't fight for their love of Stalin or communism despite the bullshit revisionist history from Russophiles.
The Nazis did mistreat the Ukrainians because they wanted the Ukrainian land as part of their lebensraum policy. But if you think the commies were in any way good, then you're fucking insane. Between the soviet genocide against the Ukrainians, Stalin's Reign of Terror, and the general shittiness of living in the communist USSR, Ukrainians fucking hated Moscow and thought that Germany would be better. Which is saying a lot and is my point.
They must have forgotten about how the Nazi occupation eliminated millions of the Polish population...
Nazis were literally just recolor variant commies. They all belong in the same woodchipper with the rest of the grubbling faggots who would be dictators. Sociopathy drives leftism, which is the great disease of the human mind.
Nac Soc had a cult mentality where everything was devoted to the Fuhrer and the state. (Fascism obviously.) You see this in how Hannah Reitsch spoke about Hitler, for instance. This totalizes everything, including religious belief, which I couldn't accept.
It might be better and have a lower kill count, but you're wrong on many points.
It is still fundamentally a form of socialism and it comes right up the the line on private ownership. It's still your factory, in theory, but here's a party member to dictate how 90% of it gets run, and who you can employ. It's partially yours, on paper. Better? Sure, but not by that much.
No, it sought to eliminate class hierarchies (it is, after all, a socialism) and it wasn't exactly trad in regards to sex and the workplace (sex is more complex, because they also highly promoted and paid for motherhood due to their other concerns). It's not all hierarchies, sure, but it is not as free of proto DEI stuff as you might think.
A significant part of the nazi belief was a socialist and sort of Malthusian understanding of the world's economics. They needed lebensraum. Not for any particular resource, or just space for hypothetical larger future generations, but because their economic theories said the world and economy was doomed and they needed more if the German people were to not starve.
It was all for the benefit of one nation yes, but it needed the space of all others.
They were both command economies though. Just because one believed that the upper class was to be dismantled, and the other believed that the state should be unified with its people was different, both governments exercised complete control over their economy in the same way.
Communism is about power, and manipulating masses to gain that power with oppressor / oppressed dogmatic propaganda. DEI is a modern contrivance that communism predates. Your understanding of the trappings of a modern form of the ideology misses the forest for the trees.
Relative cultural trappings do not define an ideology. Structures and effects do.
You should be able to distinguish between slogans and reality.
That's why they invited Albert Einstein to come back to Germany?
And then invade very other country...
If that is the case, why did it take 251,933 years of human history before the first national socialist showed up? No doubt you might make analogies between national socialism and things that came before. But I bet there will be pretty major differences between the NSs of the 1930s and those your retrospectively baptize as such.
Don't some conservatives say that they are communists within their own family, but that this is exactly why it does not work on a larger scale?
You can think that but tactically you need to stop countersignaling "nazis". Because commies are the ones who are currently winning and in power. By attacking the enemies of commies you are de-facto supporting the commies, even when you say "both are bad".
This is the guy that argues that True Anarchism has never been tried, don't bother. He is just another shill.
No, faggot. I will not start simping for authoritarian ideologies that only superficially oppose the current regime. Both belong in the fire.
Your goblinoid faction works at the behest of the globalists. Pushing leftist faggotry as "alt" right" is a fed psyop. Globalists do not care which of your retarded dogmas they have to pretend to care about to seize power. The concentration of power is the goal, because subverting power structures is what they do best.
You illiterate maggots infesting and destroying actual right wing organization attempts are the ones who must stop. You are no different. Your solution to government crimes is more government. That is THEIR GOAL. You are NO DIFFERENT. You have fallen for the trap and you serve the same masters as the commie useful idiots. You serve "them". No matter what label you want to use, the idiotic ((())) da joos or the correct label of globalists, the enemy you CLAIM to oppose is the one you are actually SERVING when you simp for leftist bullshit and try to derail or subvert actual right wing efforts.
What is "actual right wing" to you? Is the civil rights act a part of it? Do women still get to vote? Do women get the final say in when and whom they will marry? Is "domestic violence" and "marital rape" a category of crime? Are neighborhoods allowed to keep blacks from moving in? Are stores and restaurants allowed to keep blacks out? Is miscegenation legal? Does the US still maintain a massive standing army? Are faggots allowed to buy babies?
Explain it to me, I'm listening and willing to be convinced.
Post Reported for:
Nothing is sufficiently insulting to be considered a slur.
National Socialists are not an identity group.